Click here: to donate by Credit Card
Or here: to donate by PayPal
Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794
Thank you very much and God bless you.
Posted on 08/16/2026 11:14:46 AM PDT by Red Badger
Democrat Rep. Eugene Vindman walked into a meeting with local party activists expecting to talk about the midterms. He walked out after members of his own side confronted him, tempers exploded and the exchange turned profane.
The August 11 meeting in King George County, Virginia, was supposed to help rally Democrats behind Vindman’s reelection campaign. Instead, transgender constituents pressed him over a vote he cast with House Republicans earlier this year.
The first report on the confrontation is below:
The Advocate reported that at least two transgender women and one transgender man challenged Vindman during the meeting. Several said they had waited for a direct chance to question him in a county where he had held no public town hall since taking office.
Their anger centered on H.R. 2616, the PROTECT Kids Act, which the House passed in May.
The meeting began with Vindman discussing affordability, President Trump and the November election before he invited questions. The first challenge immediately pulled the room back to his House vote.
Vindman told the room that he still considered himself an ally of LGBTQ Americans. But when asked why he supported the bill, he said he voted as a father and defended it as a matter of parental rights.
That answer did not satisfy the people confronting him. One military veteran described being thrown out of her home after a trusted adult at school disclosed her transgender identity to her parents.
Another attendee argued that a teacher or counselor may be the only supportive adult available to a child in that situation.
Vindman acknowledged that his vote would leave some people unprotected. He said he intended to support what he believed would benefit the majority.
As the meeting ran long, his campaign manager signaled for him to wrap up.
The argument followed Vindman into the hallway. During one exchange, a woman warned that refusing to listen to constituents could leave Democrats with another Republican representing the district.
Vindman answered that there was a “huge difference” and pointed to his own background as Jewish and an immigrant. The back-and-forth only grew more bitter:
The legislation behind the uproar is narrower than some of the rhetoric surrounding it. The official bill text applies to public elementary and middle schools that receive money under the Elementary and Secondary Education Act.
Those schools would have to obtain parental consent before changing a covered student’s gender marker, pronouns or preferred name on any school form. The same requirement would apply before changing sex-based accommodations, including bathrooms or locker rooms.
The bill defines a covered student as a minor in elementary school or the middle grades. It does not contain a separate procedure for a student who fears rejection, punishment or abuse at home.
Supporters frame that requirement as basic parental involvement. Critics argue that it could force schools to expose children to parents who may be hostile or abusive.
The Office of the Clerk of the U.S. House recorded the final vote at 5:21 p.m. Eastern on May 20. The bill passed 217-198, with 15 members not voting and no member voting present on the House floor.
All 208 Republicans who cast a vote supported it. Eight Democrats crossed party lines to vote yes, while 198 Democrats voted no.
Vindman’s official entry is recorded as “Aye.” His vote made the later confrontation a fight over a decision he had personally made, not a general argument about President Trump or Republican messaging.
The official tally also shows that the measure would have fallen short without the eight Democratic votes that joined the Republican majority.
The Senate has taken no action on the bill. Nearly three months later, Vindman’s vote was still an open wound inside his own coalition.
The final exchange became the ugliest moment of the night. A Democratic committee member told Vindman he needed to “shut up and listen.” Vindman said he had stayed even though the group was attacking him.
The committee member then used an expletive. Vindman moved toward him and fired back, “You can’t f***ing talk to me that way.”
The closing moments were captured on video:
Vindman walked out and refused a request for one more question. The next morning, his campaign contacted The Advocate and supplied a statement apologizing for his conduct.
He acknowledged that he had spent too much time talking and not enough time listening. He also said he had failed to meet his own standards and promised to listen to people who were hurting.
Vindman began the evening talking about President Trump, affordability and winning back control of Congress. He ended it trying to contain a revolt from voters Democrats normally expect to be safely inside their coalition.
The apology may cool the temperature. The confrontation itself is harder to erase.
When a friendly room turns that hostile, the political problem is bigger than one bad exchange.
What are your thoughts?
This is a Guest Post from our friends over at WLTReport. View the original article here.
|
|
Click here: to donate by Credit Card Or here: to donate by PayPal Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794 Thank you very much and God bless you. |
Cat fight!
Oh my. Sucks when your tent is so big that you must accommodate in it a small but vocal and potentially violent cadre of mentally ill people, pissed off Becuase you favored the reasonable interests of non mentally ill parents over them
He should’ve tried walking into a bar.
The left demands purity.
Two takeaways:
This is what you get with a rep who follows his personal biases instead of honestly representing his constituents; it’s a violation of his trust.
Storming out saying “you can’t effin’ talk to me like that” shows that reps like him consider themselves demigods instead of servants to their voters. Sure you can talk to him like that; if not, show the law prohibiting it.
The argument followed Vindman into the hallway. During one exchange, a woman warned that refusing to listen to constituents could leave Democrats with another Republican representing the district.
“two transgender women and one transgender man”
LOL...just THREE mentally ill people got the D’s in a tizzy and uproar! That’s what happens when your “Big Tent” is filled with nothing but weirdos, freaks, and the perpetually aggrieved.
“…he said he voted as a father and defended it as a matter of parental rights.“
Ooops, some might call that a bit bigoted…
That answer did not satisfy the people confronting him. One military veteran described being thrown out of her home after a trusted adult at school disclosed her transgender identity to her parents.
......
This adult was upset that it was asked to leave home because it’s parents did not want to live with it once they discovered it was pretending to be a different sex.
Another attendee argued that a teacher or counselor may be the only supportive adult available to a child in that situation.
........
Exactly. Parents need to know to be able to protect their children from those predators.
Getting the JK Rowling treatment.
Liberal/leftist on 95% of issues but show common sense on ONE thing and the knives come out.
Now if he gets re-elected he will cuck on this and bend over backwards to appease the freaks.
The first things the commies did was kill the first commies. To hell with all of them.
“He should’ve tried walking into a bar.”
Eugene Vindman walks into a bar.
The bartender asks: “Why the fat stupid face?”
I take great pleasure in seeing this happen to the traitorous Vindman.
> The left demands purity. <
Yep. And to make it even more interesting, their required beliefs constantly change. So what is perfectly acceptable today might get you purged tomorrow.
Kinda like what happened during the French Revolution.
Too bad he didn’t walk into an oncoming train.
It becomes more and more clear to me that the Democrat Party is damaging itself.
On the one hand, it is increasingly communist/socialist. That has always been principally an economic position. Workers of the world unite! Workers must control the means of production. Eat the rich. The Bourgeoisie are class enemies.
On the other hand, the Democrat voter base seems consumed with social issues — transgenders, men in women’s sports, hatred of Trump, open borders, green energy, etc.
Everybody on their side is moving Left in a crazy way but they really are not going in the same direction.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.