Posted on 01/22/2022 7:04:50 AM PST by Dr. Franklin
On Wednesday, the Wisconsin Assembly held another election integrity hearing to present evidence of voter fraud and irregularities that have been found in their investigation of the rigged 2020 election.
And just like last month’s election hearing, they dropped some serious bombshells.
Yesterday’s hearing built on those findings and presented more questions for the Wisconsin Elections Commission (WEC), which has failed to answer previous questions on the 2020 election.
They did however respond to the reported 119,283 active voters who have been registered for over 100 years, but their weak response just didn’t cut it.
Wisconsin Assembly Attorney Dean O’Donnell, who is an expert analyst on the election integrity team, called out the official explanation that was given, saying “it does not hold water,” before dropping some more of his team’s jaw-dropping findings of corruption in the 2020 election.
According to O’Donnell, they found an astronomical 569,277 registered voters had an application date of 1/1/1918, which accounts for roughly one out of every fourteen voters in the state’s database.
Oh, and wait, there’s more. One out of every five of those “phantom voters” apparently cast a ballot in 2020 – a whopping 115,252 of them to be exact.
Insane.
I wonder how many checked the box for Biden… I’d say it’s somewhere between 100% and 100%,
(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...
Is there documentation backing up this claim?
Again, nobody but us cares. Not even our Repugnant elected kongressKreeps.
Next!
RINOs are even more detestable than your garden variety RAT bastard.
Just updating voter roles would solve lots of problems
They REGISTERED in 1918, so that means they are all at least 123 years old. It must be the good Wisconsin water and clean outdoor living. I’m impressed they are spry enough to get to the polling places.
Biden got 100% of the WWI Veteran vote.
Verifiable proof, for use in a legal proceeding? Unlikely.
When legitimate Conservatives start running.
When folks start doing research and stop paying attention to the person with the most campaign money and the most commercials.
When they stop voting for their friend, who has repeatedly stabbed them in the back with a smile on their face, and cast a vote for someone that actually cares instead of using their positions to enrich themselves.
When folks start voting for the ‘devil they know’, even though that devil has screwed them over again and again, and give someone else a chance.
When people demand accountability and hold these folks accountable, up to and including recall mechanisms to force these elected clowns to do what the voters sent them there to do.
No matter how you slice it, it’s out own fault. We’re the ones electing them to these positions.
Well, Doctor Franklin, what have you given us?
I bet that if data isn't input for registration date, it defaults to 1/1/1918. Furthermore, I bet if you look at the addresses on these registrations, most of the buildings didn't even exist in 1918.
This is a database error, not fraud.
I am not saying that fraud was involved... but boy, that does seem like a highly unlikely situation. /RINO confronting DemonRats.
Did you even read the article at all?
The entire article is based on documentation. Its easy enough to ferret out those who registered to vote in 1918
Skip updating. That has never worked.
Just void the rolls every four years on December 31 after a presidential election and require every voter to re-register in person at the registrar’s office with appropriate ID and proof of residence. If the voter is not well and cannot leave his or her abode, then send a certified registration person to the dwelling.
Democrats yammer a lot about “Republicans destroying our democracy,” but these voter roll problems undermine our government to the core. Is it any surprise 90% of the people don’t trust the government? Trust starts with honest elections.
Isn't that a teensy weensy little bit more than the number President Trump requested in that perfect phone call to Georgia?
I agree, completely. What happens when they try to do that? The Democrats sue and scream voter suppression. The Republican’s back down. Or a liberal judge hands the Dem’s a victory, because the Republican’s aren’t willing to fight.
Not a hard process.
And, as we should all know by now, if the Democrats are screaming or suing about something, all that they’re doing is trying to protect one of their mechanisms to continue cheating. How they can try to argue that dead people should stay on the voting rolls is absurd, but they do it. And in doing, make sure they have voters to tilt elections their way.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.