Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Apple announces $499 Macintosh
AppleInsider ^ | January 11, 2005

Posted on 01/11/2005 10:49:21 AM PST by HAL9000

Preliminary info from MacWorld Expo -

Jobs introduces Mac mini. New member of Mac family including a slot-load Combo optical drive, FireWire, ethernet, USB 2.o, both DVI/VGA output. It plays DVDs, burn CDs, and is very quiet and tiny. Its height is half the size of an iPod mini. Jobs calls it "BYODKM" -- Bring Your Own Display, Keyboard, Mouse. Will come in two models: 1.25GHz 256MB/40GB for $499. A second model with a 1.4GHz, more memory and larger hard drive will sell for $599. Mac mini will ship on January 22. Ships in a box smaller than the regular iPod box.



TOPICS: Computers/Internet
KEYWORDS: apple; kneepads; littleprecious; mac; macintosh; macuser; paidshill; redmondpayroll; trollfromredmond
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 281-300 next last
To: Swordmaker

Like I said, we don't do Macs on our network. I have no experience with OSX Macs, although I've had to deal with older Macs on occasion for friends. I do know that everyone I know who has A. dealt with Macs in a network and B. isn't a dedicated Mac guru or network know-it-all has had issues, too.

Look, keep your Macs. Be happy that you have a tiny market share so you don't get spyware written for them. Unless I get an up-close look at one of these machines, including a look inside, I'm not going to waste any time wondering if it would make me feel warm inside to own one.


161 posted on 01/11/2005 6:37:24 PM PST by JenB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies]

To: KwasiOwusu
These things are not even measured on this scale. Honestly, I am glad you like Dell's. I own Mac's, PC's running Windows and Linux .. and pretty much use what I need when I need it. You have to have used a Mac to understand why folks are so hard headed about them. Its not about spec's. It just isn't. People were buying Macs when they ran at 1/3 the speed of the available window's boxes.. and got more done. And thats when they crashed every hour.. thank God those days are over. (At least I do) But that isn't the case now. P4's are optimized for clock speed, not performance because this is how folks who don't know better compare cpu's. Mac's use PowerPC processors which are RISC based and they get alot more done per clock cycle, especially when it comes to processing certain types of data. The new G5's are true 64bit processors and the operating system is getting better and better tuned to take advantage of this. Whereas, its pretty much useless to run Windows on a 64bit processor, at least for now.

Every computer is a pain in the butt. Depending on what you use it for, one will be better suited for your needs. But there are basic facts. Mac's take alot less service than PC's. The owners are passionately loyal despite active discrimination everywhere.

I haven't had a virus or a spyware on any Mac I have worked with for 5 years now. And I work with hundreds of them. I can time on a one minute stop watch how long a bare windows system takes to get infected on the internet after connect.

But, folks have experiences all over the board. Enjoy your windows. There are all sorts of benefits for using it. If you decide to actually try a Mac and use it for some time.. then we can talk about comparative specs.. but frankly.. most of these numbers being hashed back and forth are pretty much meaningless in comparing the two.

if you were interested in this little box, I would recommend upgrading the RAM to 512MB min.. this is just a must with OS X unless you are just planning to web browse and chat. But above 512MB.. you shouldn't need to go with this box.. because that is territory for gamers and graphic artists and perhaps intense database and spreadsheet crunching.. In that case.. you would want a G5 and not be cheap. Otherwise, this is a pretty cool box.

162 posted on 01/11/2005 6:45:23 PM PST by dalight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: daviddennis
But they have no heart, and they've squeezed the heart and the joy out of many formerly innovative companies.

Ok are we all supposed to burst into Kumbuya now?I think both of these platforms and all the OSs including Linux have thier up's and down's.Windows or the "wintel" boxes as they are refered to,their strength is compatability with most software and hardware and they are pretty easy to use abuse and modify.Their weakness is security but with the excellant collection of free security tools available now it's almost a non issue.Macs on the other hand their strength is stability and security and they are also easy to use .Their weakness's are compatability although that seems to be getting better,but they just cost too damn much.Too much for a newbie with limited income and too much for experianced user who can put together something with more power for less money.Then theres Linux and all it's variants, plenty secure, plenty stable but it also has compatability issues with both hardware and software and at least for me it's like learning a foriegn language.When they come up with an install program that's as easy to use as windows and doesn't require you to enter a bunch of secret codes like your launching a nuclear missle I'm all over it.

163 posted on 01/11/2005 6:48:33 PM PST by edchambers (l)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: JenB
Like I said, we don't do Macs on our network.

I see plenty of documentation for Macs at the csu.edu web site. Perhaps they are connecting to your network without problems and simply don't need any support from your department.

164 posted on 01/11/2005 6:52:03 PM PST by HAL9000 (Spreading terrorist beheading propaganda videos is an Act of Treason!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 161 | View Replies]

To: Bloody Sam Roberts

You can get a PS2 to USB adapter.. as for the 9 pin serial mouse.. it still works? send it to a museum! Gosh..


165 posted on 01/11/2005 6:53:57 PM PST by dalight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: HAL9000

Our department has its own network. People are free to connect their Macs, we just don't support them.


166 posted on 01/11/2005 6:57:43 PM PST by JenB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies]

To: dalight
...as for the 9 pin serial mouse.. it still works?

You'd be amazed at what I have collected in my basement.

167 posted on 01/11/2005 7:03:35 PM PST by Bloody Sam Roberts (All I ask from livin' is to have no chains on me. All I ask from dyin' is to go naturally.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 165 | View Replies]

To: Bloody Sam Roberts
You'd be amazed at what I have collected in my basement

Not me, he says as he cuts and pastes with a nine pin serial track ball.

168 posted on 01/11/2005 7:10:03 PM PST by edchambers (l)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies]

To: HAL9000
A few years later, they decided that Microsoft invented the mouse, so it must be okay to use one. <.i>

At home I use a Mac ... 5 of them now. At work, a PC. After my G5, the PC monitor looks like a screen of colored sand ... I slog through programs at work. How do normal people put up with PCs? Just cheap I guess. ;-)

169 posted on 01/11/2005 7:11:49 PM PST by BunnySlippers (When it comes to humility, I'm the greatest! - Bullwinkle J. Moose)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: JenB
Soyou have proven our point. You complaints are with OLD Macs(OS 9.2 and prior) and your "problems" simply are not true anymore with OS X.

Imagine, if you will, the best XP setup you can possibly get. Then imagine all the features you would ever want to have. Now take that, and get rid of all the bloat and virus worries, and you have OS X. Stop being a M$ Luddite, and give OS X a try.

170 posted on 01/11/2005 7:11:53 PM PST by SengirV
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 161 | View Replies]

To: edchambers
...a nine pin serial track ball.

Ohhh...another Old Schooler, eh?

171 posted on 01/11/2005 7:12:59 PM PST by Bloody Sam Roberts (All I ask from livin' is to have no chains on me. All I ask from dyin' is to go naturally.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 168 | View Replies]

To: JenB
I guarantee that the mac's are not giving you networking problems.. not OS X based ones.. this is just IT snobbery, nothing new about that though.

As for developing code.. uh.. unless we are talking about developing in Visual(take your pick) which requires Windoze.. I cannot see why anyone would touch a windows box.. well one reason. TextPad.. the best piece of development software ever developed.. and this is only available on a PC.. much to my chagrin.

But, other than Textpad.. and Microcentric apps.. there is nothing to recommend windows as a development platform over another. Frankly Linux or OS X are better because you can have multiple virtual machines running test OS Boxes WinXP, Win2K, etc that you can shut down in a specific state, save, copy and test from the same point over and over again.

And try popping a hard drive out of one PC and put it into a whole different model with different hardware and see if it starts, much less runs without a hitch. This is normal on a Mac. God help you on a PC..

172 posted on 01/11/2005 7:13:33 PM PST by dalight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: JenB
I have no experience with OSX Macs, although I've had to deal with older Macs on occasion for friends.

So in other words you don't have any basis for saying that Mac's cause problems on a TCP/IP network unless you go back 4 years..

Be happy that you have a tiny market share so you don't get spyware written for them.

Come on, as the vaunted systems administrator on this thread you know better than that. Unix uses a completely different security model than Windows so to say that market share is the determining factor in a systems susceptibility is just plain stupid..

. Unless I get an up-close look at one of these machines, including a look inside, I'm not going to waste any time wondering if it would make me feel warm inside to own one.

You have every right to stay ignorant about the other technologies out there. As I have said you can also decide to reduce complexity you don't want them on your network. But don't act like you have a basis to form a professional opinion on the technical merits of OSX when you have never even used it.

173 posted on 01/11/2005 7:14:44 PM PST by N3WBI3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 161 | View Replies]

To: JenB
Like I said, we don't do Macs on our network. I have no experience with OSX Macs, although I've had to deal with older Macs on occasion for friends.

Since you have NO EXPERIENCE with an operating system that has been in use for 4 years, what are you doing on this thread spreading your ignorance? You make sweeping statements about connectivity, "not playing nice", and Macs having "issues", speaking ex cathedra, claiming "networking" expertise, when you have no experience from which to speak... and arguing with those of us WHO DO HAVE THE EXPERIENCE and the expertise.

Be happy that you have a tiny market share so you don't get spyware written for them.

Your citing the myth of "security by obscurity" demonstrates again your ignorance of the basic security built into to BSDUnix and OSX. In four years no one has been able to create a self-installing spyware/adware program for OSX. Yet you ASSUME that it is merely that the programers who create such vileness just ignore the Mac market because it is less than 4% of the market. That canard has been shot down many times... and the evidence is that there are, as yet, no candidate programs to prove it can be done.

You admit that you have not even had a "close up look" at a modern Mac, yet you feel comfortable advising people as to their suitability for various uses. That is arogant and willful ignorance. It has become apparent that "what you know" is based on hearsay, antique information, or myth.

174 posted on 01/11/2005 7:18:03 PM PST by Swordmaker (Tagline now open, please ring bell.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 161 | View Replies]

To: ThinkDifferent

Well.. I am not sure Apple didn't make a big thing of this just to cause a little stir to get folks interested in this announcement. The rumor sites and Apple play cat and mouse all of the time. Apple will be really worried if nothing leaked.. or the rumor sites closed down.. this would be the end of days for them..


175 posted on 01/11/2005 7:22:44 PM PST by dalight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: cowboyway

It's a joke.

The comment is a satirical look at a stereotypical computer geek, notably the Mac user that's in fewer and fewer number just like Beta videotape users.

Nothing more than that.


176 posted on 01/11/2005 7:24:42 PM PST by Chummy (Liberals -- the other Red meat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: Swordmaker
Why should I have to like Macs? I don't. I rather hate that OS - and yes, I've "used" OSX, not willingly of course. I don't like Macs. I like Windows. I have no hatred for Bill Gates. I love being able to build my own box exactly the way I want it. And like someone upthread, I need Java 1.5 this semester and Mac can't give me that.
177 posted on 01/11/2005 7:31:09 PM PST by JenB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 174 | View Replies]

To: JenB
and yes, I've "used" OSX, not willingly of course.

uh but in post 161 you said "I have no experience with OSX Macs, although I've had to deal with older Macs on occasion for friends."

I don't like Macs.

Good for you

I like Windows.

Also good for you, nobody here cares what you like, what got you in trouble is you spoke about all the networking issues mac has had when you have no experience with OSX (or you do, it all depends on which post we read).

And like someone upthread, I need Java 1.5 this semester and Mac can't give me that.

Wow good for you a quasi informed statement about why you wont use Macs other than 'I dont like them', or 'their software stinks' (without any experience or reference... Many Mac users are furious about 1.5 not being on Panther (Including a few developers where I work)..

178 posted on 01/11/2005 7:42:21 PM PST by N3WBI3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 177 | View Replies]

To: dalight
try popping a hard drive out of one PC and put it into a whole different model with different hardware and see if it starts,

Been there done that, and yes they will start but usually only with a boot disk and only long enough to format and install an OS but what do want from a used hard drive.You can in fact build a decent PC out of old junkers scrounged from a salvage yard or landfill.Try that with a Mac.

179 posted on 01/11/2005 7:50:56 PM PST by edchambers (l)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 172 | View Replies]

To: JenB
We refuse to service Macs because it just adds to our headaches, espcially with networking.

I know, that damn stable BSD networking is always such a headache. BTW, it's pretty much as easy to connect a Mac to a PC network as it is a PC.

180 posted on 01/11/2005 7:51:31 PM PST by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 281-300 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson