Posted on 05/06/2025 10:29:38 AM PDT by John Semmens
In his research into the Wisconsin Election Commission's (WEC) voter registration database, Andrew Paquette found that the frequency of voter ID numbers ending in zero was 30.6%. The frequency for every other numeral being the last digit of an ID was 7.7%. If the numbers were issued either sequentially or randomly each numeral would have a 10% chance of showing up as the last numeral in each ID in the database.
Looking deeper into this anomaly, Paquette found that every voter ID record ending in zero had two different Wisconsin voters assigned the same voter ID number. This is evidence that the WEC's voter registration database is tainted by fraud that can manufacture phantom votes in the quantities needed to alter the outcome away from who the voters actually wanted and to the advantage of the candidate they actually rejected. This WEC database was used in the 2024 general election and in the recent 2025 election for a seat on the Wisconsin State Supreme Court.
The Help America Vote Act (HAVA, 2002), requires that each voter have a unique voter ID number and that no coded information not readily perceptible to election workers may be embedded secretly in the state voter roll database. There is no administrative necessity to justify the fact that, as it now stands, every record in the WEC voter database with a voter numbering ending in zero violates the unique ID number requirement.
President Trump has demanded a further investigation of the WEC voter registration database. However, American legal scholar Laurence Tribe said "while the anomaly an interesting puzzle, I don't think Trump or any one person has the legal standing to challenge the elections that may have been improperly affected by this anomaly. To have standing a person must show that he has been substantially harmed. No single voter can be said to have been substantially harmed as his or her vote would not have decided the outcome. Since he isn't a Wisconsin resident Trump obviously has no standing. The only body that could have standing is the entire collection of voters who voted in the contested election. Since those voters were divided in who they favored I can't imagine them all agreeing to file a lawsuit challenging the outcome."
Another legal “expert” declares that no one has standing to challenge election fraud. Everyone should have standing to challenge election fraud because until it is investigated, no one really knows if it affected the outcome of the election. All of this becomes a problem with masses of absentee mail-in ballots. People need to demand a change, but it requires an informed citizenry to identify the problem.
So if a 30% chance of voter #'s ending in 0 cannot be reconciled with the Chance Hypothesis, we go on to the next filter: Is there a "law" that would drive 30% of the voter #'s to be ending in 0? Just judging from the article it doesn't sound like it, though investigation of the details of how such numbers are generated should be done to achieve a robust conclusion. If not a product of the "system" (law), the 30% result can be reliably concluded to be the result of Design. In this case presumably the design of corrupt actors undermining the electoral system. (Hat tip to The Design Inference by Dr. William Dembski.)
Is there a link to this research?
No better proof that the 2020 election was a fraud than the strange 8million votes for Biden who didn’t appear in 2024 to vote for Harris.
The standing doctrine was made up by the courts to being with. It didn’t even exist until near the 1900’s I believe. Some court just made it up and then it went from there. It is actually unconstitutional because the constitution simply gives us the right to have our grievances heard.
Agree....2020 numbers simply don’t jive.
Here are some sources:
If the algorithm isn’t simple like “counts[candidate] += 1;”, then something was amiss.
Wouldn’t a losing candidate have standing to sue?
NOT A “CHANCE HYPOTHESIS”
PURE MATH
I did bank RECONCILIATIONS at a well known company for years.
2 payroll accounts with 1500 WEEKLY payroll checks each.
Accounts payable account with between 1500-1800 checks monthly.
Those 3 accounts == over 14,000 checks a month to sort. Could do all 3 accounts in under 3 weeks.
Had 11 other small accounts to reconcile PLUS other chores.
Had to HAND SORT the checks to do the reconciliation process.
NEVER FOUND EXTRA CHECKS WITH LAST DIGIT ==ZERO
NEVER
THIS IS OUTRIGHT FRAUD.
They will say those 8 million Biden voters were older white males who won’t vote for a black or a woman.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.