Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

President's FY06 Budget Shortchanging Veterans??
Email ^

Posted on 02/18/2005 9:41:44 PM PST by Fatigued Mother

VETERANS OF FOREIGN WARS E-NEWSLETTER & UPDATE February 2005

Welcome to the February edition of the VFW email Newsletter.

VFW NATIONAL NEWS: President's FY06 Budget Shortchanging Veterans

Budget cuts for veterans' programs in the Bush administration's FY06 budget will drastically curtail access to VA care say VFW officials. The budget proposal calls for doubling the co-pay for prescription drugs and requiring an enrollment fee for veterans desiring to use VA health-care facilities. VFW Commander John Furgess says it's pretty clear that the funding of veterans' health care and other programs is not an administration priority and is accusing the Bush administration of trying to balance the federal deficit "... on the backs of military veterans."

Read more: www.vfw.org/index.cfm?fa=news.newsDtl&did=2362


TOPICS: Military/Veterans
KEYWORDS: foreignwars; fy06; healthcare; newbie; shortchanging; veterans
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-38 last
To: Smartaleck; TwilightDog; USNBandit
MJY1288 humbly asks you to read post #14 :-(
21 posted on 02/18/2005 10:38:45 PM PST by MJY1288
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: MJY1288

(patting MJY1288 on the head)


22 posted on 02/18/2005 10:44:04 PM PST by Fatigued Mother
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Fatigued Mother
Check out post 15 above. From that site:

The Veterans Health Administration has received record budget increases over the last four years. With this budget proposal, the President, working in partnership with Congress, will have increased health care funding for veterans by more than 47 percent since FY ’01. The President’s FY ’06 budget proposal requests $30.7 billion for VA’s health care program.

As has been said, this is just a budget proposal. I suspect that there may be some unintended consequences of proposals and restructuring that will get hammered out in Congress. But in no way can they characterize Bush as turning his back on veterans. Kerry tried the same thing in his campaign...I don't think he got much traction there either.

23 posted on 02/18/2005 10:51:06 PM PST by Dolphy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MJY1288

Someone put "nubie" in my key words! = 0 Who's playin? = )


24 posted on 02/18/2005 10:51:30 PM PST by Fatigued Mother
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Fatigued Mother

The Keywords can be added by anybody, some people use it as a way to trash the thread without actually posting to it. The Moderators don't appreciate it much, and have warned people not to do it.


25 posted on 02/18/2005 10:56:30 PM PST by MJY1288
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: MJY1288

So anyone can do it as long as they don't trash the thread? I didn't take offense to it REALLY. I thought it was kinda cute! I'm the NUBIE!! = )


26 posted on 02/18/2005 11:01:19 PM PST by Fatigued Mother
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Fatigued Mother
Click on KEYWORD and see for yourself :-)

I never add keywords..... My first post to you is proof of that, As you can see.... I have no problem jumping right in and making a fool of myself :-)

27 posted on 02/18/2005 11:09:36 PM PST by MJY1288
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Dolphy
One of the more interesting things I've seen is the addition of V.A. health clinics. I don't know how well it's working, but it's a great idea. Instead of trudging into the VA hospital for everything illness it is supposed to be like going to the doctor.

They are opening them in areas where there are clusters of eligible vets.

28 posted on 02/18/2005 11:19:41 PM PST by USNBandit (sarcasm engaged at all times)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: USNBandit
Cheaper too I'd think without the weight overhead and improvements needed at the big facilities.
29 posted on 02/19/2005 12:15:51 AM PST by endthematrix (Declare 2005 as the year the battle for freedom from tax slavery!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: MJY1288

I believe ya! :-D


30 posted on 02/19/2005 6:16:53 AM PST by Fatigued Mother
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: USNBandit

Bandit, I have a friend who is particularly frustrated in his "wait" for his medical care. He has some kind of "gulf war syndrome" and he says that they aren't taking care of it. On the other hand, I have known many Vets that say that their every healthcare need is taken care of completely. I do think it should be our biggest priority to take care of our own first. If taking care of our veterns means taking money away from foreign things, I'm all for it. Guess since it is only a bill that hasn't even been passed yet, we will wait and see what happens! = )


31 posted on 02/19/2005 6:26:17 AM PST by Fatigued Mother
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Fatigued Mother
I believe there are two levels of payment, one for combat veterans and one for non combat veterans. Combat veterans don't pay co payments or the $250 fee. I'm a non combat veteran and I don't believe I should be treated the same as those guys that have put their lives on the line. Why should I be given free health care for spending two years in the officers'club at Fort Knox.
32 posted on 02/19/2005 7:53:43 AM PST by PolishProud (A little song, a little dance, a little seltzer down your pants)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fatigued Mother
I believe there are two levels of payment, one for combat veterans and one for non combat veterans. Combat veterans don't pay co payments or the $250 fee. I'm a non combat veteran and I don't believe I should be treated the same as those guys that have put their lives on the line. Why should I be given free health care for spending two years in the officers'club at Fort Knox.
33 posted on 02/19/2005 7:53:47 AM PST by PolishProud (A little song, a little dance, a little seltzer down your pants)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: USNBandit
I remember watching a hearing discussing the clinics. They are supposed to be more responsive and reach more people. Of course the Dems were complaining but it seemed to me that on the whole they would be a real improvement.
34 posted on 02/19/2005 8:18:36 AM PST by Dolphy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: PolishProud

Polish Proud, good point... and good point. hehehe

Polish, whether or not you put your life on the line or not, you served your country well. ; ) Very noble statements though! My friend is a combat veteran. He says he has "gulf war syndrome" and says he is not getting the healthcare he needs. He just retired from the Army last year.

Truly, the hate that the liberals feel for the President control them to a point where they can stare at an apple and call it a banana just because George W said it was an apple. Some of them have their dukes up when there is nothing to fight about and no one to fight with! I honestly believe that if they would just get informed, opinions would change and it boggles me why people WANT to stay blind to truth. We live in a world where it is all about what we feel. What is right and true has to take a back seat so the rest of the world won't get their feelings hurt.


35 posted on 02/19/2005 8:53:53 AM PST by Fatigued Mother
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Dolphy
The demographics of WWII, Korean and Vietnam vets is such that more WWII vets are dying faster that younger vets (boomers) reach retirement ... and high health care cost ... age range. Thus, the VA budget should be temporarily reduced with no cut in services.

Historically, VA hospitals are the most inefficient hospitals in the nation. They are the best domestic argument against socialized medicine. A siginificant portion of their customers are habitual malingerers.

Suppose we make a distinction between 4 categories of vets.
Those who were injured in combat and while properly performing their assigned duties
Those injured in drunken traffic accidents and other negligence while in the service
Those who suffer from real or imagined "stress syndrome".
Those who suffered no injury which is 90% of us, including me. (I cannot blame my insanity on my service in Vietnam. It was a pre-existing condition.)

Clearly the first group deserves taxpayer care ... preferably in private hospitals and not socialist hospitals. But under what morality or illogic do the other three groups .... especially the last group that includes most of us .... deserve socialist healthcare?

36 posted on 02/19/2005 11:00:11 AM PST by spintreebob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: spintreebob
But under what morality or illogic do the other three groups .... especially the last group that includes most of us .... deserve socialist healthcare?

You are likely much more informed than I am on this subject. I certainly agree that service provider redundancy makes absolutely no sense.

37 posted on 02/19/2005 11:41:14 AM PST by Dolphy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: spintreebob

Very intresting points guys! Thanks so much from your input. I learned a lot in this discussion. Thank you so much for serving our country. = )


38 posted on 02/20/2005 2:37:01 PM PST by Fatigued Mother
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-38 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson