Posted on 03/06/2004 8:17:26 AM PST by Joblie
MEL GIBSON says that his film, The Passion of the Christ, is a faithful representation of the biblical story of Jesus' trial and execution. He also says the movie isn't anti-Semitic. He cannot be right on both counts.
The New Testament is, among other things, an anti-Semitic tract. It is the source of the anti-Semitism which has characterised Christianity for two millennia.
If the film isn't anti-Semitic, it's out of line with the Gospel. In face of complaints from US Jewish leaders, Gibson removed from the film's sub-titles - although not from the Aramaic sound-track - the response of the Jews to Pilate's hand-washing disavowal of blame for sending Jesus to be crucified: "His blood be upon us and our children."
But why? The quote is there in Matthew 27:25. Its meaning is clear and has been fulfilled in unspeakable ways down the ages.
Luke 23:28-29 gives the same point a more vicious twist, depicting Jesus telling weeping women he encounters on the Way of the Cross: "Daughters of Jerusalem, weep not for me but for yourselves and your children. For behold, the days are coming when they will say, 'Blessed are the barren and the wombs that never bore, and the breasts that never gave suck!'"
Better for Jews that they'd never been born, then.
There's been no shortage of Christians ever since to ram this murderous message home to Jewish neighbours.
John's Gospel (8:44) has Jesus telling the Jews they are descended neither from God nor from Abraham but are children of the Devil.
The early Fathers of the Church took inspiration from the Bible as they preached hatred of the Jews.
In the works of Tertullian, Justin, John Chrysostom, etc., Jews are relentlessly libelled... the obscene Jew, the Satanic Jew, the murderer-of-God Jew, the whoremonger Jew, etc.
And so it continued. Pope after Pope, Council after Council, confirmed and codified the subhuman status of the Jews.
Every century is pock-marked by examples. (Council of Toledo, 694: Jews living in Spain declared slaves, possessions confiscated, all children removed from them at seven and prepared for marriage to Christians.)
Hitler didn't suck the idea of Jews wearing yellow badges out of his thumb. He took it from the Fourth Lateran Council of 1215.
The Nazi persecution can be seen as a practical expression of traditional Christian attitudes to Jews.
"From the beginning until the end of Hitler's rule, the bishops never tired of admonishing the faithful to accept his government," Guenter Lewy recalled in "The Catholic Church and Nazi Germany."
Individual Catholic clerics who opposed the Nazis' anti-Semitism were a tiny minority, totally unrepresentative.
Catholic apologists concede now that the Vatican and the German bishops should have given stronger, more courageous leadership.
But this is dodging the issue. One of the reasons they didn't is that, by and large, they agreed with the Nazis.
From its beginning, Protestantism was as bad. The editor of the Nazi hate-sheet "Der Sturmer," Julius Streich, cited Martin Luther, reasonably, in a plea of justification at Nuremberg.
In his disgusting treatise "On the Jews and their Lies" in 1543, Luther had called for the fire-bombing of synagogues, the demolition of Jewish homes, the silencing of rabbis, the banning of Jews from public places, the confiscation of Jewish property and the enslavement of "all strong young Jews and Jewesses."
Christian hymns provided the theme music for the Holocaust.
Even after the gates were flung open on the horrors of Auschwitz, Christian teachers, in Ireland as elsewhere, continued to instruct infants that the scattering of the Jews and the persecutions they endured were punishment for the killing of the Christ.
Argument over Gibson's blockbuster gore-fest diverts attention from what's important.
If the film fuels anti-Semitism, it's to be condemned, irrespective of its merits as a movie.
But let's not allow a satisfying controversy obscure the fact that the founding text of Christianity is bloodily sodden with hatred of Jews.
Today we see anti Christian hatred and violence all over the world including in the US led by the rabid secularists many of whom are Jews along with their so-called Christian allies. They are bound and determined to force Christians into hiding.
Then perhaps it would be best not to unnecessarily isolate onesself.
I am a Catholic Christian. I was educated in Catholic schools for 12 years which means Sunday school EVERY school day. I know my bible and I go to mass every Sunday. I don't know why just taking an article and pointing out everything in that is true but unflattering to Christians is having a bone to pick with Christ.
They won't, especially with that kind of attitude, and I won't. And by the way, what is this, "Protestant Christian religion" of which you speak? Lutheran? Anglican? Methodist? Baptist?
True.
"We might have been equally guilty if we had been there."
True. And let us NEVER EVER forget this point.
"but we were not--and today, the clear message from the Christian community to the Jews is one of love and support at every level."
True and well put.
What I stated: That might not be a bad thing, considering that the minute you came out of them [the catacombs] you started cutting each other's throats.
That's not an attack. It's a statement of irrefutable fact, calculated to show that Christians--especially the ones "attacking" every individual, no matter how sincere, who dislikes their precious Mel Gibson offering--ought to show a bit more humility.
The writer of the article does not need a bible exegete. Or the EVERYBODY DOES IT (all religions have bad people in them) defensive speil. He needs reasurrance that we are sorry for all the sins of the past and present comitted by Christians.
Yuck. Still most, (not all) of what he wrote was factually true. We gave him the ammunition by our past bad actions. It is the same way with the slavery issue. We would love to have these issued resolved and forgotten and not thrown n our faces. After all OUR generation did not do all those terrible things. Yet who among us can say that we would not have held slaves if we lived in that era?
These kinds of attacks I see as kind of a penance that we must still expiate. And how bad is that penance really? American Christians have a better life than any people in the world. I do get so sick of right wing Christians griping about how bad we have it and equating attacks on bad Christian behavoir as attacks on Jesus.
Well that is hyperbole of course but it is true. St Paul had to constantly admondish Christians toward unity. There were many sects and offshoots in competion with one another.
Yes some of the bad guys were Jews. So were *all* of the good guys. There wasn't a decent Gentile in the whole movie.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.