Posted on 09/18/2026 5:53:37 AM PDT by Red Badger
Do we have time for one more look at the insane women who made up the Lindsay Clancy jury, now that, according to The Boston Globe, the lone holdout juror is "getting the negative attention he deserves"? The other jurors claim that the holdout disregarded jury instructions, but the jury had one job: to determine Clancy's innocence or guilt. Not to make a feminist statement. Not to get a national conversation going. Just determine innocence or guilt, based on the facts. The facts are that Clancy murdered her three children, aged 5 years to 8 months, with an exercise band. The lone holdout says eight jurors were pressuring him from the first day of deliberations to find Clancy not guilty by reason of insanity.
Maybe Paula Devlin and her pals on the jury should have been paying attention to the trial and not thinking about how they could get people talking.
In fact, at some point during the trial, they were planning to do a joint press conference on the topic of postpartum depression.
They already said that they wanted to use the verdict to create change to “make it better for other women.” Make what better for other women? Killing your children?
(Excerpt) Read more at twitchy.com ...
|
Click here: to donate by Credit Card Or here: to donate by PayPal Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794 Thank you very much and God bless you. |
I'll take the over on 15.
“When NBC does do an investigation of the other jurors...”
I’ll take “When pigs fly.” for $50.............
“When NBC does do an investigation of the other jurors...”
I’ll take “When pigs fly.” for $50.............
Jury duty as political activism.
It fits with our vanity, ‘everyone is a star’ society where everyone wants to make a bigger statement and express themselves to the world, we even see the mentality on the freeways, people see themselves as stars in their own personal live movie.
I guess the libs will defend this guy too. Clearly another case of pospartum depression:
Furrow-browed boyfriend ‘strangled girlfriend and set her house on fire while newborn baby was inside’
Daily Mail UK ^ | 10 26 2025 | ELIOT FORCE
Posted on 10/27/2025, 10:42:16 AM by yesthatjallen
A woman and her four-day-old newborn have died after her boyfriend allegedly strangled her and set fire to their home in New York while the child was still inside.
Kidane Haile, 30, was indicted and arraigned for second-degree murder on October 23 in Erie County after allegedly killing his girlfriend, 29-year-old Kathleen Carrig, and his infant son, Noah, according to the district attorney’s office.
District Attorney Mike Keane said Haile ‘is accused of intentionally killing his girlfriend prior to the fire,’ and added that his office anticipates filing additional charges after further investigation.
‘My thoughts remain with the family of these victims as we continue to seek answers and justice,’ he said.
The fire and alleged killings took place on October 18. The Buffalo Fire Department was called to an apartment on the city’s Norwood Avenue around 8.35am after receiving a report of a fire.
Inside the apartment, firefighters discovered Carrig and her newborn, who were pronounced dead at the scene.
Haile was taken to a local hospital to be treated for smoke inhalation. He was discharged on October 22 and taken into police custody because investigators of the fire had quickly deemed it a ‘suspicious incident.’
The Erie County Medical Examiner’s Office also determined Carrig’s death was a homicide caused by asphyxia due to strangulation.
Massholes doing what they do best.
The judge would have shut that down. It would have created clear grounds for a mistrial.
One solution for me to kill two problems. Settle Iran war and the problem with MASSachutes lefties, cede the state to the a holes in Iran.
Each?
These women (and I would call them crazy but in actuality they are not actually crazy, they are cold, calculating, selfish, grandstanders who can be summed up in one word:evil) did not follow instructions on what is expected of a juror—too look at the all the facts and decide-—they radicalized the jobs as jurors for a cause. Someone should look into the backgrounds and bank accounts.
If women are not responsible for their actions, why are they allowed to vote or even sit in a jury????
The whole purpose of this trial was to set a precedent for hormone-justified murder. If they had succeeded more tranny mass shootings would have been commissioned. Then, they would have pushed for gun bans.
This was an ideal case, and they lost the point.
That would present a problem for liberals.
On the one hand they say that hormones caused this.
Then on the same hand they say tranny murderers aren’t killing people because of hormone injections...........
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.