Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Russia Announces Changes to Nuclear Doctrine: Western Missile Strikes Deep Inside Russia Will Trigger an Atomic Response (VIDEO)
Gateway Pundit ^ | September 26, 2024 | Staff

Posted on 09/26/2024 5:53:35 AM PDT by Red Badger

WORLD WAR III UPDATE: The globalist left moved the world closer to nuclear war on Wednesday.

Russian President Vladimir Putin met with officials on Wednesday and announced changes to Russia’s nuclear doctrine.

Putin lowered the threshold regarding Russian strategic forces’ use of nukes.

In a televised address to Russia’s Security Council, Putin said nuclear doctrine has been effectively revised in light of recent developments.

Putin warned NATO in his message to top Russian leaders after meetings on Wednesday.

Vladimir Putin: “The updated version of the document proposes that aggression against Russia by any non-nuclear weapons state but with the participation or support of a nuclear weapon state should be regarded as a joint attack on the Russian federation.

The conditions for Russia’s transition to the use of nuclear weapons are also clearly defined. We will consider such a possibility as soon as we receive reliable information about a massive launch of aerospace attack NEDS and their crossing of our state border. Meaning strategic or tactical aircraft, cruise missiles, drones, hypersonic missiles and other aircraft…

…We reserve the right to use nuclear weapons in the event of aggression against Russia and Belarus as a member of the union state. All of these agreements have been agreed upon with the Belarussian side and with the president of Belarus.

The Gateway Pundit reported last week that Vladimir Putin warned that the NATO approval would change the essence of the conflict. Putin also warned that Kiev would be destroyed.

Vladimir Putin: The key is that only NATO servicemen can enter flight assignments into these missile systems. Ukrainian servicemen cannot do this.

And so this is not about allowing the Ukrainian regime to strike Russia with these weapons or not. It’s about deciding whether NATO countries are directly involved in the military conflict or not.

If this decision is made it will mean nothing other than the direct participation of NATO countries, the United States, European countries, in the war in Ukraine. This is their direct participation and this already significantly changes the very essence and the very nature of the conflict…

This would mean that NATO countries, the United States are at war with Russia.


TOPICS: Front Page News; Government; Politics/Elections; Russia; Ukraine; War
KEYWORDS: delusionalzeepers; escalation; fearporn; foreigntrolls; foreigntrollsonfr; killkillkillforpeace; mic; putinsfolly; russia; slaviccivilwar; slavictrolls; tothelastukrainian; ukraine; warisgoodforbusiness; warwarwar4putin; welfarewar; yawnalready; zeeperfolly; zeepers
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 201-212 next last

1 posted on 09/26/2024 5:53:35 AM PDT by Red Badger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Horse manure.


2 posted on 09/26/2024 5:55:24 AM PDT by pierrem15 ("Massacrez-les, car le seigneur connait les siens" )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Sucks to have Leftists who INSIST on seeing if Russia is bluffing. I do know one thing, however, when faced with the same type of threat to Western Europe during the Cold War, we sure as hell weren’t bluffing.


3 posted on 09/26/2024 5:57:22 AM PDT by BobL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

When a major power draws a Red Line, it’s a good idea to pay attention to the Red Line.

Unless, of course, it’s the US that’s drawing the Red Line. We aren’t serious about our Red Lines. But other countries just might be.


4 posted on 09/26/2024 5:58:40 AM PDT by ClearCase_guy (My decisions about people are based almost entirely on skin color. I learned this from Democrats.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pierrem15

Why the anger? Isn’t this what Zeepers have worked for?


5 posted on 09/26/2024 6:01:37 AM PDT by JonPreston ( ✌ ☮️ )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: pierrem15

F*ck around, find out. Putin drew a red line on NATO membership for Ukraine. We ignored it.

Do we really want to find out if Putin is bluffing? Nuclear war over the sovereignty of Ukraine? Biden, Blinken, Sullivan, Powers, et. al. Do we really have confidence in this group of knaves and fools who got us into this mess in 2014?


6 posted on 09/26/2024 6:01:51 AM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

“When a major power draws a Red Line, it’s a good idea to pay attention to the Red Line.”

Oh, don’t be silly. We have people who INSIST they can read Putin’s mind right here on FR, and they say it’s a bluff. And if they’re wrong, FR won’t be around for us to gloat - so it’s a no-lose deal for them.


7 posted on 09/26/2024 6:02:32 AM PDT by BobL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: BobL

Your point is taken. I do think it is a bluff, but I am less sure of it.
In any event, is Ukraine worth losing the bluff calculation over? No.
There are circumstances that would be worth the risk though, threats to national sovereignty, etc.
If the cartels in Mexico banded with the Russians or Chicoms in a mutual defense treaty and started arming up with missiles from either Russia or China? etc.


8 posted on 09/26/2024 6:08:04 AM PDT by desertsolitaire ( Lee Harvey Oswald and the Bands final performance)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: BobL
Sucks to have Leftists who INSIST on seeing if Russia is bluffing. I do know one thing, however, when faced with the same type of threat to Western Europe during the Cold War, we sure as hell weren’t bluffing.

Yeah, it's almost funny, watching otherwise intelligent people claim that Putin is a deranged/desperate/dying/demented dictator, and 30 seconds later insist there is ZERO chance he will EVER use nuclear weapons. Not a slight chance; not even a teeny tiny infinitesimally small chance; but zero chance.

9 posted on 09/26/2024 6:09:27 AM PDT by Who is John Galt? ("...mit Pulver und Blei, Die Gedanken sind frei!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
The key is that only NATO servicemen can enter flight assignments into these missile systems. Ukrainian servicemen cannot do this.

The Ukrainians will be given gift cards that allow them to do this.

10 posted on 09/26/2024 6:10:04 AM PDT by fruser1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BobL

Best to discard the Western MSM. Start reading Russian news sources, the people are questioning Vlad’s restraint- MANY Russians are calling for nuking Kiev, get the war over with no matter the costs.

Wait till the world sees Vlad’s replacements, ALL advocate strikes on Ukraine and the western handlers.


11 posted on 09/26/2024 6:10:33 AM PDT by delta7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: desertsolitaire

People. Listen and ask: Is a ‘western’ missile strike on Russia the same as a Ukraine missile strike on Russia using western weapons? Do drones count as missiles? It’s been goin’ on.


12 posted on 09/26/2024 6:10:39 AM PDT by DIRTYSECRET
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: BobL

It’s not that people think it’s a bluff per se. But the Russians say this crap literally every week for the past 2 1/2 years. The “Red line” you speak of appears to be transparent and it wiggles like a worm.

And most people who remotely follow Russian bluster understand that 99% of it is for internal consumption. It is easier to send your sons to die if you feel that they are defending the motherland.

Ukraine is not an existential threat to Russia. No other country (other than China) appears to have any desire to engage or invade Russia. The world knows that.


13 posted on 09/26/2024 6:11:01 AM PDT by Vermont Lt (Don’t vote for anyone over 70 years old. Get rid of the geriatric politicians.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: kabar
Consider: US military assets were used to fly Zelensky to a muntions plant in Pennsylvania, where he proceeded to electioneer on behalf of Kamala Harris.

A regime that does that could care less whether or not Putin is bluffing. And casual talk about surviving a nuclear exchange by the same shows that those of the regime are not serious people.

14 posted on 09/26/2024 6:11:05 AM PDT by Tench_Coxe (The woke were surprised by the reaction to the Bud Light fiasco. May there be many more surprises)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: pierrem15
" Horse manure"


15 posted on 09/26/2024 6:12:09 AM PDT by Right Brigade (It was better before they voted for whats his name,this must be the New World)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: kabar
Do we really want to find out if Putin is bluffing? Nuclear war over the sovereignty of Ukraine? Biden, Blinken, Sullivan, Powers, et. al. Do we really have confidence in this group of knaves and fools who got us into this mess in 2014?

No, no, and no.

16 posted on 09/26/2024 6:12:56 AM PDT by johniegrad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Vermont Lt

“It’s not that people think it’s a bluff per se. But the Russians say this crap literally every week for the past 2 1/2 years.”

No, actually, just about every red line has been made by the Neocons. Starting with “We’ll only send Ukraine defensive weapons”, not to mention the limits on where those weapons were to be used.

This, on the other hand, is RUSSIAN red-line, and it was clearly stated by Putin.

But like I said before, if you guys are wrong, no big deal - no one will be criticizing you.


17 posted on 09/26/2024 6:14:41 AM PDT by BobL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: pierrem15

The man has 6000 nukes so you must be some sort of prophet of the future that can see that this won’t happen - but r you want it to happen.


18 posted on 09/26/2024 6:15:38 AM PDT by wildcard_redneck (He who sacrifices freedom for security deserves neither.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

“When a major power draws a Red Line, it’s a good idea to pay attention to the Red Line.

Unless, of course, it’s the US that’s drawing the Red Line. We aren’t serious about our Red Lines. But other countries just might be.”

Totally understand Russia’s stance . The US and others are out to take them ( China next ? ) out ; an existential threat to Russia if I ever saw one .


19 posted on 09/26/2024 6:16:25 AM PDT by sushiman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Who is John Galt?

Neocons are grifting morons with a murder-suicide fetish.


20 posted on 09/26/2024 6:17:06 AM PDT by wildcard_redneck (He who sacrifices freedom for security deserves neither.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 201-212 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson