Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 10/28/2004 10:52:57 AM PDT by crushelits
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: crushelits

Too bad Kerry doesn't go into detail about his policies.


2 posted on 10/28/2004 10:54:27 AM PDT by blakep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: crushelits

a draft would weaken our military....a kerry goal is to finish

what jimmah carter and the klintoons started.


3 posted on 10/28/2004 10:55:13 AM PDT by kingattax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: crushelits

Why is Ron Silver the only one saying this?


6 posted on 10/28/2004 10:57:14 AM PDT by CzarNicky (The problem with bad ideas is that they seemed like good ideas at the time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: crushelits
It's not only the 40,000 new troops that Kerry has committed to provide.....

I think that thousands of US soldiers will decide that they do not want to serve under Kerry and will opt out of the service at the earliest possible opportunity.

Who will he replace these soldiers with - certainly it won't be liberal volunteers!!

7 posted on 10/28/2004 10:57:23 AM PDT by HardStarboard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: crushelits

Isn't it Ron Silva?


9 posted on 10/28/2004 10:58:06 AM PDT by eyespysomething (Idealism is fine, but as it approaches reality the cost becomes prohibitive.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: crushelits

I can see it now: "During the campaign my opponent came up with the idea of reinstituing the draft..."


10 posted on 10/28/2004 10:58:33 AM PDT by CaptRon (Pedecaris alive or Raisuli dead)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: crushelits

not to mention all the soldiers, sailors, and marines that won't re-up because they can't stand the thought of serving under a traitor for CIC.


11 posted on 10/28/2004 11:00:00 AM PDT by flashbunny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: crushelits

Good for Ron. After dirty trickster Charlie Rangel put forward a bill to re-instate the draft it became clear that it was only dems. that were disengenuously trying to muddy the water and imply that this was a bush supported idea. Even after bush clearly stated in the debates that the draft was not necessary, Kerry kept insisting that this was bush's idea, presumably in an effort to fool the MTV generation. Fortunatly, no one was fooled, but it's good that Silver made sure the message got out.


12 posted on 10/28/2004 11:00:48 AM PDT by orangelobster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: crushelits

Hi Ho Silver!!


13 posted on 10/28/2004 11:01:41 AM PDT by Bearshouse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: crushelits

i really dont remember when but didnt a few months ago kerry propose something about a mandatory service for all men 18 and older? maybe im crazy but i swore he announced that somewhere.


14 posted on 10/28/2004 11:01:45 AM PDT by philsfan24
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: crushelits
Kerry wouldn't have to promise to increase troop population by 40,000 to incur a draft. If Kerry were to win, the majority of folks currently in the military would be abandoning in droves.

That would leave no choice but to draft UNWILLING, UNSKILLED, UNTRAINED, UNEDUCATED men and women into the forces.

Due to the vast array of technical equipment in use today, training of a military person takes a longer time, and depends on the skills a person has.

This would mean a WEAK, poorly trained, and UNWILLING military force, that would quickly become THIRD RATE.

Soon aftr, the US would become a THIRD RATE POWER in the world, forced to KOWTOW to the UN, which is just what KERRY HAS BEEN PLANNING ALL ALONG.

15 posted on 10/28/2004 11:02:26 AM PDT by UCANSEE2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: crushelits

The very point I've made more than once.

Yep, when you have all the volunteers who want to go into the military already in the military, and you announce that you ARE going to increase the military, how is that going to happen?

Draft.

Dan


21 posted on 10/28/2004 11:06:19 AM PDT by BibChr ("...behold, they have rejected the word of the LORD, so what wisdom is in them?" [Jer. 8:9])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: crushelits
At last! Someone makes an obvious and telling point -- expanding the Army will be payback to Wesley Clark, Shinseki, and other Kerry generals, but it will almost certainly take a draft to raise the troops and years to train and equip them. But from the start -- and this is the selling point -- it will provide more promotional opportunities for the Army's officer corps.
32 posted on 10/28/2004 11:58:58 AM PDT by Rockingham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: crushelits

There's one other possibility for Kerry to reach that 40K number --- it's called Stop-Loss. The basically tell all troops that they are in for the duration of the 'crisis'. And this is exactly what they have been howling about in the limited cases where the Bush Administration has used this power. Kerry would just broaden the use of Stop-Loss.


33 posted on 10/28/2004 12:33:33 PM PDT by Tallguy (If the Kerry campaign implodes any further, they'll reach the point of "singularity" by election day)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: crushelits

Karry did his duty in Vietnam
Mc.Cain fell down in a parashuot in a lake in Hanoi
Alexander Haig was General in Vietnam.
If just one of these brave men where selectet as president
That would bee a victory.


35 posted on 10/28/2004 1:27:10 PM PDT by norrestrand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson