Posted on 11/20/2021 11:29:38 AM PST by UMCRevMom@aol.com
Unlike the United States, the European Union is very transparent about the number of adverse effects and fatalities from people who were vaccinated and the numbers are staggering. According to their reports through November 13th, they had 30,551 fatalities and 1,163,356 people who had adverse reactions to the vaccines. The European Union had 448 million people in 2020 compared to 331 million in the United States. You do the math on this.
According to European Medicines Agency, an official site for the European Union, the data for the report came from ADRreports.eu portal that allows users to keep track of the latest vaccine adverse effects. All of the data on the website comes from EudraVigilance that gathers it’s information from regulatory agencies and from pharmaceutical companies that hold the licenses for the vaccines. They do not report the same in the United States and the CDC does not want to make the reports on the J & J vaccine until 2076.
What are they hiding?
If 30,000+ suspected Clot Shot deaths were reported, Tim, how large do you suppose the total is (reported plus unreported)?
Thanks to upchuck for the link!
This vax/not-vax thing is just a canard to focus the clueless masses away from the real problems in this socialist government.
Find somebody to blame, denigrate them, blame them for all manner of unfounded problems, and isolate them. Hitler had great success with the Jews. An end in sight? Not before you’ve convinced the 2022 and 2024 American public we HAVE to have a billion unsolicited absentee ballots mailed out to P.O. boxes and vacant lots..
The real problem here is that their ‘plan’ involves a concocted gene drug that no one knows what will happen with in the long term and the entirety of this administration is armed to the teeth to defend the lie so their goals will be achieved.
Oh, we’ll know what’s in those vaxxes in the long term like 50 years from now; the un-vaxxed are the new people to hate.
That's a valid challenge. But, one I reject. Never in the history of man, has there been MORE data available about one disease. There is so much, it's practically overload.
I could spend the rest of this year posting data that proves my assertions. Or, at the very least, show very strong correlations. The data is PLENTY available for anyone who wants to spend the time looking for it.
I'm not a 'crusader'. I have a life, and a very full one at that. I'm here to offer my 'insights'. People can take or leave them as they like.
I suspect that you and I share many of the same beliefs regarding COVID, and the gross global over-reaction. I think it's all been very over-blown, initially for political reasons, and now because.. well, we've set a standard. Now, we can't back off it. I think most of what has been done is criminal. Especially, for the harm it has caused our children.
But, that doesn't change my opinion on the relative effectiveness of these "shots".. I don't really even like calling them 'vaccines'. They lower the chances for serious illness and death. If you look, you can find all the data you want that proves this.
I think much of our death data has been over-stated, but... I can't ignore this:
https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/vsrr/covid19/excess_deaths.htm
We've had a LOT of excess deaths in the US in the past 2 years. This isn't "Nothing". It's a disease that kills a lot of people who are health-compromised.
I'm not one who thinks we have to vaccinate 100% of the population. But, I do think, for MANY people, the shots improve their chances.
Of course, as you say... these mRNA shots are NEW technology. NO ONE really knows what the long-term affects might be. That's one of the main reasons I oppose mandates. My comments are strictly limited to the data we have available, NOW, about the relative benefits that have been shown.. globally.. over and over.
That is: After the shots roll out, death rates go WAY down.
Not “clot shot death”...
Deaths within 30 days of getting a shot.
What is the NORMAL number of deaths in a 30 day period for THAT many people?
Well, yes. But in 50 years this country won’t exist anymore, at least in any recognizable form.
Off now, to play CATAN with my kids and friends. :-)
Not running away.. there will be more to follow, I’m sure.
Ransomware won’t go away this easily. He’s either a true believer or a paid poster.
—> The data is VERY CLEAR: For MOST Americans, these vaccines tremendously improve your chances of surviving Covid.
This needs a fix…
The data is VERY CLEAR: For MOST Americans, there is a >99.5% chance of surviving Covid.
The vaxx *may* help anyone in the <.5% survival category to avoid hospitalization or death.
Or it may not.
You can still get vaxxed and die, or live with the side effects.
And for every person “saved” from a Covid death because they were vaxxed, another +45 die of vaxx related causes.
And no one knows yet the long-term results regarding autoimmune diseases, cancer, or ADE.
By avoiding the vaxx, you have a *100 guarantee* of avoiding ALL vaxx side effects now and in the future.
… AND a ~ 99.5% chance of surviving Covid.
Darn good odds!
I think we’re going to have to look at all deaths adjusting for risks, and vaccines as an independent risk factor.
The governments are trying to eliminate the unvaccinated control group so they can hide the comparison of of vaccinated and unvaccinated.
Remember this thing is still an experiment.
It is telling that the CDC does not even look at transmission rates in recovered covid patients. Obviously they want to hide and spin the data.
Overall death rates are harder for governments to hide or spin.
No it doesn't.
A death occurring sometime after a vaccination isn't necessarily a death from a vaccination.
I couldn't help noticing your list of important facts didn't include this from EudoraVigilance:
"The information on this website relates to suspected side effects , i.e. medical events that have been observed following the use of a medicine, but which are not necessarily related to or caused by the medicine.Information on suspected side effects should not be interpreted as meaning that the medicine or the active substance causes the observed effect or is unsafe to use. Only a detailed evaluation and scientific assessment of all available data allows for robust conclusions to be drawn on the benefits and risks of a medicine."
We don't know how many deaths, if any are from the vaccine and this report doesn't tell us.
No matter what your age the vax does far more than kill you immediately. It destroys your immune system which will never be repaired. Not to mention it does not stop the virus from spreading or keep you from getting it.
wonder who is funding these experimental shots...
i’ve never heard of or seen any money being appropriated through government spending bills to cover any related costs concerning these so called “vaccines”...
“...fake data.”
You know this , how?
Could it be from the FDA, CDC, WHO, pure as the wind driven snow, not lying to us for two plus years MSM narrative ?
ALL counter narrative information suppressed/censored by FecesBook, Twatt, MSM and all government sources. Why is that?
I can hear you now: “because it if misinformation”.
Well then let it out there, expose it, prove it.
By the way, go ahead and show that these (not) vaccines have not accrued more ‘adverse events’ and deaths than ALL other previous real vaccines combined.
So - no worries.
So - no worries.
It would be instructive to notice how much of the CDC is verbiage, words piled onto words. One observes the technical term "estimates" in their "data." This is consistent with the technical terms "presumed" and "assumed" from the April 2020 document on how to amplify the identity of a Covd death. Such words to not sit well with the requirements of hard data. From another source one finds that the death rate in the US is still lower than in 1950, and a rise in the death rate from its lowest point began in about 2014, not with the advent of the "pandemic." https://www.macrotrends.net/countries/USA/united-states/death-rate How do "estimate" and "presumed" fit with a rigorous collection of data points? Yet this is what the WHO and CDC have advised. https://www.who.int/classifications/icd/Guidelines_Cause_of_Death_COVID-19.pdf?ua=1 Your comment combines "overestimated" but you "can't ignore" estimates? That seems a dissonance of some sort. Still, the overall hard data says: Global deaths through 23 months -- ( 5,105,270 / 7,906,949,863 ) x 100 = 0.0645 %. Prove that wrong without resorting to estimates and presumptions, please.
re: “Still, they were eventually hit pretty hard. There is NO ESCAPING this disease.”
Did you see what you did there?
An anachronistic fallacy; cart before horse. It took TIME for India to CATCH ON to using Ivermectin. AND they were successful when they FINALLY used Ivermectin.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.