Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Justice Clarence Thomas Asks the Supreme Court to Reevaluate Big Tech’s Immunity Under Section 230
GATEWAY PUNDIT ^ | 3/8/2022 | JIM HOFT

Posted on 03/08/2022 9:56:16 AM PST by bitt

Justice Clarence Thomas issued a statement on Monday about the denial of certiorari in the Jane Doe v. Facebook case. In his statement, Justice Thomas called for the Supreme Court to “address the proper scope of immunity under §230 in an appropriate case” available to Big Tech.

Justice Thomas narrated that it’s “hard to see” why section 230 is protecting the Big Tech from liability for companies’ “own ‘acts and omissions.’

“It is hard to see why the protection §230(c)(1) grants publishers against being held strictly liable for third parties’ content should protect Facebook from liability for its own “acts and omissions,” Justice Thomas stated.

“Here, the Texas Supreme Court afforded publisher immunity even though Facebook allegedly “knows its system facilitates human traffickers in identifying and cultivating victims,” but has nonetheless “failed to take any reasonable steps to mitigate the use of Facebook by human traffickers” because doing so would cost the company users—and the advertising revenue those users generate,” he said.

(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: 1stamendment; bidenlovershatehoft; bigtech; bloggers; clarencethomas; fakewaypundit; firstamendment; ginnithomas; hoftalert; january6th; justicethomas; scotus; technofascism; whoops
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

1 posted on 03/08/2022 9:56:16 AM PST by bitt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Whenifhow; null and void; aragorn; EnigmaticAnomaly; kalee; Kale; AZ .44 MAG; Baynative; bgill; ...

P


2 posted on 03/08/2022 9:56:31 AM PST by bitt ( <img src=' 'width=50%>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bitt

Oh how I wish I could waive my magic wand and make Justice Thomas Chief Justice Thomas.


3 posted on 03/08/2022 9:58:34 AM PST by Yo-Yo (Is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Yo-Yo

yep


4 posted on 03/08/2022 10:01:49 AM PST by ptsal (Vote R.E.D. >>>Remove Every Democrat ***)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: bitt
Clarence Thomas

Eight v one, the anti-Americans are winning.

5 posted on 03/08/2022 10:02:12 AM PST by JonPreston (Q: Never have so many, been so wrong, so often)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bitt

About time.

You’re either a publisher or a platform.

Criminal Tech wants it both ways.


6 posted on 03/08/2022 10:03:06 AM PST by E. Pluribus Unum ("Communism is not love. Communism is a hammer which we use to crush the enemy." ― Mao Zedong [FJB])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

I would say they want it neither way - they don’t the liabilities of being a Publisher OR a Platform. They don’t want any liabilities at all.


7 posted on 03/08/2022 10:06:01 AM PST by Little Ray (Civilization runs on a narrow margin. What sustains it is not magic, but hard work. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
About time. You’re either a publisher or a platform. Criminal Tech wants it both ways.

Bingo. Their own actions of de-platforming different-opinion posters and removing comments make them a content publisher, not a content carrier, and removes their Section 230 immunity.

8 posted on 03/08/2022 10:06:36 AM PST by T.B. Yoits
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: bitt

Make them all utilities, after all they are tools.


9 posted on 03/08/2022 10:10:57 AM PST by duckman ( Not tired of winning!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bitt

One of the best and smartest supreme court justices in the history of America.


10 posted on 03/08/2022 10:11:11 AM PST by Son-Joshua (son-joshua)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Yo-Yo

Rather wave it and make 6 of those @ssholes disappear!


11 posted on 03/08/2022 10:11:30 AM PST by The MAGA-Deplorian ( 2022 - VOTE THE BUMS OUT —— ALL OF THEM! RE-ELECT NO ONE!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: bitt

Clarence Thomas is the best jurist on the court, bar none. Trump’s picks have been a big disappointment. Then there’s this anti-constitution pick of Bidet’s.


12 posted on 03/08/2022 10:13:26 AM PST by beethovenfan (Mene, Mene, Tekel, Upharsin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Yo-Yo

I see your magic wand and I raise it so that we clone justice Thomas to hold 4 1/2 seats and bring back Scalia for the other 4 1/2 seats


13 posted on 03/08/2022 10:13:39 AM PST by swingdoc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: swingdoc

I see your magic wand and I raise it so that we clone justice Thomas to hold 4 1/2 seats and bring back Scalia for the other 4 1/2 seats

~~~

LOL!

Cloning and resurrection. These are either dark arts or miracles.


14 posted on 03/08/2022 10:19:31 AM PST by z3n (Kakistocracy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: bitt

I am of the opinion that the correct forum is the Congress, not the courts.


15 posted on 03/08/2022 10:19:47 AM PST by taxcontrol (The choice is clear - either live as a slave on your knees or die as a free citizen on your feet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bitt

I LOVE CLARENCE THOMAS!!!


16 posted on 03/08/2022 10:21:09 AM PST by Sir Bangaz Cracka (Poor 'lil Travon bees slamming dat white cracka'a head into dat sidewalk causin he be scared)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bitt

““It is hard to see why the protection §230(c)(1) grants publishers against being held strictly liable for third parties’ content should protect Facebook from liability for its own “acts and omissions,” Justice Thomas stated. “

Finally.

Eliminate sec 230.


17 posted on 03/08/2022 10:25:07 AM PST by Mariner (War criminal #18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bitt

Would this be a measure for the government to protect us from our own gullibility? Would this protection make us smarter or stupider?


18 posted on 03/08/2022 10:25:46 AM PST by cymbeline
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

I wonder if Thomas even talks to Roberts.


19 posted on 03/08/2022 10:25:48 AM PST by TakebackGOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Yo-Yo
Oh how I wish I could waive my magic wand and make Justice Thomas Chief Justice Thomas.

George W. Bush actually had that 'magic wand' in his hand - and failed to use it. That was literally the biggest mistake of his presidency...

20 posted on 03/08/2022 10:29:09 AM PST by Who is John Galt? ("...mit Pulver und Blei, Die Gedanken sind frei!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson