Skip to comments.
Tom Smith bear researcher .44 Magnum
Self
| February 16,2026
| Marktwain
Posted on 02/16/2026 4:18:16 PM PST by marktwain
Does anyone have a recollection of Tom Smith, the bear researcher, telling of a time when he and another were doing bear research and the companion shot a handgun but missed all the shots at the bear?
I have a vague recollection, but cannot find a source.
I thought it was in an interview by Tom Smith, maybe in a hunting or outdoor publication.
If anyone remembers such a thing, please reply.
TOPICS: Outdoors; Pets/Animals; Politics; Science
KEYWORDS: banglist; bear; handgun; smith
Help with my research is appreciated.
1
posted on
02/16/2026 4:18:16 PM PST
by
marktwain
To: marktwain
Mine is accurate to 100yds but probably not when being chased by a bear.
2
posted on
02/16/2026 4:30:40 PM PST
by
Zathras
To: marktwain
Doing a quick read of some of Dr Tom Smith's articles, he is not a advocate of shooting bears that want to kill you.
And…”be cautious in Brown Bear country”…what ever that means in regard to personal safety.
3
posted on
02/16/2026 4:45:34 PM PST
by
Deaf Smith
(When a Texan takes his chances, chances will be taken that's for sure.)
To: marktwain
Link A documented anecdote that fits this description involves a 2024 bear attack in Wisconsin, where a man attempting to defend himself against a charging black bear missed with every shot in his magazine.
The Incident:
- Location/Date: Wisconsin, September 2024.
- The Story: A man and his 12-year-old son were tracking a wounded bear with a dog. Without warning, the bear charged them from a short distance in thick cover.
- The Action: The man fired his handgun eight times, missing the bear completely due to extreme stress and the speed of the charge.
- The Outcome: The bear mauled the father. The 12-year-old son, however, was able to shoot the bear with a rifle, saving his father.
Context on "Emptying the Gun":
While this specific instance involved complete misses, other accounts highlight that even when shots are fired, handguns can be ineffective under extreme stress if the shooter does not hit critical areas. For example, in another case, a hunter in the Wyoming wilderness was unable to fire his Glock 10mm because it was not chambered, leading to a fatal encounter. Another incident involved a hiker who emptied a .38 revolver, hitting the bear multiple times, yet the bear still killed them.
These stories are frequently cited by experts to emphasize that in a bear encounter, adrenaline often leads to poor accuracy, and bear spray is often more effective than handguns.
4
posted on
02/16/2026 4:48:52 PM PST
by
E. Pluribus Unum
(Democracy dies with Democrats.)
To: marktwain
5
posted on
02/16/2026 4:54:34 PM PST
by
Responsibility2nd
(Import the third world. Become the second world.)
To: marktwain
6
posted on
02/16/2026 5:16:10 PM PST
by
Uncle Miltie
(Suspending my monthly donations until it becomes clear FR is run by and for conservatives.)
To: Uncle Miltie
I searched Grizzly, so may have missed the black bear reference above.
7
posted on
02/16/2026 5:17:12 PM PST
by
Uncle Miltie
(Suspending my monthly donations until it becomes clear FR is run by and for conservatives.)
To: Uncle Miltie
I tried Grok, with the same result.
8
posted on
02/16/2026 5:17:41 PM PST
by
marktwain
(----------------------)
To: Uncle Miltie
Black bear, per Grok:
“ No, even if the bear in question were a black bear (Ursus americanus) instead of a grizzly/brown bear, the specific anecdote you describe—someone (accompanied by, reported by, or witnessed by Dr. Tom Smith) emptying all six shots from a .44 Magnum revolver and missing every single one—does not appear in Tom Smith’s research, publications, interviews, or any associated accounts.”
9
posted on
02/16/2026 5:18:39 PM PST
by
Uncle Miltie
(Suspending my monthly donations until it becomes clear FR is run by and for conservatives.)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
10
posted on
02/16/2026 5:21:22 PM PST
by
marktwain
(----------------------)
To: Deaf Smith
“And…”be cautious in Brown Bear country”…what ever that means in regard to personal safety.”
Loosely translated, I think it means “Don’t get kilt” . . .
11
posted on
02/16/2026 5:36:47 PM PST
by
MCSETots
To: E. Pluribus Unum
These stories are frequently cited by experts to emphasize that in a bear encounter, adrenaline often leads to poor accuracy, and bear spray is often more effective than handguns. When it comes to defense against a bear I'll put my trust in something that doesn't have "B S" for initials.
With the exception of a Big Shotgun.
12
posted on
02/16/2026 6:00:28 PM PST
by
MikelTackNailer
(That some people find the 2nd Amendment in their way is proof of it's necessity.)
To: marktwain
AI says he beat the bear off with his heavy pistol.
13
posted on
02/16/2026 6:14:54 PM PST
by
TexasGator
(1.1~I11:/)
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson