Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Intercepting Fist
g2mil.com ^ | Spring 2005 | Carlton Meyer

Posted on 01/21/2005 8:34:04 PM PST by Destro

Editorial

Bruce Lee was a great warrior. He was not a military man, but fought serious street brawls while growing up in Hong Kong, mastered all forms of close combat, and earned a college degree in philosophy. He eventually developed his own martial arts style which he called, "The Way of the Intercepting Fist." This principle is that a counterattack is the best form of fighting. Stand on the defensive until your opponent commits himself to striking, which leaves him open to an intercepting blow. Lee's conclusion was probably influenced by ancient Chinese warrior Sun Tzu who wrote: "In ground which offers no advantage to either side we should lure the enemy by feigned departure, wait until half his force has come out, and make an intercepting attack."

Western military thought emphasizes the offense, despite the historical success of counteroffensives. A major application of this strategy was by the Russians in 1942. As powerful German armored forces moved beyond Stalingrad, the Russians realized that a counterstroke along the lengthy German flank would be more effective than moving forces far to the southeast to defend against German armor. It was much easier to strike south into the long German flank. This resulted in the complete encirclement and surrender of the German 6th Army, while powerful German tanks were abandoned far to the east from a lack of fuel and supplies.

Starting the 1943, the greatly outnumbered Germans learned to use the intercepting fist as well, which they referred to as "mobile defense." Since the Germans lacked the resources to mount offensives, they found it easier to wait for the Russians to expose themselves with offensive thrusts, avoid their armored spearheads, then counterattack into their exposed flanks to maul Russian rear area troops and roll up the spearheads from behind. This led to political fights with Hitler who hated giving up ground and loved the idea of massive offensive operations rather than counterattacks.

German Generals wanted to use "mobile defense" against the Allies who had overextended their lines around Aachen in 1944. However, Hitler insisted on a major offensive in the Ardennes which ultimately failed. During that offensive, the Allies could have used an intercepting fist to surround German forces, but used reserves to block the German spearheads. This led to the bloodiest fighting on the western front and allowed German forces to gradually withdraw in good order. A bold Allied commander could have let the Germans advance while Patton rolled up their flank from the South. The farther German panzers advanced toward Antwerp, the farther they would have had to retreat to prevent encirclement. The Allies could have trapped the entire German force by letting their spearheads advance with an intercepting fist from the south.

There are many other examples from the second World War where an intercepting fist could have been used. When Douglas MacArthur's forces in the Philippines pulled back into the Bataan peninsula in 1942, they were able to repel repeated enemy attacks. However, they began to run out of food after several months while the Japanese attacked repeatedly with heavy losses. Although they outnumbered the Japanese attackers, the rough terrain and total Japanese naval and air superiority made offensive operations impossible. Rather than surrender from a lack of food, the Americans could have allowed the Japanese to breakthrough into a trap and used counterattacks encircled them. While the chances of success are debatable, it was a better idea than surrendering to a Japanese Army that killed most prisoners.

Likewise, the Korean war stalemate during 1952 and 1953 provided many chances where an intercepting fist would have been effective. Allied forces turned back many Chinese offensives with heavy firepower and blocking movements leading to a stalemate. If the Allies had used a SunTzu tactic and lured the Chinese into a false sense of accomplishment by withdrawing in the face of an attack, much of the Chinese Army could have been trapped and strangled. As 12 of 13 North Vietnamese divisions advanced on Saigon in 1975, the US military contemplated an intercepting fist. A Marine Corps division could have landed just north of the DMZ, and pressed westward to cut off supplies. This was rejected for political reasons, but may have stalled the North Vietnamese offensive way down South.

The intercepting fist is the ideal strategy for America's concept of rapid deployment forces. Early arriving forces are light and lack supplies needed for prolonged defensive engagements. Tossing them in front of enemy spearheads is foolish. Even mighty American airborne forces considered themselves mere "speed bumps" if Iraqi armored divisions had pushed south from Kuwait in 1990. Counterattack is a better strategy in such cases as the further enemy forces rapidly advance, the more vulnerable the become. Of course politics comes into play as enemy objectives may be deemed essential to defend. In such cases, light "guard battalions" equipped and trained for rearguard actions are best. Nevertheless, offensive oriented Generals must learn that an intercepting fist is often the best tactic.

Carlton Meyer editor@G2mil.com

G2mil editorials may be freely distributed without permission

G2mil is the only Warfare Research Portal on the Internet. If you are interested in military technology, weapons, tactics, future warfare, and military news, this website has hundreds of pages of unique content and links to hundreds of military related sites. This is not a government or corporate website, but an independent website run by former military officers.

Our editor is Carlton Meyer, a former Marine Corps officer who has participated in military operations around the world. He had written dozens of articles for military magazines, but became frustrated that important issues are ignored by editors fearful of upsetting their corporate advertisers or government sponsors. There are no advertisers or sponsors for G2mil, so click here MAGAZINE to read the current issue.


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: brucelee; military

1 posted on 01/21/2005 8:34:05 PM PST by Destro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Destro

I guess using the Battle of The Bulge as an example wouldn't have proved the point


2 posted on 01/21/2005 8:37:41 PM PST by stylin19a (Marines - end of discussion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stylin19a
course, they called it an offensive rather than a counteroffensive. How would i know the difference ?
3 posted on 01/21/2005 8:40:35 PM PST by stylin19a (Marines - end of discussion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: stylin19a
Well many think Ike screwed up in not pinching the German salient/bulge off and instead opted to slug it out with the Germans frontally.
4 posted on 01/21/2005 8:40:55 PM PST by Destro (Know your enemy! Help fight Islamic terrorism by visiting johnathangaltfilms.com and jihadwatch.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Destro

Damn. With a title like "Intercepting Fist," I thought this was going to be another Morford article!


5 posted on 01/21/2005 8:41:17 PM PST by Clemenza (Europhiles and Monarchists should be purged)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Destro

[He eventually developed his own martial arts style which he called, "The Way of the Intercepting Fist." This principle is that a counterattack is the best form of fighting.]

I think this is exactly right.

When an enemy commits himself to a strike, and you are in knowledgeable anticipation of it, you have the advantage and can use this advantage to take your opponent to the ground where he can no longer be a threat.


6 posted on 01/21/2005 8:51:52 PM PST by spinestein
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Destro
"The Way of the Intercepting Fist." This principle is that a counterattack is the best form of fighting. Stand on the defensive until your opponent commits himself to striking, which leaves him open to an intercepting blow.

Speaking of China and Chinese... Counterattacking is great, but what if you don't know your enemy is attacking you until you are hit? And what if that single hit is fatal?

The trick is to become so powerful as to make no one want to come near you, let alone fight you. We are becoming weak, while China is becoming strong. If the status quo remains, they will start with assymetrical warfare, and finish the job with conventional forces.

7 posted on 01/21/2005 9:05:52 PM PST by Captainpaintball (The Al Sharpton Show: Three hours a day...That's all I AXE!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Captainpaintball

Be like water - Bruce Lee.


8 posted on 01/21/2005 9:34:12 PM PST by Destro (Know your enemy! Help fight Islamic terrorism by visiting johnathangaltfilms.com and jihadwatch.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Destro
Well many think Ike screwed up in not pinching the German salient/bulge off and instead opted to slug it out with the Germans frontally.

Don't you just love Monday morning quartebacks? Equipped with the knowledge of hindsight, they always know how everyone else should have reacted in the heat of battle.

Now if Ike had had a time machine...

9 posted on 01/21/2005 11:57:25 PM PST by Jeff Chandler (No tagline needed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Chandler

That statement is ignorant of the histpry - no Monday morning quartebacking at all - generals confornted Ike about his strategy and he overruled them.


10 posted on 01/22/2005 12:13:46 AM PST by Destro (Know your enemy! Help fight Islamic terrorism by visiting johnathangaltfilms.com and jihadwatch.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Destro
generals confornted Ike about his strategy and he overruled them.

Documentation?

11 posted on 01/22/2005 12:19:13 AM PST by Jeff Chandler (No tagline needed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Chandler

BTW, Bruce Lee didn't develop his own style out of thin air, he merely adapted Wing Chung Kung Fu, which puts emphasis on the counter punch.

Also, the concept of the conteroffensive was not invented by Lee, or even Sun Tzu. It is common to all sophisticated martial arts.


12 posted on 01/22/2005 12:24:32 AM PST by Jeff Chandler (No tagline needed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Destro

Dragon bump!


13 posted on 01/22/2005 12:26:32 AM PST by RandallFlagg (Roll your own cigarettes! You'll save bucks and smoke less!(Magnetic bumper stickers-click my name)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Chandler
Yea, read a book: Armageddon: The Battle for Germany, 1944-1945 General Bradley was right and Ike was wrong.
14 posted on 01/22/2005 1:12:16 AM PST by Destro (Know your enemy! Help fight Islamic terrorism by visiting johnathangaltfilms.com and jihadwatch.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Destro

A review of the book states that Bradley was the General who wanted to pinch off the Buldge. You are aware that it was Bradley who left the Ardennes vulnerable in the first place?


15 posted on 01/22/2005 1:39:22 AM PST by Jeff Chandler (No tagline needed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Chandler

apples and oranges - we are talking about how the allied generals wanted to push back the Germans - not what made the Germans attack there in the first place.


16 posted on 01/22/2005 11:28:28 AM PST by Destro (Know your enemy! Help fight Islamic terrorism by visiting johnathangaltfilms.com and jihadwatch.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Destro
Hitler's plan depended on speed. His goal was to retake Antwerp and encircle the Allies. He thought that this would cause disputes among the Allies, fracturing their coalition. This would buy him time to develop his advanced weaponry, muster more troops, and face the Russians with the full force of his troops.

By standing their ground against the German troops, the American troops, though largely green, accomplished the task of disrupting Hitler's timetable for the offensive, which destroyed his hope for victory.

In other words, slowing down the offensive was an effective strategy.
17 posted on 01/22/2005 12:13:08 PM PST by Jeff Chandler (No tagline needed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Chandler
again - you are arguing something else - I was talking about Ike's plan after the German's offensive was stopped and the Allies plans for a counter attack.
18 posted on 01/22/2005 12:20:44 PM PST by Destro (Know your enemy! Help fight Islamic terrorism by visiting johnathangaltfilms.com and jihadwatch.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Destro

read later


19 posted on 01/22/2005 10:54:12 PM PST by LiteKeeper (Secularization of America is happening)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson