Skip to comments.
Common grammar and usage errors
12/22/04
| Self
Posted on 12/22/2004 9:32:13 AM PST by georgiadevildog
I am starting a grammar thread at the behest of Xenalyte and TheMom. Post your most irritating pet peeves of grammar or usage here.
TOPICS: Chit/Chat; Education; Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: allyourbase; aybabtu; bare; barebutt; bear; bearbutt; beesting; but; butt; cheese; computergeeks; geeks; grammar; grammer; grammergeeks; hammer; hi; high; howardhuges; huge; hugh; hughhefner; hughjackman; loose; lose; loss; me; meandmike; mike; mikeandme; mine; moose; moosecheese; saycheese; series; serious; spellinbe; spellingbeehive; stupidvanity; their; there; usage; whatyousay; your; youre
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160, 161-180, 181-200, 201-211 next last
I have drunk 8 beers. It just doesn't sound right.
181
posted on
01/21/2005 1:48:05 PM PST
by
TerP26
To: georgiadevildog
182
posted on
02/25/2005 1:20:23 PM PST
by
arthurus
(Better to fight them over THERE than over HERE.)
To: Mr. K
"To eggs is two many too eat""To eggs is two much too eat"
183
posted on
02/25/2005 1:26:48 PM PST
by
arthurus
(Better to fight them over THERE than over HERE.)
To: georgiadevildog
cents, scents, sense, sinceSince only fits in this progression in some parts of the South where all four words are pronounced "sints" or "see-ints."
184
posted on
02/25/2005 1:31:23 PM PST
by
arthurus
(Better to fight them over THERE than over HERE.)
To: Dan from Michigan
What in the hell is a "looser"One who releases could be called a looser.
185
posted on
02/25/2005 1:32:40 PM PST
by
arthurus
(Better to fight them over THERE than over HERE.)
To: jellybean
"Here, here" as a gesture of agreement to the comments of another, I don't know which to use. How about "Hear here!!"?
It's "Hear! hear!" and is a command to listen to what the speaker has said.
186
posted on
02/25/2005 1:35:57 PM PST
by
arthurus
(Better to fight them over THERE than over HERE.)
To: escapefromboston
if it wasn't for them If it weren't for them...
187
posted on
02/25/2005 1:37:25 PM PST
by
arthurus
(Better to fight them over THERE than over HERE.)
To: georgiadevildog
medal, metal, meddle, mettleThree of these, at least, come from the same root and have essentially the same meaning. Meddle is different.
188
posted on
02/25/2005 1:39:57 PM PST
by
arthurus
(Better to fight them over THERE than over HERE.)
To: georgiadevildog
Actually, either is correct, depending on whether you refer to the two individual eggs or to the single meal composed of the eggs.
189
posted on
02/25/2005 1:42:18 PM PST
by
arthurus
(Better to fight them over THERE than over HERE.)
To: georgiadevildog
Using commas between two independent clauses (instead of semicolons).
Writing "irregardless."
If anybody has a problem with using sentence fragments, like I did in this post, tough.
190
posted on
02/25/2005 1:44:47 PM PST
by
rwfromkansas
("War is an ugly thing, but...the decayed feeling...which thinks nothing worth war, is worse." -Mill)
To: munchtipq
For a proper dictionarỳou have to go back to Webster's Second International. Throw out the Third. It enshrines any word or usage that has been published twice or is known to the editors to have been spoken ten or a dozen times.
191
posted on
02/25/2005 1:44:54 PM PST
by
arthurus
(Better to fight them over THERE than over HERE.)
To: arthurus
Ef it WUZZEN'T fo' dem...
To: holymoly
The act of conspiring together is redundant. Conspiring is not an activity accomplished alone.
193
posted on
02/25/2005 1:49:45 PM PST
by
arthurus
(Better to fight them over THERE than over HERE.)
To: Yo-Yo
All y'all = everybody Yall and allayall are my preferred constructions because "yall" hereabouts is not used with any sense that it is a contraction. It is simply the correct second person plural pronoun. Allayall indicates everyone in the group spoken to and is more congruent with the actual spoken term.
194
posted on
02/25/2005 1:57:30 PM PST
by
arthurus
(Better to fight them over THERE than over HERE.)
To: georgiadevildog
Is there a TRASH section this could be placed under?
195
posted on
02/25/2005 1:58:53 PM PST
by
cynicom
(<p)
To: georgiadevildog
Who and whom
Who is SUBJECTIVE
Whom is OBJECTIVE
Using the two terms properly is not difficult.
Just isolate the phrase/clause using who or whom and replace who or whom with a name, such as "Bob." Then, say it as a sentence, which often requires changing the word order. If Bob is subjective, use who. If objective, use whom.
Example:
I wonder who is going to the party.
Next step:
I wonder Bob is going to the party.
Isolate: "Bob is going to the party."
Since Bob is the subject there, it should be who.
Next example:
You are dating whom?
In sentence form, it stays the same....you are dating whom.
You are dating Bob.
Thus, since Bob is objective, we use "whom."
196
posted on
02/25/2005 2:01:16 PM PST
by
rwfromkansas
("War is an ugly thing, but...the decayed feeling...which thinks nothing worth war, is worse." -Mill)
To: ken21
There is one reporter for my college newspaper who makes the same mistake all the time. I constantly have to fix the errors.
197
posted on
02/25/2005 2:07:31 PM PST
by
rwfromkansas
("War is an ugly thing, but...the decayed feeling...which thinks nothing worth war, is worse." -Mill)
To: Petronski
Good catches. I am sure I heard those before, but I still make the mistakes.
IIRC, datum is singular for data.
Collective nouns can be tricky as well.
198
posted on
02/25/2005 2:10:13 PM PST
by
rwfromkansas
("War is an ugly thing, but...the decayed feeling...which thinks nothing worth war, is worse." -Mill)
To: Mike Bates
Are you guys ready to orderThis is a Yankee misusage. The correct is "Are yall ready to order?" and it iscertainly more euphonious, especially when spoken by a female waitcreature from Birmingham or Hattiesburg.
199
posted on
02/25/2005 2:11:14 PM PST
by
arthurus
(Better to fight them over THERE than over HERE.)
To: fishtank
Well, that rule is rarely taught these days.
Grammar evolves, and much like the split infinitive, it is becoming acceptable, even to teachers, to use an article at the beginning of some sentences.
I do not use it often, but I do sometimes when I want to emphasize a point. Contrary to what some say, a strong "and" at the beginning of a sentence actually strengthens it by tying the sentences together more effectively.
One should not use "and" at the beginning sentence often, but if you write a column, I see nothing lazy about using it once or twice. Such usage actually can strengthen your writing, not weaken it. But, the word must be used carefully and sparingly to introduce sentences.
200
posted on
02/25/2005 2:15:03 PM PST
by
rwfromkansas
("War is an ugly thing, but...the decayed feeling...which thinks nothing worth war, is worse." -Mill)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160, 161-180, 181-200, 201-211 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson