Posted on 06/30/2024 10:22:47 PM PDT by Enterprise
Mercifully, the Chevron doctrine was euthanized by the USSC. A lot has been prohibited by unelected petty bureaucrats. Ok, so what can we have again? Add to the list.
(Excerpt) Read more at freerepublic.com ...
Freon
Incandescent bulbs
1967 GTO?
Can we keep our natural gas stoves?
It is tempting to add to the list rules and regulations which should be vigorously challenged which have been mandated by agencies like the DOE, IRS, and the EPA, so that's ok. My main point is to regain what they prohibited.
From what I read from the decision is that it’s going forward that stops the three letter agencies.
But their past deeds shall be enforced.
I hope I’m wrong.
You are right. Unfortunately the rules and regulations still stand. My belief is that they can now be challenged. Let us hope!
That may a challenge and take a while. To me, once the made that ruling, anything put in place would be null and void. Sadly we know that ain’t gonna happen.
-PJ
Excellent! I forgot that one!
Draining puddles.
Leaded gas.
Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane (DDT)
If I know the left; they’ll just keep doing what they’re doing. Look at Biden 3 times bribing college kids to “forgive” their loans after he was smacked down the first time.
The left will force something that is obviously wrong, then years later when it’s smacked down just shrug their shoulders. Nothing ever happens to them. Ever.
bookmark
Well sort of, it's my understanding from the legal blogs I read that any regulation that had been challenged in court and upheld on "Chevron" grounds could not be rechallenged. However, if a Federal Agency tried to expand or reinterpret a law then that could conceivably open up the entire set of regulations based on the original interpretation for legal challenges.
For instance, say the EPA came down with a regulation saying you couldn't build withing 500 feet of a waterway, and based that regulation on their interpretation of the Clean Water Act. It was challenged five years ago and upheld on "Chevron" grounds. You couldn't take the EPA back to court to relitigate it. However, if the EPA was to expand the 500 feet ban to 1,000 feet or change the definition of what constitutes a waterway, then you could conceivably challenge the entire thing and even get the original 500-foot ban struck down.
That's why I'm guessing federal agencies are going to be VERY careful about reinterpreting laws or trying to expand regulations for fear of losing the regulations they already have in place.
That’s what I was reading as well. Does that mean new cases on those topics can’t be filed or just that old decisions are closed, requiring new action to reverse?
Thank you.
Any IRS help with the new charges?
The modern turbo flush toilets work well, but I “know of” an adapted American Standard head that incorporates a riser in the tank that just doesn’t cut it given the flow dynamics were spec’d for a full tank.
ping
Congress enforces the laws SO why in the hell doesn’t congress start overturning this GREEN BS!!
I’ve wondered about that too. If you make an honest mistake on your forms, it won’t be brought to your attention for a couple of years. By then you have accrued what I consider to be unfair penalties. The IRS doesn’t have to notify you in a timely manner of your mistake, they can simply pound you with heavy penalties.
Good post. Thank you!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.