Posted on 06/23/2022 11:03:58 AM PDT by Red Badger
The Supreme Court just ruled that the Constitution allows individuals the right to carry a gun outside the home. This decision struck down New York state’s law, which required a special permit to carry a concealed handgun in public.
New York Gov. Kathy Hochul is furious over the court’s decision.
“It is outrageous that at a moment of national reckoning on gun violence, the Supreme Court has recklessly struck down a New York law that limits those who can carry concealed weapons,” Hochul tweeted once the decision of the Supreme Court was released.
Hochul has been an outspoken supporter of gun control.
At the beginning of June, just after the mass shootings in Buffalo, New York and Uvalde, Texas, Hochul actually signed into law more gun restrictive laws, the New York Post reported.
“I speak to you today as the governor of a state in mourning and the citizen of a nation in crisis … It just keeps happening. Shots ring out. Flags come down, and nothing ever changes — except here in New York,” Hochul said before she signed into law 10 bills passed by state lawmakers in the aftermath of the mass shootings.
But now, the Supreme Court has ruled against one of New York’s most fundamental laws for carrying firearms.
(Excerpt) Read more at westernjournal.com ...
Bang, bang.. my baby shot me down.
Ohhhhhhhhh...
I’m melting.. I’m melting...
Woa oh oh, woaaaa oh...
Poor widdle witch...
Now watch them reinstitute stop and frisk for lawful citizens
She is off her meds, and she’s gone full kook.
<< “struck down a New York law that limits those who can carry concealed weapons,” >>
Yeah, the CCW permits were limited only to those with political connections, just like in all leftist authoritarian counties in “may issue” states.
People keep dying because they can’t shoot back, you ignorant b@&ch.
The Left ignores the document.
The document does not forget them.
This one is a clone of that glossy witch in MI.
Gun controllers legally wounded by their own zealotry.
What the heck is a “national reckoning”?
That vile -itch should give up her armed security all together.
Suck it, Nazi.
To the goofy governor if you don’t like the second amendment you can change it with another amendment, its a long process and will not get enough states to join in but until you get a SCOTUS that doesn’t follow the constitution your stuck with the ruling.
So what, exactly, is changing as a result of your increased attempts at gun control, Governor?
With that kind of response, she may soon learn the meaning of the term “apoplexy”.
at a moment of national reckoning on gun violence... I think they mean that even having a massive amount of gun restrictions and laws, people are realizing that criminals don't abide by the laws especially when lefty DA's don't prosecute criminals. As such, people reckon that more laws won't do any good.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.