Posted on 01/22/2022 7:04:50 AM PST by Dr. Franklin
On Wednesday, the Wisconsin Assembly held another election integrity hearing to present evidence of voter fraud and irregularities that have been found in their investigation of the rigged 2020 election.
And just like last month’s election hearing, they dropped some serious bombshells.
Yesterday’s hearing built on those findings and presented more questions for the Wisconsin Elections Commission (WEC), which has failed to answer previous questions on the 2020 election.
They did however respond to the reported 119,283 active voters who have been registered for over 100 years, but their weak response just didn’t cut it.
Wisconsin Assembly Attorney Dean O’Donnell, who is an expert analyst on the election integrity team, called out the official explanation that was given, saying “it does not hold water,” before dropping some more of his team’s jaw-dropping findings of corruption in the 2020 election.
According to O’Donnell, they found an astronomical 569,277 registered voters had an application date of 1/1/1918, which accounts for roughly one out of every fourteen voters in the state’s database.
Oh, and wait, there’s more. One out of every five of those “phantom voters” apparently cast a ballot in 2020 – a whopping 115,252 of them to be exact.
Insane.
I wonder how many checked the box for Biden… I’d say it’s somewhere between 100% and 100%,
(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...
Standard Operating Procedure nationwide
“This is a database error, not fraud.”
So, you want to run an election where over 10% of you electorate is unidentifiable due to database errors? That kind of malfeasance by a public official deserves to be in prison.
Did it occur to you that the voters with that birth date were entered fraudulently?
“””According to O’Donnell, they found an astronomical 569,277 registered voters had an application date of 1/1/1918,”””
I was thinking the 1/1/1918 date had something to do with the Women’s Suffrage Amendment, but that amendment did not go into effect until 1920.
wrong, the elections are rigged.
Right. When I am trying to determine the veracity of this side or that side in an argument, I often have to look outside the focus for other things.
In this case...which side, us or them, is dead set against cleansing the voter rolls? That would be THEM.
In this case...which side, us or them, is calling for cleansing the voter rolls to eliminate that corruption exploit vector? That would be US.
And there is no good reason, none whatsoever, NOT to clean up the voter rolls. The ONLY reason they don’t want to do it, is that it removes an exploitable chink in the armor against election fraud. One that I am certain has been exploited for decades by those corrupt pieces of Leftist crap.
“””They REGISTERED in 1918, so that means they are all at least 123 years old. It must be the good Wisconsin water and clean outdoor living. I’m impressed they are spry enough to get to the polling places.”””
It is worse than that. These people had to be 21 years old to register to vote in 1918. So they are now 144 years old. It has got to be the Wisconsin Cheese that creates a long life.
Having worked in computer systems, there are instances when the DOB isn’t known and not entered, and it defaulted in 1/1/1901.
When I see that, I see a workflow issue. That is, the DOB is a required field, something has to go in there, and someone wrote the software to default in 1/1/1901, and you could just skip over it when entering the demographic data.
It’s the default if a birthdate isn’t entered
Or they registered people without their knowledge and didn’t know the birth date. then they voted for them
It’s the default if a birthdate isn’t entered
Why, exactly, would a birth date not be entered? How could one determine if the potential voter is of age without that info?
2020 election was a coup facilitated by the CCP, other foreign intetests, and traitors in our own government.
They didn’t know the person’s birth date.
The republiCAN’Ts will get out of the way when we get the backbone to throw them out.
“When I see that, I see a workflow issue. That is, the DOB is a required field, something has to go in there, and someone wrote the software to default in 1/1/1901, and you could just skip over it when entering the demographic data.”
I agree that’s most likely. But in Texas, our new law will REJECT those applications as unverifiable and people without DOBs (at least the ones that exist) will get a letter in the mail telling them to complete their form.
Just having the computer default this way is a SERIOUS PROBLEM, but the information is there to investigate now, and if the people really do exist and are not otherwise registered, then no issue.
But it does make me wonder as to why people would leave their DOB blank, since I suspect that most people over 2 years old know what it is (or shouldn’t be voting, if they no longer remember it).
They didn’t know the person’s birth date.
If that is indeed the case, it’s an invalid registrant. The vote doesn’t count, period.
No birthday means fraudulent means to vote fraudulently
“Apparently this has to be debunked every month because Gateway Pundit is run by liars and fags who depend on clicks by ignorant people.”
If they’re willing to let these people slide for 16 YEARS without adding-in birthdates, then they do have a VERY SERIOUS problem. Maybe not directly fraud, but a database of voters very susceptible to such.
Just for starters, it is nearly IMPOSSIBLE to remove dead people from the databases if all that is known is a name.
“I’d love to believe that this is a computer glitch. A simple computer or data input error. But I can’t. I can’t believe that because I know in my heart and mind that the left stole the election. It’s that simple.”
As far as I’m concerned, the 89% TURNOUT in the presidential election (more than 10 points higher than any other state, or ever in Wisconsin) is all the proof that I need that funny stuff was going on.
It’s a NO-BRAINER for me because of that, regardless of what the DNC operatives here claim.
Yeah, right. Whoever was entering the data just looked the other way and accepted the invalid data. That is fraud. For something as important as voter registration, ZERO default values should be accepted. A default value for anything should invalidate that voter registration.
Why program a default value in the first place? Just program it so any blank data or obviously fraudulent data makes it impossible to commit the record.
Either the data input clerks are committing fraud or the database designer or administrator are committing fraud.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.