Posted on 09/26/2024 5:53:35 AM PDT by Red Badger
WORLD WAR III UPDATE: The globalist left moved the world closer to nuclear war on Wednesday.
Russian President Vladimir Putin met with officials on Wednesday and announced changes to Russia’s nuclear doctrine.
Putin lowered the threshold regarding Russian strategic forces’ use of nukes.
In a televised address to Russia’s Security Council, Putin said nuclear doctrine has been effectively revised in light of recent developments.
Putin warned NATO in his message to top Russian leaders after meetings on Wednesday.
Vladimir Putin: “The updated version of the document proposes that aggression against Russia by any non-nuclear weapons state but with the participation or support of a nuclear weapon state should be regarded as a joint attack on the Russian federation.
The conditions for Russia’s transition to the use of nuclear weapons are also clearly defined. We will consider such a possibility as soon as we receive reliable information about a massive launch of aerospace attack NEDS and their crossing of our state border. Meaning strategic or tactical aircraft, cruise missiles, drones, hypersonic missiles and other aircraft…
…We reserve the right to use nuclear weapons in the event of aggression against Russia and Belarus as a member of the union state. All of these agreements have been agreed upon with the Belarussian side and with the president of Belarus.
The Gateway Pundit reported last week that Vladimir Putin warned that the NATO approval would change the essence of the conflict. Putin also warned that Kiev would be destroyed.
Vladimir Putin: The key is that only NATO servicemen can enter flight assignments into these missile systems. Ukrainian servicemen cannot do this.
And so this is not about allowing the Ukrainian regime to strike Russia with these weapons or not. It’s about deciding whether NATO countries are directly involved in the military conflict or not.
If this decision is made it will mean nothing other than the direct participation of NATO countries, the United States, European countries, in the war in Ukraine. This is their direct participation and this already significantly changes the very essence and the very nature of the conflict…
This would mean that NATO countries, the United States are at war with Russia.
GloboHomoPedoNazis and Zeepers do have an interest in kids, just like the UN-NATO Blue Helmets in Serbia.
simply not true!
Germany promised no expansion of East Germany. Know your facts.
NATO was and is always about expansion.
“Should or will?............”
I have no idea how to assess the odds of “will”, FRiend.
so WW3 is totally justified to defend Zelensky because he is a friend of the USA (my cuntry rite or rong), and Russia has no right to defend their national interests because they are so evil so why capitulate, just keep on racketeering and playing nuclear chess games,... rite or rong (/sarcasm)
You realize that there is a segment of Freepers who do not support Putin’s aggression in Ukraine (and elsewhere) that have been called GloboHomoPedoNazis and Zeepers just because thats their opinion.
Now you make a blanket accusation that they must also be pedos. Please stop this childish and insulting name calling and nasty behavior. You trash the forum with it.
The shoe fits, wear it.
Just because Zelensky is a Degenerate Homo doesn’t mean he can’t be a world class Thief, Pirate, Money Laundering Assassin and Murderer.
A ‘dead horse’ with nuclear weapons.
Read those last two words again.
Let it sink in.
Now, do you REALLY want to piss them off or ignore them?
I want to see us take ALL our weapons back from the Ukes, let Russia know we’ve done this, tell NATO “you’re on your own!”, and then get the Hell out of there. Let’s focus on OUR problems (like the possibility a f**king COMMIE may get elected as President).
With the current occupant of the WH, there is no ‘will’.........
Additionally, you lament the decline of the Forum, which has occurred SINCE the appearance of Zeepers, and not in the twenty years I've been here before Zeepers.
Regardless of what happens, Russia has stated their position.
We do not threaten them with nukes. Plus the last time the US acquired territory by force was the Spanish American War.
Bunkers won’t mean sh*t in a devastated country with millions dead and maimed along with a broken infrastructure. There are no winners in a nuclear war.
What I find frightening is the lack of understanding and fear of what a nuclear confrontation means in terms of destruction. Our so-called leaders are leading us off a cliff. Insanity.
Funny, isn’t it? One would think from the rhetoric that Ukraine IS a member of NATO hence our obligation to risk our very existence in the defense of the sovereignty of Ukraine.
Follow the money. Who profits from the continuation of this ten year proxy war? Certainly not the average Ukrainian. Our compromised President made millions from Ukraine using his bagman son. The US military-industrial complex is making lots of money. The Ukrainian oligarchs are being showered with billions of dollars without any US oversight. Black Rock is buying Ukrainian assets.
Trump was impeached over Ukraine. One of his possible assassins had substantial connections to Ukraine.
I have been here as long as you. Actually longer by sign up date. And I lurked before that.
You dont hear from others because many of us just want to avoid the waste of time arguing with folks who cant get through a post without a disparaging insult, which any name calling is. Debate like an adult.
You call me a Zeeper, yet like a lib, you are just assigning a label. Define how I am a Zeeper? You would find that you are wrong. Matter of fact, you would likely find on most issues we agree. Ukraine/Russia is only a small part of whats wrong with our country and the world under Dem rule.
I’ll go farther, I trust Trump to resolve our involvement in the Ukraine/Russia conflict, even if its not what I think should be done. How about you? What if Trumps solution is not what you think it should be? He has said he will solve it, but has in no way provided the ‘how’. Nor should he. I have some ideas and I think it wont be just cutting off Ukraine.
Now, you want to call truce and be just a little more respectful of our common service to country, or you want to continue to name call?
December 17, 2021. Putin puts forward a draft “Treaty between the United States of America and the Russian Federation on Security Guarantees,” based on non-enlargement of NATO and limitations on the deployment of intermediate-range and shorter-range missiles.
January 26, 2022. The U.S. formally replies to Russia that the US and NATO will not negotiate with Russia over issues of NATO enlargement, slamming the door on a negotiated path to avoid an expansion of the war in Ukraine. The U.S. invokes NATO policy that “Any decision to invite a country to join the Alliance is taken by the North Atlantic Council on the basis of consensus among all Allies. No third country has a say in such deliberations.” In short, the US asserts that NATO enlargement to Ukraine is none of Russia’s business.
February 21, 2022. At a meeting of the Russian Security Council, Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov details the U.S. refusal to negotiate:
“We received their response in late January. The assessment of this response shows that our Western colleagues are not prepared to take up our major proposals, primarily those on NATO’s eastward non-expansion. This demand was rejected with reference to the bloc’s so-called open-door policy and the freedom of each state to choose its own way of ensuring security. Neither the United States, nor the North Atlantic Alliance proposed an alternative to this key provision.”
The United States is doing everything it can to avoid the principle of indivisibility of security that we consider of fundamental importance and to which we have made many references. Deriving from it the only element that suits them – the freedom to choose alliances – they completely ignore everything else, including the key condition that reads that nobody – either in choosing alliances or regardless of them – is allowed to enhance their security at the expense of the security of others.”
February 24, 2022. In an address to the nation, President Putin declares: “It is a fact that over the past 30 years we have been patiently trying to come to an agreement with the leading NATO countries regarding the principles of equal and indivisible security in Europe. In response to our proposals, we invariably faced either cynical deception and lies or attempts at pressure and blackmail, while the North Atlantic alliance continued to expand despite our protests and concerns. Its military machine is moving and, as I said, is approaching our very border.”
Hi Kabar.
I agree with you. Russia has no control over itself. Russians must attack. Attack. Attack. Attack. And, now that Russia has nuclear weapons, resistance means death.
Who attacked Poland in 1920? and Poland again in 1939? Hungary in 1956? Czechoslovakia in 1968? and Afghanistan in 1979?
Then the communist system collapsed. And, Russia needed some time to get back to attacking.
Then, 2008 Georgia. 2014 Ukraine. 2020 Ukraine again.
It’s clear, they’re addicted to aggression. So, if the little countries around Russia don’t surrender, they are responsible for Russia attacking. And, if Russia uses nuclear weapons, that too isn’t Russia’s fault. It’s the fault of not surrendering to Russia.
When I was a boy, the left-communists had a slogan, “better red or dead.” They knew that Russia would eventually be forced to start a nuclear war and kill everybody, so we should surrender to them.
Well, let’s just say Ronald Reagan had another idea.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.