Posted on 02/20/2022 4:17:45 AM PST by blam
The conservative media also skewed what the filing said. For example, Mr. Durham’s filing never used the word “infiltrate.” And it never claimed that Mr. Joffe’s company was being paid by the Clinton campaign.
Most important, contrary to the reporting, the filing never said the White House data that came under scrutiny was from the Trump era. According to lawyers for David Dagon, a Georgia Institute of Technology data scientist who helped develop the Yota analysis, the data — so-called DNS logs, which are records of when computers or smartphones have prepared to communicate with servers over the internet — came from Barack Obama’s presidency.
“What Trump and some news outlets are saying is wrong,” said Jody Westby and Mark Rasch, both lawyers for Mr. Dagon. “The cybersecurity researchers were investigating malware in the White House, not spying on the Trump campaign, and to our knowledge all of the data they used was nonprivate DNS data from before Trump took office.”
In a statement, a spokesperson for Mr. Joffe said that “contrary to the allegations in this recent filing,” he was apolitical, did not work for any political party, and had lawful access under a contract to work with others to analyze DNS data — including from the White House — for the purpose of hunting for security breaches or threats.
After Russians hacked networks for the White House and Democrats in 2015 and 2016, it went on, the cybersecurity researchers were “deeply concerned” to find data suggesting Russian-made YotaPhones were in proximity to the Trump campaign and the White House, so “prepared a report of their findings, which was subsequently shared with the C.I.A.”
A spokesman for Mr. Durham declined to comment.
Mr. Durham was assigned by the attorney general at the time, William P. Barr, to scour the Russia investigation for wrongdoing in May 2019 as Mr. Trump escalated his claims that he was the victim of a “deep state” conspiracy. But after nearly three years, he has not developed any cases against high-level government officials.
Instead, Mr. Durham has developed two cases against people associated with outside efforts to understand Russia’s election interference that put forward unproven, and sometimes thin or subsequently disproved, suspicions about purported links to Mr. Trump or his campaign.
Original Source NYT
Can you say “whitewash”? I knew you could.
Can you say “whitewash”? I knew you could.
Thank you. Perfect attitude for today. I wretch at all the chicken-little hand wringers who don’t have an ounce of fight or a sliver of a backbone who have laid down at their ‘puter keyboards waiting to be assimilated deeper into the gubmint borg.
Arm-up, carry on!
This interview is more relevant today, and goes down in the weeds enough, to blow this entire narrative out of the water.
What an interview!
Bull Binney NSA Russian Expert | World Geopolitical Tech Director SIGINT / Kirk Wiebe - 32 years NSA)
Key to the Coup - Parallel Platforms
“Its a diversion away from the CIA, where all of this is going on.” - Bill Binney
Abuse took place through NSA, CIA, DOD
AND
Bob Mueller went after these guys back in 2001
Wide abuse of 702s
Highly important interview - relevant to.right now -
Download/copy this interview
Proof the whole thing Durham is working on was an inside job -
The lawyer from Perkins Coie was part of the Clinton campaign. Just because court filings don’t say spied doesn’t mean that what was described wasn’t spying. It was. People still carry water for Clinton
More disinformation. The media doesn’t report the story but it does report the supposed rebuttal of the story.
I am sorry, but I have been reading posts like this on FR since the Clinton Administration.....about Gore, then about Hillary, then about Obama....
I believe these people will never be held to account by anyone other than the Almighty Himself.
This is taken from the NYT, and it is fake news. It’s the narrative they are pushing, because it sounds plausible. Durham is not that incompetent, it was during the Trump years.
That last line “original source NYT”
So the entire article is a Big Fat Lie.
This $h1t doesn’t even belong on this forum!!
The New York Times is like oxygen for socialist stooges.
They were trusted to do computer work. And they were democrat spies. All the shuck and jive won’t change year.
I’m of the opinion this is to plan.
What stuck out to me
After Russians hacked networks for the White House and Democrats in 2015 and 2016, it went on, the cybersecurity researchers were “deeply concerned” to find data suggesting Russian-made YotaPhones
There's a lot of hype, but in fact, no one knows, or is publicly saying, WHO hacked DNC servers. The FBI never looked at the servers. They rec'd selected "copies" from Crowstrike, but that's all.
Its why this article is simply designed to confuse
So Durham and his attorneys and investigators can’t read a calendar and are prosecuting innocent people for acts committed under a contract with Obama’s WH to look for Russian hacks???
I thought Durham was alledging that the spying in Trump’s WH occurred because they had access because of the prior contract and were able to use that access—but reported they couldn’t find anything.????
“Song of the mockingbirds.” Excellent term.
This interview is more relevant today, and goes down in the weeds enough, to blow this entire narrative out of the water.
What an interview!
Bull Binney NSA Russian Expert | World Geopolitical Tech Director SIGINT / Kirk Wiebe - 32 years NSA)
Key to the Coup - Parallel Platforms
“Its a diversion away from the CIA, where all of this is going on.” - Bill Binney
Abuse took place through NSA, CIA, DOD
AND
Bob Mueller went after these guys back in 2001
Wide abuse of 702s
Highly important interview - relevant to.right now -
Download/copy this interview
Proof the whole thing Durham is working on was an inside job -
Thanks
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.