Posted on 07/21/2022 5:41:29 PM PDT by george76
The problem is that they’re in common use..
New York Congressman Jerry Nadler openly admitted at a House Judiciary Committee hearing this week that the point of gun control legislation being pushed by Democrats is to confiscate firearms in “common use”.
When questioned by GOP North Carolina Rep. Dan Bishop if Democrats dispute that the “Assault Weapons Ban of 2021,” proposes to ban guns currently in “common use” nation-wide, Nadler, chairman of the committee, replied “That’s the point of the bill.”
“So, to clarify, Mr. Chairman, you’re saying it is the point of the bill to ban weapons that are in common use in the United States today,” Bishop again asked.
“Yes,” Nadler responded, adding “The problem is that they’re in common use.”
Bishop went on to tell the Democrats that “What you suggest that this order can possibly comply with what the Supreme Court has held (as regards the Second Amendment) in now three separate cases is absolutely absurd.”
Bishop also declared that “the Democrats of the 1960s are the Democrats of the 2020s.”
...
The legislation, H.R. 1808, would ban “semi-automatic assault weapons” that contain a magazine, a pistol or forward grip and a “folding, telescoping, or detachable stock,” as well as weapons that can fire more than 10 rounds or contain a threaded barrel or second pistol grip.
TPTB an try to take my rifle but there will be a conflict.
Losing is probably pretty lucrative, if you do it right. What a country!
The Second Amendment does not forbid citizens to possess fighter jets.
“....as well as weapons that can fire more than 10 rounds...”
Well, that even covers my single-shot .22 rifle!
That’s about the most succinct way of putting everything I have seen in a while. We are witnessing the end of a civilization.
The gun grabbers are going to push people too hard.
If I have nothing to lose, why would I turn them in?
Don’t get hysterical. Write to your members of Congress and call them. It’s not that hard.
You need to finish that statement. "The Second Amendment does not forbid citizens to possess fighter jets. The United States government does.
Good luck with that Dems. It might not turn out quite the way you expect it to go.
My statement was complete. There’s not a word in the Second Amendment about fighter jets.
When they come for our guns we might as well turn them in bullets-first because they are going to kill us anyway.
We might even win.
In other words if this bill somehow passed and was signed into law, Biden’s signature wouldn’t even be dry before some federal Judge (likely a Trump appointee) put an injunction halting it on the basis it violates the recent Supreme Court Gun Ruling.
The 2nd amendment denies the government the authority to infringe upon our right to bear arms!
I myself had written on FR that it was leading up to, or a trial run sort of thing, not that it WAS the Mark. It's definitely coming from the same team.
5 MINUTE VIDEO EVERY AMERICAN NEEDS TO SEE AND SHARE!
REPUBLICAN CONGRESSMAN ASKS POLICE CHIEF IF HE WOULD ENFORCE GUN CONFISCATION
https://www.bitchute.com/video/ba8T332EsRPs/
Gerold Nadler can go shit his pants on stage again.
The problem, as always, is who is going to do the confiscating?
I have a census taken in New Hampshire just before the Revolutionary War.
It lists for each town how many able bodied men there are, how many guns, how many pounds of lead, how many pounds of gunpowder, and how many pounds more of each was requested and needed.
“I saw a video of Nadler yesterday smirking about how 2nd amendment adherents can’t explain why the 2nd amendment does not allow citizens to possess fighter jets, etc.”
But you can own a fighter jet. All you need is the money to purchase it, maintain it, and operate it. Not cheap, but people do own fighter jets.
Go to Trade-a-Plane.com and search for F4 Phantom.
EC
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.