Posted on 12/16/2022 1:32:35 PM PST by Timber Rattler
I don’t really care. But this is all so strange that I sort of think there is something going on behind the scenes. I have no idea what that might be.
Seems like they’re trying to assert that being depicted as wearing someone’s clothes violates a copyright on the design of those clothes. Pretty far out there.
The MAJOR ANNOUNCEMENT was just so plain stupid that there’s no need to try to make it seem worse.
I think this is funny, in a fully intended way.
There’s no “there,” there, with this. It’s just another way to fund raise, like the Trump straws or the Trump wooden train, people have bought.
Rumor is that the bulk were purchased by someone that owed Trump a favor. This is just a neat secret way to launder some nefarity.
Looks like the Libs and GOPe are mad they didn’t come up with the idea first. But who would buy virtual Biden “Traitor Cards” or Jeb Bush guacamole bowls for $99?
Doesn’t matter they are all sold. They’ll be a good investment.
Show us on the Trump doll where he hurt you.
Weird, just book hotel rooms. No need to do the hunter painting op.
It’s like getting a leg lamp with a torn fishnet!
Oh my, a rumor you say. Is that what you accept as truth, or are you yet another Deep State stooge spreading false rumors?
In 2015 or so do you remember Trump wine and Trump steaks? I think there was a line of ties and polo shirts too. It’s all good to me.
Kyle Barr writes like a spurned lover.
>> A photo of clothes is copyrighted. <<
“Appear to use” = there’s no unique identifier to prove the case. They’re basically just saying, “Hey! Those look like the same clothes in the same position that this store photographed! I bet it’s the same photo!”
Adding a background doesn’t make the photos fair use, since this is an NFT, not a non-profit commentary. (Sadly, Free Republic was the test case for proving that if you derive ANY income, it’s not fair use.) But the LACK of any context for the clothes in the original imagery means there’s either electronic identification or there’s not. And if the “journalists” suspect there is, but don’t know, then they need to shut up until they find out.
Trump wine and Trump steaks weren’t part of his presidential campaign, and he didn’t tease them as a “MAJOR ANNOUNCEMENT!” They were simply a small part of how Trump got very wealthy.
I’m not suggesting any in particular. Could be a number of things I suppose.
Previous comment rescinded. You can tell without electronic verification.
Trump said it best...We need a SUPERHERO.
Trust the pkan
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.