Posted on 07/20/2021 4:51:15 AM PDT by Dr. Franklin
So we’re expected to live with fraud as the rats destroy the US? If fraud and cheating are accepted because there’s not a known way to overturn the fraud that makes it acceptable? What kind of example is this ?? If there’s no way to overturn fraud then it’s time to figure out what needs to be done because THIS WILL NOT BE THE FIRST TIME THIS HAPPENS! Escpecially if it gets waved off ..what a crock.
Pence is a very good man who doesn’t have the fortitude to be in an executive position at a time when the Communists mount ferocious daily attacks.
I believe that the courts are reluctant to step in. Thus, quo warranto is not likely to be in play UNTIL a legislature decertifies their state’s election.
Just my opinion.
We are now in uncharted waters.
Sadly David Perdue is only marginally better than a Democrat. He would no more challenge the electoral college than the man in the moon.
... you would rather discourage any further thought of how it could be accomplished without my thoughts
You're neither a chess player or strategist, because you obviously are too lazy to contemplate removing the most recently elected Democrats (and RINOs) by quo warranto due to UNLAWFUL elections. So all your pessimistic wool-gathering has no basis, does it?
Yep. Anything else ids just wishful thinking. You are only fooling yourself. And to date, nothing meaningful has been done. Expect weeping and wailing be the Democrats like the World has never seen should an honest election plan ever be devised. >
Clearly you missed the removal of Congress persons by quo warranto in the past. Fraud vitiates everything. Congress critters elected with UNLAWFUL elections have no Constitutional 'right' to their seats in Congress, and your fantasies don't accommodate this landscape. And yes, this is based on the probability that election fraud can, and has already been presented.
Start the decertification process
Who in the world thinks that a Democrat controlled House or Senate is going to revoke recognition of a member allied to them? It won’t happen no matter how strongly you can prove the seat was awarded fraudulently. Outside of the legislative body ejecting them there is no legal mechanism or provision for removing someone from the legislature before the end of their term.
I absolutely believe that these audits are necessary, should go forward and will prove fraud occurred. But to think that a single Democrat will be unseated before the 2022 elections because of it is incredibly stupid, naïve and delusional. The best outcome we can get is strengthening the election laws and enforcement and removing corrupt election officials so we can have cleaner elections going forward.
It’s sad because my dad was a marine and had no problem with people having what ever guns they want and never worried about things like covid or bird flus. In the last few years as he has gotten older and now worries about covid (even though he already had it and then took the vaccine) and is asking me what I think about gun control. He now is not having a problem with them taking war type weapons. He is quoting things you hear on the nightly news. I asked him what changed and he wants the bad people to not have them. I just laughed and said the bad guys aren’t going to give up their guns so if you take them it will only be from people that use them for the right reasons. He just said we have to do something. His views are out of fear of the BS being pumped on the news. Trying to get him to watch a different station. Newsmax or OAN.
I appreciate your efforts on this topic.
Wrong. Your opinion only, based on your assumptions and not grounded in any factual evidence.
Also helps the enemy when you keep repeating it.
Trump had constitutional scholars advising him on this point, and it is clear that the position of President of the Senate is absolutely discretionary or they would not have specified it.
It is not a formality. It is not a kabuki dance.
As are your posts on the subject.
Trump had constitutional scholars advising him on this point, and it is clear that the position of President of the Senate is absolutely discretionary or they would not have specified it.
Other Constitutional scholars disagreed.
Most naive thing i've read in weeks.
If you don't fix election fraud, you fix nothing, and especially not debt.
Notice how I ignored your gratuitous insult and answered you civilly ! So why don't you take your fantasies and do something with them too !
I think that if China attacks Taiwan, your argument will turn out to be quite wrong.
The chances of China attacking Taiwan are greatly enhanced with Joe the idiot pretending to be in charge.
Given your expertise in constitutional matters, I was wondering if you could possibly point out to me where in the constitution it creates a right to abortion and homosexual marriage?
I don't recall reading any of that in there.
1) Agree to reopen the matter of the electoral votes; and
2) Received objections from a House Member and a US Senator; and therefore
3) Undertook to rule on the objections
How long would it take this Congress (in seconds, or minutes if you prefer) to dismiss the objections and recertify Biden and Harris?
EXCEPT, if it can be shown that one (or more) of the senate seats was wrongfully awarded. At the state level, they have the power to de-certify, and THAT would be impossible for the media to ignore.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.