Skip to comments.VIDEO: When Will Fani Willis Be Indicted for White House "Get Trump" Collusion?
Posted on 08/21/2023 8:23:29 AM PDT by PJ-Comix
Okay, Fani Willis probably won't be indicted for ELECTION INTERFERENCE but at the very least she should be investigated for COLLUDING with the White House and Jack Smith to weaponize her indictment against President Donald Trump. First place to start is to check Willis' phone data for Friday, August 11. Another place that promises to yield interesting results is to check the phone data of Valerie Jarrett for the same time period. Don't be surprised to find calls placed from Jarrett's phone to Atlanta that day.
Who is the first brave reporter out there to ask about and investigate this assertion by Newt Gingrich? Will his revelation ultimately lead to the dismissal of ALL the highly political ELECTION INTERFERENCE indictments against Trump?
Could be anybody. If you just call, no FOIA trail. But without a lot more on the front end… newt’s statement is way too indefinite, nothing will result
When you ask????
I predict Fat Fani will be indicted for collusion on February 31st.
Hating Americans and America IS what these two women do but my guess IS higher up called for. If jarret Made the Call she was directed to deliver a message by a higher up or several higher ups. Okay
“Unless someone out there has a better idea as to WHO the culprit was that called Fani Willis from D.C.. “
No one more qualified to put the squeeze on than Joe’s bagman, Hunter.
You can also say the same thing about Alvin Bragg, AG of NY James, both ran on a promise to “get Trump”, as did Willis. You can probably also tie in that “judge” in the J6 case, she’s another piece of evil work. Notice how the dems set all these up using blacks, that way any criticism of their “work” can be dismissed as “racist” and since all but Bragg are women, they can also call any criticism “sexist”.
“We must strip all funding and, if appropriate, impeach Fani Willis,” Colton Moore, vice chairman of Georgia Freedom Caucus, said in a statement.
“America is under attack,” Moore wrote on X. “I’m not going to sit back and watch as radical left prosecutors politically TARGET political opponents.”
A probe into Willis’s prosecution of Trump could lead
to her impeachment, Breitbart reported.
U.S. House of Representatives:
* Telephone: 202-225-3121
* Website: http://www.house.gov/
* Telephone: 202-224-3121
* Website: http://www.senate.gov/
Message: Republicans control the House
<><>you must issue Willis a Subpoena
<><>and have the Capitol Police serve her
<><>bring her in for a House Committee hearing
<><>then just REMAND HER INTO CUSTODY
<><>while searching her entire Background for a Crime
<><>meanwhile moving forward proceedings to impeach her.
Online form to contact Colton Moore.
I’ve always figured she was the conduit through which soetoro got his marching orders.
That said, the Rats care only about power, not truth.
FOIA means nothing to them as we see they all communicate by aliases, anyway.
I predict Fat Fani will be indicted for collusion on February 31st.
Feb 31st, in the year 2525.
Willis’ overkill WRT Trump is obvious-——she indicts him for carrying on political dialogue:
<><>making a phone call
<><>suggesting supporters watch a tv program
<><>making a campaign hotel reservation
Listen up Fani. In no way will Americans handover a
monopoly on election conversation to you and your kind.
This is really about inoculating Democrats regarding efforts
already underway to rig elections in 2022 and beyond. The precedent is set:
<><>identify and exploit Democrat-favored voting irregularities
<><>indemnify the risks
<><>label any objection as a Trump-variety ‘false claim’
<><>plague, persecute, and prosecute all naysayers as insurrectionists.
We’re fighting back.
"Anybody" wasn't going to be able to convince Fani Willis to force an indictment on Monday, Aug. 14. It had to have been someone she personally knew and was powerful enough to force Willis to make a fool of herself. Some "anybody" clerk in D.C. can't do it. Imagine this phone call:
"Um... Hi Ms Willis. I'm an assistant clerk in Jack Smith's office and I was wondering if you could issue the indictments on Monday. Awwww... Please! Pretty please. The worst that can happen is you reveal yourself to be a partisan hack which everybody already knows you are."
Nope. It had to have been someone HIIIIIGH up.
A review of Fani Willis’ indictment against Trump reveals the woman actually
reads at third grade level w/ a zero IQ. Her ludicrous, politically motivated charges include:
<><>criminalizing free speech,
<><>listing numerous mundane “acts” she “says” further a “conspiracy” to overturn the 2020 election.
<><>criminalizing text asking for phone nos “to chat with state leaders”
<><>conversations on election results are a “furtherance” of alleged crimes.
<><>Trump’s tweets constitute a “furtherance” of alleged crimes
<><>Trump conspiring when he asked voters to watch televised GA Legislature hearings.
In 2017, a woman sued conservative actor, James Woods, for misidentifying her as a Nazi in an allegedly libelous tweet. The tweet included a photo not of her but of a different woman giving a Nazi salute while wearing a Donald Trump t-shirt at a campaign event.
The court ruled in favor of Woods under the “innocent construction rule.”
She appealed, but the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit upheld the ruling.
The “innocent construction rule” requires courts to consider a written or oral statement in context, giving the words, and their implications, their natural and obvious meaning.
If a statement may reasonably be interpreted innocently, it cannot be actionable per se. [Republic Tobacco Co. v. N. Atl. Trading Co., 381 F.3d 717, 726-727 (7th Cir. Ill. 2004)]
I wasn’t suggesting it want someone high up, just that anyone who just telephoned would not create a FOIA trail
circle back for video
The National Constitutional Law Union says it is improper to prosecute Mr. Trump under these indictments, given that Bruen and Dobbs mandate that all constitutional provisions be applied in accordance with their fixed meaning in 1787-1789.
Todd J. Aldinger says the Supreme Court’s recent Dobbs and Bruen decisions allow for Trump and his lawyers to argue that all actions a president takes while in office must be considered legal unless the chief executive is successfully impeached and removed. Trump was impeached and acquitted twice.
I always was under the impression that demonrats used melanated female (D)s to do their dirty work because they have built in immunity from any criticism or consequences as any resistance can simply be countered and shut down by screeching racism
Fani (ASS) Willis reminds me of Marilyn Mosby (Baltimore)..
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.