Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 03/28/2025 5:29:50 PM PDT by Red Badger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Red Badger

President Trump V2.0: No more Mr. Nice Guy.


2 posted on 03/28/2025 5:32:05 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (Democrats are the Party of anger, hate and violence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

The 51st state, right on Mr. Prez!


4 posted on 03/28/2025 5:32:47 PM PDT by Jyotishi (Seeking the truth, a fact at a time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

We can have discussions with Denmark and with Greenland.

But, should discussions not prove productive, I will go ahead and get this out there ahead of time:

I will not support an invasion of Greenland. The whole idea is bizarre, crazy, and morally wrong.


6 posted on 03/28/2025 5:36:14 PM PDT by Engraved-on-His-hands
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

How about a treaty with Denmark allowing us greater access? I would be happy to vote for ratification.


7 posted on 03/28/2025 5:37:13 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (FBI out of Florida!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

“the US would carry out more investment in more icebreakers”

The current ice-breaking fleet is woefully short of ships.


8 posted on 03/28/2025 5:37:13 PM PDT by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

Honestly, this is the strangest thing I think I’ve ever seen in the news. It reminds me as if I live in the time we bought the Louisiana Purchase.

I feel like I need one of those hats ol’ Ben Frankliln wore when he went to France.


9 posted on 03/28/2025 5:38:26 PM PDT by Beowulf9 ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger
President Trump Doubles Down: “We MUST HAVE Greenland, It’s Not a Question of Can We Do Without It, We Can’t”

I buy all this, but if Denmark refuses to relinquish it, what's our next step?
16 posted on 03/28/2025 5:48:31 PM PDT by AnotherUnixGeek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

Can’t bribe ‘em with some beer or something?


17 posted on 03/28/2025 5:48:43 PM PDT by Libloather (Why do climate change hoax deniers live in mansions on the beach?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

Please get us, US, taken care of first. Greenland people do not want us.


18 posted on 03/28/2025 5:51:01 PM PDT by SkyDancer ( ~ Am Yisrael Chai ~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

I don’t understand this at all...but I have been reading some scary stuff about polar shifts..maybe Greenland is projected to survive.


21 posted on 03/28/2025 5:53:55 PM PDT by cherry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger
Odd. If China is such a threat that we need Greenland, stop empowering them with trade and allowing them to get a free pass on covid, steal tech, steal ip and other crimes.

Stop kissing Xi's ass. Musk and the rest of the tech bros have a huge footprint in communist china, perhaps ending trade with them is the proper order instead of seizing another part of a country.

23 posted on 03/28/2025 5:59:15 PM PDT by Theoria
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

Good strategy. We will end up having total control of the waters around Greenland. Hopefully.


24 posted on 03/28/2025 6:00:00 PM PDT by toddausauras (Trump 2.0 is a much needed miracle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

MANIFEST DESTINY


27 posted on 03/28/2025 6:27:37 PM PDT by cowboyusa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

It’s not ours and I didn’t vote for this.

Expect bad things.


36 posted on 03/28/2025 9:32:50 PM PDT by Trumpisourlastchance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

We don’t need Greenland.

The whole idea is so idiotic that it can only be psy-ops for foreign media consumption.


39 posted on 03/28/2025 11:23:08 PM PDT by SpaceBar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

I agree in principle with everything President Trump says. What I genuinely don’t get is the approach.

USA could’ve pitched this as, the American base isn’t big enough to protect Greenland from Russia / China, but the USA could invest massively in Greenland to the mutual benefit of Greenland, Denmark AND the USA.

Could’ve pitched it as, “everyone’s a winner.”

Instead we have this bullshit where, from the Greenlanders perspective, Trump is proposing they become just another first nation reservation on their own land after ceding it to the USA in return for bugger all... while the new Yank owners get rich.

And from the Danes’ perspective, there’s literally no incentive to say yes.

Trump might be the best hardball negotiator in the world at real estate deals, where competition is fierce and winning needs a battle... but playing hardball in a bloodless negotiation with people who’d be perfectly happy to do a deal if they thought they were getting something better than a pig in a poke seems a bit counterproductive, to put it very mildly.

It’s like - imagine your vacuum cleaner is on its way out, you’re thinking of getting a Kirby, and a Kirby sales dude turns up at an inconvenient time. If he simply offered to do the demo another time and gave you his card, he’d probably have a guaranteed sale.

If the guy pushes his way into your house, uses pressure selling tactics , insults your wife because you refuse to be rushed, kicks your dog, and then threatens to keep coming back until you sign, it’ll get your back up.

Unforced error by the Trump administration. Europe doesn’t see hard sell as a virtue; they think pressure selling is the last resort of a crap salesman.


43 posted on 03/29/2025 1:42:21 AM PDT by MalPearce ("You see, but you do not observe" - Holmes to Watson, A Scandal in Bohemia)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

I don’t think Greenland is needed for anything beyond what we already have there. This and the Canadian crap are the only two things I think Trump needs to abandon.


44 posted on 03/29/2025 6:25:52 AM PDT by GingisK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

Greenland take over by (pick your preference)

1. USA. USA take over by direct purchase; making it a protectorate/commonwealth or; using brute force as last resort.

2. Russia. Russia take over by brute force.

3. China. China take over by trickery, cash loans, bribes, using brute force as last resort.

4. Remain Danish. Number 4’s chance of retaining it is like an ice cube on a sunny summer day.


46 posted on 03/29/2025 9:31:57 AM PDT by PIF (They came for me and mine ... now its your turn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson