Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

advice needed selling a domain name: OOP.COM
self ^ | 09/16/2004 | self

Posted on 09/16/2004 7:39:45 AM PDT by Theo

As a result of the dissolution of the internet startup I worked for, 4 of us original employees have gained ownership of the company's domain name: OOP.COM

I'm in the process of determining how best to sell it. I've gotten evaluations of between $2,500 and $55,000. Anyone have any suggestions?


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: domainname; objectoriented; oop; oopcom; url
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 last
To: manic4organic
>>>>>>poop.com. Now THAT would be worth something.

And it works with the AMERICAN-MADE version, with WORLDWIDE DISTRIBUTION possibilities.....

41 posted on 09/16/2004 8:27:02 AM PDT by Vetnet ("Into this Mosaic of Freedom is laid, this precious piece of The Angels Brigade")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Theo

There's no stock with the symbol OOP (at least not in the US), but run a Google search on "oop" and see if it pulls up companies who use that acronym.


42 posted on 09/16/2004 9:29:43 AM PDT by GovernmentShrinker (Donate to the Swift Vets -- www.swiftvets.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: rit
Many believe it is now toast.

That's news to me... I'm a graduate CS student. It would also be news to my professors. Are you just saying it's not the be-all and end-all? Aspect-oriented programming may be up and coming but it can't do much without OOP.

43 posted on 09/16/2004 9:34:18 AM PDT by JenB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: JenB
Are you just saying it's not the be-all and end-all?

No... I am pointing out that oop is an overloaded term. Programmers are limited by the "feature-set" of a particular implementation. When I am told a project will use oop, I always have to ask what language and what IDE in order to project the limitations (portability, architecture, communication flow, maintenance, enhancements, plug-ins, ..etc).

44 posted on 09/16/2004 10:04:38 AM PDT by rit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: rit

Oh, I see! I thought you were attacking the concept of OOP, which made no sense to me (admittedly I have been educated into a very pro-OOP bias).

To me, OOP is really more of a philosophy than anything else. The principle ideas - reuse code where possible, don't do two things in one piece of code, don't make program flow dependent on where the code is - can be applied, I think, even in a situation you're talking about.


45 posted on 09/16/2004 10:23:39 AM PDT by JenB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: JenB
To me, OOP is really more of a philosophy than anything else. The principle ideas - reuse code where possible, don't do two things in one piece of code, don't make program flow dependent on where the code is - can be applied, I think, even in a situation you're talking about.

I totally agree. I see OOP principles not only in application development, but in "life" as well. Many things can be seen as "objects," after all....

46 posted on 09/16/2004 11:07:30 AM PDT by Theo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: JenB
To me, OOP is really more of a philosophy than anything else.

That I can agree with.

47 posted on 09/16/2004 11:26:51 AM PDT by rit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson