Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 06/02/2005 7:09:53 PM PDT by Panerai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Panerai
I usually stick up for Microsoft, but if this is true ... it sucks.  The new editions of IE need to be backwards-compatible.
2 posted on 06/02/2005 7:36:25 PM PDT by softwarecreator (Facts are to liberals as holy water is to vampires)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Panerai
Not surprising. I still pick Win2K over XP.


3 posted on 06/02/2005 7:55:28 PM PDT by rdb3 (Yeah, but what's it spelled backwards?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Panerai
I am a win2k user (an excellent system), and now that I know I will never taste the sweet, forbidden fruit that is IE7, I say...

BFD!

4 posted on 06/02/2005 7:58:32 PM PDT by Petronski (A champion of dance, my moves will put you in a trance, and I never leave the disco alone.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Panerai

I could care less; my Win2K box at work has Mozilla installed.


5 posted on 06/02/2005 8:03:21 PM PDT by Born Conservative ("If not us, who? And if not now, when? - Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ShadowAce

ping!


7 posted on 06/02/2005 10:57:26 PM PDT by JoJo Gunn (Help control the Leftist population. Have them spayed or neutered. ©)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Panerai

What is this IE you speak of?


8 posted on 06/02/2005 11:07:21 PM PDT by neb52
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Panerai
Who cares.

I have Firefox 1.0.4 and Maxthon 1.3.1 installed on my Windows 2000 Pro (SP4) system, so the new features of Internet Explorer 7.0 are not needed for me.

9 posted on 06/03/2005 12:45:56 AM PDT by RayChuang88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Panerai

I have a Win2k box at work. I use Firefox on it too, so I could care less about whether it will run IE7.


10 posted on 06/03/2005 1:10:31 AM PDT by Redcloak (We'll raise up our glasses against evil forces singin' "whiskey for my men and beer for my horses!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Panerai; softwarecreator
Although Windows 2000 will be supported until 2010, at the end of June of this year Microsoft will no longer accept requests for design changes or new features for the operating system.


I usually stick up for Microsoft, but if this is true ... it sucks. The new editions of IE need to be backwards-compatible.

( Sigh! )

Just another reason to learn Linux. And I hate trying to have to teach myself another OS, but between this, and MS's new licensing schemes, I guess I'll have to.

They really are shooting themselves in the foot with this stuff.

11 posted on 06/03/2005 1:13:36 AM PDT by backhoe (-30-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Panerai
They have an alternative in Firefox or Netscape. And by then Longhorn will be available. How many still use Windows 95? That was like ages ago!

(Denny Crane: "Sometimes you can only look for answers from God and failing that... and Fox News".)
12 posted on 06/03/2005 1:27:26 AM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Panerai
Oh, no. We better upgrade to WinXP, now!

Honestly... why does MS think we stuck with Win2K all this time???
14 posted on 06/03/2005 3:43:14 AM PDT by Nataku X
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rdb3; chance33_98; Calvinist_Dark_Lord; Bush2000; PenguinWry; GodGunsandGuts; CyberCowboy777; ...

20 posted on 06/03/2005 5:22:15 AM PDT by ShadowAce (Linux -- The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Panerai

Another uptick in the use of Firefox.


23 posted on 06/03/2005 5:25:42 AM PDT by Tribune7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Panerai
IE 7, which will be available in beta this summer, will offer improved security features and basic tabbed browsing. It is also expected to offer improved standards support, including enhanced support for CSS 2 and PNG transparencies.

Its about damn time!

26 posted on 06/03/2005 5:32:27 AM PDT by N3WBI3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Panerai
Can you say "Firefox", little boys and girls?



30 posted on 06/03/2005 5:52:13 AM PDT by StoneGiant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Panerai

I'd like to see Microsoft get away from integrating the browswer into the O/S, which is directly causing this problem. On the other hand, Win2K is over 5 years old, and basically no vendor provides free support for operating systems that long in the tooth. The fact that it is that old yet still a reliable O/S for many is more of a plus than a minus.


31 posted on 06/03/2005 5:56:17 AM PDT by Golden Eagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Panerai
Microsoft has drawn some criticism after confirming that it will not make the next version of Internet Explorer available to users of its Windows 2000 operating system.

I guess I will move to Foxfire then.

51 posted on 06/03/2005 7:04:34 AM PDT by Paul C. Jesup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Panerai

When IE 6 no longer gets the job done, remove it and go to a different browser.

This is great news for browsers like Firefox.


77 posted on 06/03/2005 2:16:31 PM PDT by A CA Guy (God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson