Posted on 02/22/2023 9:08:58 PM PST by MinorityRepublican
There are multiple, lying chickenhawk warmongers above who are deflecting from the central problem - neocons/neolibs - because they support Obama, Biden, etc, and no doubt will be triggered over this.
Trump says Obama was behind 2014 Maidan Uprising in Ukraine, leading to the US ‘teetering on the brink of World War 3’
YEP. And we knew about Burisma before the Xiden selection. Someone had a small video online.
YEP. And we knew about Burisma before the Xiden selection. Someone had a small video online.
And... the same trashy neocons/neolibs above also push this war, just not as much as Nuland:
Elon Musk: Nobody ‘Pushing’ Ukraine Conflict More Than (War Vampire) Victoria Nuland
There is not an ounce of evidence, there is eleventy gajillion ounces. Look into George Soros purchase of Ukraine, and if he ain't Deep State, nobody is.
You're just an old Deep State stooge yer damn self, Williams,, and nobody buys your sefense of your masters. Give it up, already.
And arrangements with other powerful American politicians' sons...Pelosi, Romney, Schumer, and a host of others. And that's just the ones we know about. Do you seriously believe those billions of dollars are not getting 'repurposed' back to these politicians, amongst other people?
Are you really that naive? Grow up, child.
IBTZ
From The Saker Blog
https://thesaker.is/the-dire-significance-of-putins-feb-21-speech/
The Dire Significance of Putin’s Feb 21 Speech
16014 ViewsFebruary 22, 2023 10 Comments
by David Sant for the Saker blog
On Tuesday, February 21st President Putin gave a speech that was expected to be very significant. After it was delivered, however, most pundits said he didn’t say anything we didn’t already know. Most of them focused on his announcement of the withdrawal from the START II treaty. However, he said something far more significant.
An Existential Threat
What Mr. Putin said, when read through the lens of international law, should be chilling to the West.
We would do well to remember that Mr. Putin majored in international law. His speech made a legal case against NATO.
First he listed, by my count, 30 different ways in which the Western nations have attacked Russia. These included the expansion of NATO to Russia’s borders, support of terrorists in Russia, economic war, terrorist sabotage of the Nordstream Pipeline, financing of the coup and war in Ukraine, directly assisting Ukraine to attack targets in Russia including Russia’s nuclear bombers, and plotting to destroy and partition Russia into pieces.
Nestled in the middle of these was an important statement.
“This means they plan to finish us once and for all. In other words, they plan to grow a local conflict into a global confrontation. This is how we understand it and we will respond accordingly, because this represents an existential threat to our country.”
Putin’s choice of words is extremely significant in light of Russian nuclear doctrine, which states that nuclear weapons could be used by Russia “in response to the use of nuclear and other types of weapons of mass destruction against it or its allies, and also in case of aggression against Russia with the use of conventional weapons when the very existence of the state is threatened.”
Among the 30 points of evidence of the American war on Russia, Mr. Putin listed several cases of American use of conventional weapons against Russian territory through Ukraine as the thinly veiled proxy, and stated that this represents an “existential threat to [the Russian State].”
What Mr. Putin has just told us is that the Kremlin now considers nuclear use condition #2 to be true, today.
This statement was accompanied by two related actions. The day before the speech Russia tested a Sarmat II ICBM. And at the end of the speech, Mr. Putin announced that Russia shall immediately withdraw from the START II treaty, which limits the number and range of their nuclear missiles.
These three statements and events together should tell the collective West that Russia has just said “Get off my porch!”, and cocked the forty-five.
This doesn’t mean that Russia is going to strike the USA tomorrow morning. But, we are definitely now teetering on the cliff’s edge of nuclear war.
(Excerpt, read the rest at the link)
Whatever you think on either side about the Ukraine, it’s not worth a nuclear war.
...btw. wasn’t it the US who persuaded the Ukraine to give up their nukes after the Soviet Union broke up?
Kazan “But, the quicker Russia ends this war, the better off those of us that believe in an American First agenda will be.”
Yes, Russia should return to its 2013 borders now and end the war
Yes, Russia should return to its 2013 borders now and end the war
If you believed in 'America First', you would have an American flag on your homepage. You got a Polish flag. Somehow I don't think you're an America First kinda guy.
In other words, leave American problems to Americans. If we want any sheiss outta you, we'll squeeze your Polish heads.
LOL.
Down with combat fatigue and up with nuclear war!
Destroy that evil Putin and all of his evil, Russian horde!
Even if it puts everyone in a state of MAD!
Yes, it is. I was done with Ukraine before the stupid war even started.
Yawn.....
And because it is a both a resource drain and feint/distraction from China.
Increasingly I think the WEF/Schwab/Harari classic villain game has become so very public as a jr partner feint from China (with additional jr partner in Russia) as well.
George Soros - World Economic Forum Annual Meeting Davos 2010
https://creativedestructionmedia.com/investigations/2022/05/03/george-soros-the-god-emperor-of-ukraine/
ARTICLE ORIGINALLY POSTED ON NOVEMBER 15, 2019
With the ‘impeachment’ inquiry underway in the U.S. House of Representatives, any reasonable person will see the lineup of U.S. government officials arrayed against POTUS for disagreeing with them on American foreign policy. Impeachment is not just about removing President Trump from office, or to prevent his re-election, it is about securing future control over American operations in foreign countries by the progressive Deep State that was established under the Obama Administration.
These people have become drunk on power and on lot’s of your money; they don’t want this gravy train to stop.
Soros and his NGOs have essentially taken over the operations of the U.S. government in Ukraine. Open Society or Aspen Institute people have been placed strategically in positions of power throughout the Department of State, CIA, FBI, USAID, and other American governmental instruments. Soros NGOs like the Open Society Institute, the Aspen Institute, and the International Renaissance Foundation train a pipeline of cadre that when experienced enough are placed in the appropriate positions of power.
This also happens on the Ukrainian side. Soros-influenced personnel are located throughout the Ukrainian government, and penetrate every ministry in the country. These strategic tactics were honed by the Soros infrastructure in the Balkans and also in Central Europe.
‘NO AD’ subscription for CDM! Sign up here and support real investigative journalism and help save the republic!
These well-placed Soros agents make sure any decisions regarding commercial banks, sale of land, decentralization, minority benefits, etc, are all decided in favor of the progressive agenda. This process leads to the loss of sovereignty and the economic plunder of Ukraine. Much of the billions in aid given by the U.S. government and the International Monetary Fund are in turn given to Soros NGOs in-country in order to further the Soros plan. These developments have led to looting, laundering of money, breakdown of government institutions, bankruptcies and the fire-sale of government-owned institutions in Ukraine.
Sources within Ukraine inform CD Media that the Soros agenda includes getting control of Naftogas assets in-country, control of the central bank, control of land by forcing the sale of agricultural land to foreign companies, and control of the political system in Ukraine.
Intelligence sources tell CD Media that the following people and institutions are or were in the Soros cabal in Ukraine:
State Department, USAID, FBI, etc - George Kent, Marie Yovanovitch, Karen Greenway, Martha Boersh, Geoffrey Pyatt, Michael McFaul, William Taylor
World Bank: Sato Kahkomen
Ukrainian Officials: former President Petro Poroshenko, former Prime Minister Arseniy Yatsenyuk, Volodymyr Groisman, former Finance Minister Natalia Jaresco (US citizen), former Finance Minister Alexandr Danilyuk, Finance Minister Oksana Markarova, Yuriy Vitrenko (Naftogas and Ukroboronprom), Andrei Kobolev (Naftogas), Aivaras Abromacius (Minister of Economic Development and Ukrobornoprom), Alexei Gonocharuk (current prime minister), Timofiy Milovanov (Minister of Economic Development), Inna Sovsun, Yuriy Blashuk, Petr Chernyshov (Kyivstar), Vladislav Rsahkovan (IMF, NBU).
Oligarchs: Viktor Pinchuk allegedly owes more than $1 billion to George Soros funds or banks. Pinchuk controls people within the Ukrainian government and lobbies for legislation that supports the progressive agenda.
Investment Banking: Dragon Capital, Tomas Fiala
Strategic Consulting: George Massoud at McKinsy Kyiv, Lazard Managing Partner Boijdar Djelic (former Finance Minister in Yugoslavia)
Political Parties: Golos (Vyacheslav Vakarchuk, Julia Klimenko). Golos is co-sponsored by Dragon Capital and the Soros machine.
Bag lady, the flag you post on your profile gives your location.
You have both state and country flags.
If you posted one it would be the Russian flag, right?
Here's another piece of Americana you won't get, cause you're one of them Pole people.
#StifleYourself
Its very much an option. Particularly as we feel the economic harm from our involvement in this war and the economic sanctions which have hurt the West a lot more than they’ve hurt Russia.
Kudos on a succinct and accurate analysis. That a supposedly backwater nation in East Europe could have attracted the princelings of Biden, Pelosi, Kerry, Romney, and many more whose names are less well known, to gather up tens of thousands of dollars a month to "consult" in areas these political princes were not expert tells the tale. This is why the propagandists want the narrative to be something else. Should that unravel with receipts as more public proofs, many "fine families" would be shaken. So instead it is assured they are being shaken down. Protect us, or else. Epstein-like. Clinton-like. Obama-like.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.