The Iraqi Shia mullah, al-Sadr, is not disobeying his faith. he is being fiathful to the example set by his fanatical role model, the Prophet Mohammed.
1 posted on
04/07/2004 10:52:24 AM PDT by
pinochet
To: pinochet
Any thoughtful person who knows history and religion would be anti-Islam. Along with Communism, Naziism, and the Black Death, Islam has been responsible for more death and destruction on the face of the planet than just about anything else since the last asteroid impact. Islam was started by predators. It has spread by predation. It has lived off the decaying corpses of the civilizations it has destroyed. It is a vast, ancient sea of corruption, oppression, fanaticism, and ignorance lapping up against the shores of the present, kept alive by the fortuitous accident of living above huge reserves of petroleum.
2 posted on
04/07/2004 10:54:02 AM PDT by
aruanan
To: All
3 posted on
04/07/2004 10:55:05 AM PDT by
Support Free Republic
(Freepers post from sun to sun, but a fundraiser bot's work is never done.)
To: pinochet
It is notable that many leaders in Muslim countries over the years, have always claimed descent from Prophet Mohammed.Hmmm, I must be of royal blood, cause Grandma said that Grandpa was "more hammered than I ever saw him before the night I conceived your daddy".
Thank you, thank you ... I'll be here all week...
4 posted on
04/07/2004 10:55:39 AM PDT by
Hodar
(With Rights, comes Responsibilities. Don't assume one, without assuming the other.)
To: pinochet
Mohammad and al-Sadr lunatics? Sorry, they're "legitimate voices." - J F'n Kerry
5 posted on
04/07/2004 10:56:44 AM PDT by
Mr. Mojo
To: pinochet
What a boon for socialists: to demonize Muslims to the Christians, and demonize Christians to the Moors.
Then the atheists can inherit the Earth.
7 posted on
04/07/2004 10:59:25 AM PDT by
mrsmith
("Oyez, oyez! All rise for the Honorable Chief Justice... Hillary Rodham Clinton ")
To: pinochet
It's funny you say "lunatic," when the root of the word is "luna," Latin for moon, since the symbol of Islam is the moon.
8 posted on
04/07/2004 11:01:26 AM PDT by
Pyro7480
(Sub tuum praesidium confugimus, sancta Dei Genitrix.... sed a periculis cunctis libera nos semper...)
To: pinochet
When discussing Mohammad, one should always point out that Mohammad was a slave master who owned hundreds of slaves. Why American Blacks turn to Islam is beyond me.
To: pinochet
Here's what I don't understand:
The liberals are always saying that radicals do not represent "true Islam." Why, then, are the liberal press continuing to call al-Sadr a "cleric?" He's clearly a radical and, if so, obviously not representative of true Islam. Therefore, he can't *really* be a "cleric."
Blatant hypocrisy, if you ask me.
15 posted on
04/07/2004 11:10:57 AM PDT by
bolobaby
To: pinochet
Yeah...Mohammed was a nut case. But these poor b@stards can't hate themselves for still living in the 7th century so they gotta go and hate everybody else. Snuff out Islam and save the world.
Red
To: pinochet
This seems to me unavoidable. Islam has a 1,500 year record of violence, aggression, and enslavement of its enemies.
These behavior patterns can be traced right back to the beginning. Muhammed was nothing like Jesus or any Jewish prophet. He carried a sword, he married multiple wives including a little girl, he took slaves, he broke his solemn oath. He did many things that not even a virtuous pagan could approve. And he did it in the name of Allah.
27 posted on
04/07/2004 11:49:50 AM PDT by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius)
To: pinochet
Your radical fundamentalism against Muslims is the same as Osama's and Al-Sadr's radical fundamentalism against non-Muslims.
One and the same .
To: pinochet
PROPHET OF DOOM BUMP!!
33 posted on
04/07/2004 11:58:02 AM PDT by
BayouCoyote
(The 1st victim of islam is the person who practices it.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson