Given your self-proclaimed expertise on the Constitution then instead of going off on an irrelevant detour why not just tell me where I'm wrong?
You know very well that Abortion and Homosexual marriage are not in the US constitution, but our courts have put them in there anyways.
The fundamental point here is that you can put stuff in the US Constitution that is not in there, and so the argument "But that isn't in the US Constitution!" is meaningless when confronted with sufficient political power.