Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Elections Expert Reveals Over 550,000 Registered Voters In Wisconsin Have a Registration Date of 1/1/1918 – 115,252 of Them VOTED in 2020
The Gateway Pundit ^ | January 21, 2022 | Julian Conradson

Posted on 01/22/2022 7:04:50 AM PST by Dr. Franklin

On Wednesday, the Wisconsin Assembly held another election integrity hearing to present evidence of voter fraud and irregularities that have been found in their investigation of the rigged 2020 election.

And just like last month’s election hearing, they dropped some serious bombshells.

Yesterday’s hearing built on those findings and presented more questions for the Wisconsin Elections Commission (WEC), which has failed to answer previous questions on the 2020 election.

They did however respond to the reported 119,283 active voters who have been registered for over 100 years, but their weak response just didn’t cut it.

Wisconsin Assembly Attorney Dean O’Donnell, who is an expert analyst on the election integrity team, called out the official explanation that was given, saying “it does not hold water,” before dropping some more of his team’s jaw-dropping findings of corruption in the 2020 election.

According to O’Donnell, they found an astronomical 569,277 registered voters had an application date of 1/1/1918, which accounts for roughly one out of every fourteen voters in the state’s database.

Oh, and wait, there’s more. One out of every five of those “phantom voters” apparently cast a ballot in 2020 – a whopping 115,252 of them to be exact.

Insane.

I wonder how many checked the box for Biden… I’d say it’s somewhere between 100% and 100%,

(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: audit; election; electionfraud; electionintegrity; fraud; integrity; votefraud; voter; voterfraud; voters; wi; wisconsin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-158 next last
To: Dr. Franklin

Thank you very much for posting. With the national media blackout and no one really tracking the details for us other than Steve Bannon who I can’t watch everyday it’s very hard to see any progress.


41 posted on 01/22/2022 7:29:49 AM PST by Golden Eagle (What's in YOUR injection?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rightwing Conspiratr1
Apparently this has to be debunked every month because Gateway Pundit is run by liars and fags who depend on clicks by ignorant people.

That would apply to the fake news media you linked to, not Gateway Pundit.
But hey, just keep posting your normal lies, fake news and disinformation. Nobody believes ya anyways

42 posted on 01/22/2022 7:30:40 AM PST by SmokingJoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: 1_Rain_Drop

I think it was during that call the Raffensberger stated that only 2 dead people voted in the 2020 election, when it was much more than that and that he didn’t sign a Consent Decree, that President Trump had a copy of, that said..Consent Decree...signed by Raffensberger.


43 posted on 01/22/2022 7:31:06 AM PST by qaz123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Mean Daddy
You bring up an interesting point regarding birthdates.

It's odd that the article doesn't discuss birthdates at all. I wonder how many birthdates are AFTER the 1/1/1918 registration date. The would support the position that there is a database error with the registration dates.

44 posted on 01/22/2022 7:32:03 AM PST by SSS Two
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Franklin

Part of that alleged 81 million votes......./s


45 posted on 01/22/2022 7:33:25 AM PST by cranked
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmokingJoe

Yet, nobody is doing anything about it. Who is in the White Hut? Case closed.


46 posted on 01/22/2022 7:33:35 AM PST by LouAvul (Farewell America. We barely knew you. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Franklin

Could not happen without the help of the officials who oversee the voting registrations.


47 posted on 01/22/2022 7:34:01 AM PST by I want the USA back (Government is to be feared much more than the chicom virus.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: qaz123
Makes sense. But that's not going to happen.

This is America, where the myth of a free and fair election must be maintained, even in the face of mounting evidence that it was anything but.

If elected officials burst this myth, then it brings their OWN elections into question.

This was the Warren Commission of elections. Lot's of "magic bullets" but everyone will go along with the narrative because it's in their interests to do so.

48 posted on 01/22/2022 7:34:35 AM PST by TontoKowalski (You can call me "Dick.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Franklin
When do the RINOs get out of the way, or get run over?

Be careful with this info. Our Biden Republicans believe that a discussion of voter fraud is disinformation generated by Democrat trolls.

49 posted on 01/22/2022 7:35:10 AM PST by JonPreston (Q: Never have so many, been so wrong, so often)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SSS Two

That was my first vote as well. Which means that if it is a data error, it needs to be scrubbed from the data base. No verifiable address, no proof, no right to vote. expunge them from the database.


50 posted on 01/22/2022 7:35:17 AM PST by silent majority rising
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: BobL

Thinking about this:

Registration Date .... 1/1/1918

Were folks back in the early 1900s registered to vote when they were born. Lets just say that of all 550k, they registered at varying times. If folks were registering when they turned 18 or a few years later, when were these people actually born? 1900, late 1890s?


51 posted on 01/22/2022 7:35:20 AM PST by qaz123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
Is there documentation backing up this claim?

That is what I want to see.

If this is provable, WI election results must be decertified.

You cannot have a half a million voters registered that are over 115 years old and claim to be a valid election.

What proof is available?

52 posted on 01/22/2022 7:35:26 AM PST by USS Alaska (NUKE ALL MOOSELIMB TERRORISTS, NOW.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Franklin

I’d love to believe that this is a computer glitch. A simple computer or data input error. But I can’t. I can’t believe that because I know in my heart and mind that the left stole the election. It’s that simple.


53 posted on 01/22/2022 7:36:08 AM PST by Artemis Webb (Be kind to each other, unless the other guy is a dumbass.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SSS Two

Good guess. I detest the lazy programmers that allow the default value to be accepted as valid “data”.


54 posted on 01/22/2022 7:36:40 AM PST by mad_as_he$$
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Franklin

Everyone knows the 2020 election was stolen and everyone knows the GOP was in on it. Never vote GOP always vote MAGA. If John Cornyln gets a seriously primary challenger he is toast in Texas.


55 posted on 01/22/2022 7:37:21 AM PST by jpsb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LouAvul

I’m pretty much with you on that.


56 posted on 01/22/2022 7:37:41 AM PST by qaz123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Franklin

If checked carefully in the States where a suspect fraud vote was considered, similar things would be found, no question!


57 posted on 01/22/2022 7:37:43 AM PST by maxwellsmart_agent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Franklin

One of the few things the democrats do well, voter fraud. It’s how they survive. Nobody knows how many different tactics they use to steal elections, but they are numerous, and diverse, and becomes more complex with each election. Of course there are going to be a lot anomalies that pop up after a democrat victory, but they can clean up the loose ends later. Corrupt judges take care of that. The two most frustrating aspects of their operations: a gop and conservatives who deny the obvious. Usually stating that “there’s no proof”.


58 posted on 01/22/2022 7:38:18 AM PST by robel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LouAvul

You actually expect the ballot fraud exponents in the White House to do something about ballot fraud do you?
Plenty has/is being done about ballot fraud BY REPUBLICANS. Look it up.


59 posted on 01/22/2022 7:38:23 AM PST by SmokingJoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: ProtectOurFreedom

That would be 121 years old.


60 posted on 01/22/2022 7:38:52 AM PST by ConservativeMind (Trump: Befuddling Democrats, Republicans, and the Media for the benefit of the US and all mankind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-158 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson