Posted on 11/18/2022 5:34:11 PM PST by george76
Nancy Pelosi rightfully will go down as one of the greatest speakers in the history of the U.S. House of Representatives. I’m not sure I would agree with Pelosi on a single policy issue; that’s not the point. As far as leadership ability and political smarts, Pelosi ran circles around the bumbling Republicans of her time.
Pelosi got things done for the Left in a way no recent Republican leader could for the Right. When the stakes were highest, she was able to corral her votes. Simultaneously, when the far Left went too far, she was willing to slap them down.
There’s a name for all this. It’s called leadership. Republicans are desperate for a leader like this in the House.
Before the 2006 elections, as the George W. Bush administration began cratering politically, the far Left began pushing to impeach him over the Iraq War. Pelosi led the charge against impeachment. She took on the far Left directly. They hated her for it.
But Pelosi knew that Democrats were winning politically and was smart enough to see that impeachment had the potential to shake that up. It worked. As a result, Democrats gained 30 seats in the House and took back control of the chamber for the first time in 12 years. This effectively ended the Bush administration’s power and paved the way for Barack Obama.
In the process, Pelosi was elected as the first female House speaker in history. She didn’t get it due to some 2022-style artificial diversity push. She earned it.
If Pelosi’s first big political test was holding off the far Left, her second test required walking moderate Democrats right off a cliff in the name of historic left-wing progress. In 2010, Democrats lost their filibuster-proof majority by losing a special Senate election in Massachusetts, of all places.
Even Obama saw this surprise Massachusetts defeat as the end for Obamacare. He was ready to cave and replace the massive federal health care takeover with a series of smaller bills. Pelosi wouldn’t have it. With the push for Obamacare, unlike the impeachment debate earlier, Pelosi found a cause she deemed more important than politics. Moderate Democrats knew their votes would cost them their seats, but Pelosi was able to get them to vote for Obamacare anyway.
In the end, Obamacare passed, and because of it, 63 Democrats predictably lost their House seats in the 2010 midterms. Pelosi lost the speakership. Through this process, she did something no recent Republican leader has come close to doing: She proved she was willing to lose political power to get things done. Democrats viewed Obamacare as the holy grail. To them, implementing it was worth the cost.
Conservatives should ask themselves: Is there a single issue recent Republican leaders feel that passionately about? What’s the point of winning elections if you aren’t going to do big things?
You don’t have to like Nancy Pelosi or Obamacare to admire this level of leadership and smarts. It’s precisely what has been lacking among congressional Republicans.
On the Right, the reformist side is so desperate for progress that they sometimes end up tilting at windmills, often at their political peril. Even worse, the larger establishment bloc is not really interested in getting things done.
To them, the election itself is the endgame. Washington service is largely a tryout for a career in corporate influence. They are happy to make some attempt at stopping the most left-wing policies, but real progress on a conservative agenda is not even something they contemplate. They don’t say it out loud, but the unwritten rule is anything at all that threatens reelection is off the table.
This is, of course, a perversion of the political process, but it’s 100% the mindset of the majority of Republicans in Washington.
Republicans love to hate Pelosi, and often for good reason. She was tough and even mean sometimes. On issues like COVID-19 and stock trading by members of Congress, she helped break trust with the American people. More broadly, she pushed through many policies that will hurt America badly.
This record is nothing to celebrate. But as a purely political matter, Pelosi has been by far the greatest congressional leader of our time. She ran her caucus with tight control. Nobody really crossed her, and she got things done.
The gap is so huge that the House Republicans she’s gone up against were never really in her league. Pelosi was both tougher and smarter than them. She usually ran circles around them. The honest truth is that conservatives are dying for a House leader of Nancy Pelosi’s caliber.
I don’t think she was great one bit.
I admire nothing about orwellian, babykilling, man hating socialists.
Someone as successful as she was and will take no prisoners.
An unprincipled slime bag with a pathological hatred of all things American?
I’m dying for a speaker like Joe Cannon, who served during the administrations of Roosevelt 26 and Taft and wielded even more power than Nancy Pelosi did. Another great GOP speaker was Nicholas Longworth, who ruled the House while Coolidge and Hoover were in the White House.
Paul Pelosi has a Grindr profile.
EXACTLY!!!! Wouldn’t you love a House speaker in the GOP who approaches politics like a bloodsport rather than play patty cakes- which is what the GOPe has done for 20+ years now?????
As far as leadership ability and political smarts, Pelosi ran circles around the bumbling Republicans of her time.
Patel ain’t lying on that. Put her politics aside, she played hardball and got sh*t done.
Yes. 10000%.
But she runs the House and got what she wanted.
She’s been knee-capping republicans for decades while they play patty cake.
Agreed. Her competition was do nothing Dennis Hastert who was a compromised child molester, and Paul Ryan who is nothing more than an assistant Democrat.
And we had the likes of Boehner and Ryan.🤣🤮
I don’t want a waitress like Nasty Pelousi. I want her to get cancer.
We’re dying for a vituperative, childish (tearing up the SOTU speech in 2020, for example), insider-trading, vodka soaked, forked-tongued harridan for Speaker of the House?
Nope. We’re not.
Do we have any mafia guys in the house?
Good synopsis. :)
She had no self restraint.
In DC, she fit right in.
I cannot stand Nancy, but I’ll be the first to admit, bottom line, she was effective in getting most of her agenda done.
Uh-huh. Sure, Neil.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.