Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

DAY 50 DUmmies held hostage
chumpchimp | June 16, 2005 | various

Posted on 06/16/2005 12:40:35 PM PDT by franksolich

DUMMIE ALERT!


DUMMIE ALERT!


INTIMIDATION TACTICS OF ANDYITES BETRAYED!


QUESTIONING "ANDROID" SUDDENLY CONVERTED INTO HARD-CORE "ANDYNOID"!


BULLYING TACTICS USED BY ANDYITES TO SUPPRESS TRUTH!


Image hosted by Photobucket.com


http://smirkingchimp.com/viewtopic.php?topic=56940&forum=3


TOPICS: Conspiracy; Humor
KEYWORDS: bison; du; dummies
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-94 next last
To: JLO

Lock Ban Delete.

Free Speech the Progressive way!

lol


41 posted on 06/16/2005 8:38:22 PM PDT by commonguymd (My impatience is far more advanced than any known technology.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: commonguymd; franksolich; PJ-Comix; All
No kidding! Image hosted by Photobucket.com
42 posted on 06/16/2005 8:43:13 PM PDT by JLO
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: JLO

I didn't even make the cut. goodboy didn't even mention me.
I guess I'm a nobody freeper. :(
I'm just going to go to my corner and pout.




Ü




43 posted on 06/16/2005 9:33:56 PM PDT by imskylark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: imskylark; JLO; CaliGirl-R; jennyjenny; franksolich
goodlittleboy doesn't know what he's talking about. He's got me listed as being a member of Scamdy.com when I'm not. I have trouble just keeping up with FR.

But I think goodlittleboy has it in for me because I called him a whiney foul-mouthed little brat, or something like that. And of course, I did post his picture:


44 posted on 06/16/2005 10:34:04 PM PDT by Charles Henrickson (goodlittleboy, you've been a BAAAD boy!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Charles Henrickson

Did you ever get him to autograph it for you?



Still the funniest post ever Mr. Henrickson. There has been lots of terrific freeper humor in these threads, but that one post took me over the edge.


45 posted on 06/16/2005 10:44:50 PM PDT by CaliGirl-R
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: CaliGirl-R
So, Goodboy thinks everyone must have a receipt for their donation? What if you mailed a check? Oh yes, it would surely be canceled by now!

Love how there can be receipts for all donations but no accounting of donations.

46 posted on 06/17/2005 6:33:15 AM PDT by Amityschild (I may be gullible BUT I'm not a DUmmie!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Amityschild; All

Don't you love how they have made this about donors having to prove they donated, having to offer up their names and phone numbers, etc? They even asked one guy on the Malloy board to post his grandfather's PC diagnosis sheet, which the guy did, then they dogpiled on him even more and disregarded it.

Asking strangers for that stuff does absolutely nothing to clear up the questions with the fundraiser. It just makes the Goonie Brigade look worse, as if that's possible, lol!


47 posted on 06/17/2005 7:34:22 AM PDT by KJC1 (Somebody shook up the Ants!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: KJC1
>>>Asking strangers for that stuff does absolutely nothing to clear up the questions with the fundraiser. It just makes the Goonie Brigade look worse, as if that's possible, lol! <<<

That, and the fact that this poster could provide documentation in a nano second that the grandfather had PC, did not help their side much either. They were shocked that someone might make a claim and actually have documentation to back it up.
48 posted on 06/17/2005 8:24:47 AM PDT by jennyjenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: jennyjenny
Don't you love how they have made this about donors having to prove they donated, having to offer up their names and phone numbers, etc?

The goodboy/benburch tag team claim that no one is entitled to ask any questions, though they will deign to offer information privately to people who identify themselves completely and prove they donated.

One of them made an analogy to giving a quarter to a bum on the street and how doing that does not give one the right to inquire what the bum intends to do with the money.

A very apt analogy, and more revealing than they intended.

They also claimed that this was not an "organized charity" so they did not need to follow any of the laws of Washington. Which is clearly not the case, as anonymousarmy has posted the law that any endeavour to raise funds, especially over $25k, must register with the state. Even those exempt from the law are encouraged to file a formal exemption.

SD

49 posted on 06/17/2005 8:38:17 AM PDT by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: franksolich
Frank,

A suggestion, if you don't mind. A link to each new update from the previous one would help direct traffic to the new thread.

SD

50 posted on 06/17/2005 8:39:30 AM PDT by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
I like how they build an imaginary straw man when posting a pathology report is suggested, they say no one will believe it anyway. If I were Andy I would have never posted the documants he did. You don't need too many brain cells firing to know a pre op CancerCare Financial Application isn't the best documant to post as proof of a cancer diagnosis, especially after the surgery, when a pathology report is most surely available. By posting the lame "proof" he has Andy has conditioned the skeptical to question anything he posts as proof, the skepticism is his own fault, if he had posted logical, solid documentation from the beginning he would seem far more credible now.

Now they are saying it's a right wing hit job to keep Andy out of politics!! Their dishonesty and stupidity is amazing. I wouldn't believe it if I didn't see it with my own eyes.

51 posted on 06/17/2005 8:58:41 AM PDT by dynoman (Objectivity is the essence of intelligence. - Marylin vos Savant)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: SoothingDave

The funny thing is they don't get to decide what they call themselves. The law does that for them.

Legal definition of a "charitable organization" for Washington State:

RCW 19.09.020
Definitions.

(2) "Charitable organization" means any entity that solicits or collects contributions from the general public where the contribution is or is purported to be used to support a charitable activity, but does not include any commercial fund raiser or commercial fund-raising entity as defined in this section. "Charitable" (a) is not limited to its common law meaning unless the context clearly requires a narrower meaning; (b) does not include religious or political activities; and (c) includes, but is not limited to, educational, recreational, social, patriotic, legal defense, benevolent, and health causes.

http://www.secstate.wa.gov/charities/laws.aspx


52 posted on 06/17/2005 9:04:47 AM PDT by KJC1 (Somebody shook up the Ants!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: SoothingDave

Thanks for the ping Dave!

Now, my best friend worked for a non-profit. She says that all financial endeavors--meaning ALL--should have been reported to the IRS, as federal law stands on charitable entities. I'm assuming that this has in fact happened. Has it, does anyone know?


53 posted on 06/17/2005 9:51:22 AM PDT by SoVaDPJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: SoVaDPJ
She says that all financial endeavors--meaning ALL--should have been reported to the IRS, as federal law stands on charitable entities. I'm assuming that this has in fact happened. Has it, does anyone know?

I'll fill you in on all the details as soon as you tell me your complete name, address, social security number, mother's maiden name, Visa card number and expiration date. ;-)

SD

54 posted on 06/17/2005 9:54:21 AM PDT by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: franksolich; All
Interesting;

"Shortly after the election, Stephenson got word that his sister had died. He headed back to Texas for her wake and burial. Meanwhile, Harris was engaged in a battle for prime time news coverage. To many participants in the election investigations, it seemed that the fraud involved in the Presidential election should be loudly trumpeted by the media. However, this was not the case. Rumor was wild on the Internet that the press had been "locked-down" on this issue. Since less than fifty days earlier, the White House had helped to exile veteran reporter Mary Mapes and her boss, Dan Rather, from CBS news, the mainstream media was only too eager to fall in line with whatever the President wanted and the truth be damned.

The only small glimmer of hope was Keith Olbermann of MSNBC News, who had a news program on Cable TV. He alluded to voter fraud on more than one show. He put out feelers that he would be open to hearing from Harris. Olbermann's people called Stephenson about the need to reach Harris. There was a mix-up in Stephenson contacting Harris. And somehow or another, Harris and Olbermann came to blows. The incredible fallout for all of this was the following posting, on the extremely popular Black Box Voting website:"

"December 14th, 2004-- The six-member Board of Directors of Black Box Voting has unanimously voted to terminate the employment of Associate Director Andy Stephenson, for:

- Repeatedly lying to various members of the board of directors
- Misrepresenting results of investigations
- Mishandling telephone communications and withholding information
- Temper tantrums and hanging up on members of the organization
- Outburst at the Florida Supervisor of Elections meeting, offending public officials
- Failing to assist, show up, or even call while Kathleen Wynne and Bev Harris repeatedly reached him to request assistance when they were accosted by Volusia County police. Black Box Voting apologizes for these problems."

Last paragraph;

"Again, rumors and gossip raged across the Internet. Not knowing what to make of the scenario, Democratic Underground finally shut off all discussion relating to it. However, this reporter decided that the one lead that could establish StephensonÕs innocence was the owner of the Baltimore Orioles, Peter Angelos. Angelos is the attorney famous for the legal showdown over asbestos. Among the facts that Stephenson claimed about his illness was this interesting tidbit: Angelos had helped contact the heads of Johns Hopkins and convinced them to make the operation possible for Stephenson.

On Tuesday, May 19th, I called Mr. Angelos. His secretary said that if the call was related to Stephenson, then Angelos had asked that I be put right through. After a short introduction, I explained my predicament. I needed to ask: "Was it true that Angelos had offered help in the matter of the Johns Hopkins operation?"

There is no answer, I wonder why.

Source; The Life and Tragic Times of An American Activist
By Carol Sterritt

55 posted on 06/17/2005 10:05:05 AM PDT by dynoman (Objectivity is the essence of intelligence. - Marylin vos Savant)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: SoothingDave

LMAO

Mr. Dave--are you trying to seduce me?


56 posted on 06/17/2005 10:39:34 AM PDT by SoVaDPJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: SoVaDPJ
I'm just ten dollars away from seducing you...

SD

57 posted on 06/17/2005 10:52:53 AM PDT by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: dynoman

That is so weird. It's like the story just stops. Like watching the last five minutes of a TV show and then they break in with news that Castro died.

You're happy to hear it, of course, but couldn't they have waited five minutes?

Maybe someone should alert Pitt and he can get Conyers to hold a march where he can nail something to the door of the Coastal Post Online.

It can't reflect well on "journalists" to end the story before the punchline.

Maybe it's a cliff hanger in on July 1, she'll post the rest of the story.


58 posted on 06/17/2005 11:28:14 AM PDT by Duke Nukum (Fiery the Angels rose & as they rose deep thunder roll'd around their shores)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Duke Nukum; franksolich; All
Hmmm. A new poster called "earthsalt" on the Mike Malloy Forum just dropped a bomb in that AndyScam thread. He lists his web site as http://www.dailykos.com. He refers to a thread at "Problem Adults" about the A.S.S.

It will be interesting to see how Ben Burch and Goodboy respond.

59 posted on 06/17/2005 12:03:50 PM PDT by dynoman (Objectivity is the essence of intelligence. - Marylin vos Savant)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Duke Nukum

I read the Coastal Post article awhile back and wondered why it ended there. Maybe she got Angelos on the phone and he said "Damn that Andy! I'm gonna kick his @ss after I kick flyarm's @ss, those @#$%^^& idiots!!!!! AHHHHHHH!

So Carol the reported decided to leave THAT part out! LOL


60 posted on 06/17/2005 12:08:00 PM PDT by CaliGirl-R
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-94 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson