Posted on 07/20/2021 4:51:15 AM PDT by Dr. Franklin
Challenges to the presidential electors for GA, MI, NV, and WI all failed when the House members making the objections failed to gain the support of a single U.S. Senator. Together these states comprised 48 EV, which was more than enough to flip the election result. But what if a duly elected U.S. Senator was unable to participate in that process because a fraudulent pretender was wrongfully certified in his/her place? Would that make the entire Jan. 6-7th certification of Joe and Ho's "victory" null and void in either a quo warranto action, or reopening of that certification by Congress?
Of which you are aware.
Other Constitutional scholars disagreed.
The enemy has pet pawns? Who knew?
You’re free to think whatever you wish. You’re posts show you to be more of a fantasist than a critical thinker and the same goes for those who also believe that there is some sort of mechanism for reinstating President Trump. The fact is even if Biden dies in office; if the 25th is invoked, or if he is impeached and the removed, and even if the election is proven a complete fraud President Trump will not be reinstated because there is no provision in the Constitution for this scenario. It will be up to we the people in 2024 to reinstate President Trump through the electoral process, which is the only mechanism for him becoming President again.
Why would you say that?
The United States has recognized Taiwan as part of China since 1983, and arguably since 1973.
No US President, and certainly no US Congress, since then would even contemplate war with China for a second over this internal Chinese affair.
Not to mention that China "conquering" Taiwan is going to be like Germany "conquering" Austria in 1938.
No, they don't.
Can you show any evidence that that is true?
Absolutely correct and deserves repeating. We conservatives lack any institutional power and since we are forced to the fringes of the discussion are susceptible to manipulation and misinformation. The intelligence agencies who were probably behind the whole Q-anon psy-op are probably that same people pushing this BS.
There is no constitutional legal mechanism for unseating a sitting president except impeachment and conviction, or via the 25th amendment; both of those result in Kamala Harris being president, not Trump.
Given your self-proclaimed expertise on the Constitution then instead of going off on an irrelevant detour why not just tell me where I'm wrong?
Aware or not, the one thing I can be confident of is you seldom know what you're talking about.
The enemy has pet pawns? Who knew?
What makes them wrong and the your 'constitutional scholars' right?
“the only thing we can do is to throw earned shade on the legitimacy of His Fraudulency’s presidency.”
Legal actions.
If attorneys general with a regard for the law can be found we need to prosecute every one who double counted or spoiled ballots or submitted fake ballots or discarded Military ballots from the precinct up to the Secretary of State and Governor level.
That would make the news. But for how long. Lol. I really thought the video in GA of ballots being pulled from under the table would be huge news. They ignored it like it never happened. I think there is a chance biden does not make the whole 4 years. Unless they hide him from the public for the last few years.
Started World War II, didn't it?
Actually WWII started with Japan conquering Manchuria.
I hope you are right on the prosecution of the fraudsters, Pete. As there will be no support from the federal Justice Dept. or US attorneys (have you visited Hillary Clinton, Hunter Biden or John Brennan, among many others in jail recently?), we have to rely on the State AGs and local county prosecutors to get the job done. Some solitary confinement like they have done with those prosecuted for walking into the Capitol, would be a lot more deserved by this bunch. And it could crack the lower level election officials involved in it to tell the truth about who orchestrated the fraud and who conveyed the instructions to implement it.
You know very well that Abortion and Homosexual marriage are not in the US constitution, but our courts have put them in there anyways.
The fundamental point here is that you can put stuff in the US Constitution that is not in there, and so the argument "But that isn't in the US Constitution!" is meaningless when confronted with sufficient political power.
Exactly. And those pretending there’s some common law method are liars or fools. The whole point of a written constitution is to supersede the application of common law.
So far as you are aware.
What makes them wrong and the your 'constitutional scholars' right?
There is no sincerity in your inquiry so I shall not bother making an effort to explain it to you.
For us it started with Lend/Lease. That was the consequence of Hitler expanding German control of other countries, of which Austria was the first, I think.
FDR’s “Arsenal of Democracy” speech was, for all intents and purposes a declaration of war on Germany.
Yup. Everyone knew it was coming.
Ther deep state globalist masters own the hypocrite Pence.
Ooops, you left out the Constitutional provisions of an unqualified President-elect due to an UNLAWFUL election. Fraud vitiates any legal basis for resident Biden to claim authority of POTUS. When someone steals your car, they don't get to keep it when they're caught, do they? So when you read the Constitutional presentation of elections of POTUS, on a clause by clause basis, an average reader gets a different perspective you seem incapable of understanding. So keep it to yourself, and let the adults talk without your whining.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.