Elections Expert Reveals Over 550,000 Registered Voters In Wisconsin Have a Registration Date of 1/1/1918 – 115,252 of Them VOTED in 2020

The Gateway Pundit ^ | January 21, 2022 | Julian Conradson

[BobL]

Got it, so they had to change the numbers after they were caught.

Why am I not surprised?

But thanks for the info!!!

[rlmorel]

I am just speculating (having seen other systems that default in a date) but I agree-this should never have been allowed.

This is likely seen as a feature not a bug for people who wish to execute fraud.

I wonder if it is because if they make up a DOB, then...that is explicit fraud if caught. But allowing a default date and skipping over it, well...that might be a “mistake”.

I have no idea, just speculating.

[Rightwing Conspiratr1]

[SmokingJoe]

Enlighten us, o wise one. Lemme guess? You defer to google? Hmm. Figures.

Nope. I defer to Freerepublic. There have been plenty of posts right here on FR about tough new anti ballot fraud laws passed by red/purple states to combat ballot fraud AFTER Biden's massive ballot
fraud in 2020.
Look it up. it's still right here on FR. Its not hard to find, even for a hard core leftist like you..

[LouAvul]

You can always tell when some fool on FR knows he's lost, viz. he resorts to name calling.

And many FReepers continue to post threads about discovery of voter fraud insisting Trump is still going into the White House midterm Biden, etc.

You're all alike. Grow up.

Don't post anymore to me. You're on ignore. I'm not going to waste my time.

[SmokingJoe]

You can always tell when some fool on FR knows he's lost, viz. he resorts to name calling.

Except both pejoratives apply to you. You started with the name calling when you lost and you've continued in that with your latest post.
No attempt to actually reply to my post apart spewing out abuse, cause you've lost the debate.

And many FReepers continue to post threads about discovery of voter fraud insisting Trump is still going into the White House midterm Biden, etc

Nothing whatsoever about that in my post. You just put it there so you can spew your usual far left nonsense.

You're all alike. Grow up

You and your left wing jokers need to grow up.
Oh wait, that cannot happen. You are too brain dead to grow up.

Don't post anymore to me. You're on ignore. I'm not going to waste my time

That is easily ignored.
And I am going to bet either you or one of your aliases is going to reply anyways.
Chuckle.

[Dr. Franklin]

Between the passage of HAVA and full implementation of statewide voter registration in 2006...Even so, as of fall 2021 there are still about 3,700 active voter records that contain default information for date of birth. In addition, about 120,000 records exist in the system with a default date of voter registration. Voters in either of those groups are not affected in any way by the default dates shown in their registration record.

So much blah, blah blah, which plainly admits that 16 years after the law was passed to clean up the voter registration rolls, approximately 120,000 names don't have accurate dates of birth recorded. It doesn't dispute that the actual number was 550,000 at the time of the 2020 election, or that 115,252 actually voted. In other words, the official response from the WI Election Commission is "WHO CARES IF OUR VOTER REGISTRATION ROLLS ARE WRONG?" The citizens of WI pay millions for voting machines and systems, but the executive branch administrators can't clean up the voter rolls.

If someone wanted to stuff the ballot box, this is exactly the kind of data gap in the official records that makes it harder to prove, which undermines faith in the official returns. Somehow, the Dems running the elections had no problems violating the law regarding drop boxes, absentee ballots, or collecting ballots from the incapacitated in the nursing homes, so we should also ignore 115,252 votes from people all listed as being born on Jan. 1, 1900? GP can be criticized for its sensationalism, but no one is obligated to accept the official non-answer about this absurd fact.

[MortMan]

Wouldn’t registration date default to the date when the record was created, rather than 1/1/1918? Unless an idiot programmed the database...

[Dr. Franklin]

Note: Not a fan of GP’s hyperventilating headlines!

Nor am I, but GP posts the news that others ignore. They report, we decide, unlike FAUX News.

Anyway, couple of items:
1. Therefore, it’s significant here that all GTWY pundit is doing is reporting what happened in WI’s General Assembly. No conspiracy theory, just what happened. I mean, FoxN won’t even touch investigations looking at those Magic Six States in 2020.
2. The data muscle behind this item appears to come from “WisconsinEye” (WISEYE); don’t know much about it, other than what they claim about themself:
3. All this is fine, and I hope some GoP staffers on the Hill, working for whatever committee might have Oversight here, is taking notes. (FEC? Ways & Means?)

The problem with point #3 is that the election records are only kept for 22 months after the election. That means without a court order or action by the state legislatures to preserve them, by the time the new Congress arrives in January 2023, the 2020 voting records would be long gone. We should be putting pressure on the RINOs to vote to preserve those records including the Congressional races. We could get some senators removed in some states that way. Any who refuse to vote for that, e.g., Vos in WI, or Jake "the Snake" Corman in PA, must be primaried and removed ASAP.

[Reily]

Agree!

[Lazamataz]

Gateway Pundit is either really way out there, or the rest of the media is even more corrupt than I suspected.

The latter.

Take the most corrupt 1% of the most corrupted corrupt organization, corrupt it to three times the corruption, then install a corrupt leader seven times more corrupt than the most corrupt member, and you will still only be 0.004% as corrupt as the media.

[SmokingJoe]

Wouldn't registration date default to the date when the record was created, rather than 1/1/1918? Unless an idiot programmed the database...

An idiot or more likely a Dem ballot fraud operative.

[Dr. Franklin]

I thought that as well but there are companies that provided data cleansing services so birthdates and such shouldn't be an issue.

But to pay for such services would mean that the people running the election actually wanted phantom voters to be easily identified. Without even needing a photo ID with a DOB, the DOB could have been solicited somehow before voting, and then added after the election. That record wasn't requested by the election admins. Admins supplement statutory law with their own rules all the time, but here they appear to have ignored the statute.

[LouAvul]

Like I said, stupid, I’m not reading any more of your posts. Or, is your reading comprehension as low as your IQ?

[Rightwing Conspiratr1]

Between the passage of HAVA and full implementation of statewide voter registration in 2006...Even so, as of fall 2021 there are still about 3,700 active voter records that contain default information for date of birth. In addition, about 120,000 records exist in the system with a default date of voter registration. Voters in either of those groups are not affected in any way by the default dates shown in their registration record.

So much blah, blah blah, which plainly admits that 16 years after the law was passed to clean up the voter registration rolls, approximately 120,000 names don't have accurate dates of birth recorded. It doesn't dispute that the actual number was 550,000 at the time of the 2020 election, or that 115,252 actually voted. In other words, the official response from the WI Election Commission is "WHO CARES IF OUR VOTER REGISTRATION ROLLS ARE WRONG?" The citizens of WI pay millions for voting machines and systems, but the executive branch administrators can't clean up the voter rolls.

You seem to have some basic reading comprehension problems. It's probably because you are so invested in the stolen election narrative you simply cannot accept reality.

1) There are only 3,700 active voters with default BIRTH dates.
2) There are 120,000 active voters with default REGISTRATION dates.
3) There are 550,000 INACTIVE voters in the system. They cannot vote unless they re-register.
Also...
4) It is against Wisconsin law to remove a voter record. Instead voter's status is changed from eligible to ineligible. See section 6.36 and 6.50 of Wisconsin election law.
And lastly...
5) Wisconsin doesn't give a rat's ass how you think its election law should work.

[SmokingJoe]

You “are not reading” my posts but you are replying?
Only a brain dead, paid far left troll like you could come up with such nonsense.
What more nonsense ya got?

[Dr. Franklin]

You seem to have some basic reading comprehension problems. It's probably because you are so invested in the stolen election narrative you simply cannot accept reality

A good lawyer always cites his/her authority. In this case your authority, the WI Election Commission, has 5 of its 6 members under a felony criminal referral for election fraud from the Racine County Sheriff:
https://thefederalist.com/2021/11/04/racine-county-sheriff-calls-for-felony-charges-against-wisconsin-election-commissioners/
Dead voters certainly cannot vote. However, with all of the other fraud in WI, no one would be at all surprised if some had voted for them. Voter in WI want to live under a Republican form of government, which you plainly don't give a rat's ass about. Good luck trolling for Vos on this forum.

[Dr. Franklin]

However, with all of the other fraud in WI, no one would be at all surprised if someone had voted for them. Voters in WI want to live under a Republican form of government...