ISN'T THAT EXACTLY WHAT WAS JUST DONE, AND SHE AGREED WITH IT?
Posted on 04/21/2021 2:23:02 PM PDT by KeyLargo
Crowder: Gutless Gutfeld bows to the MOB
Fox News host Greg Gutfeld caught the attention of Steven Crowder after Gutfeld's comments about the Derek Chauvin guilty verdict.
"I'm going to get really selfish ... I am glad that he was found guilty on all charges even if he might not be guilty of all charges, I am glad he was found guilty on all charges because I want a verdict that keeps this country from going up in flames," Gutfeld said Monday.
Judge Jeanine Pirro disagreed, saying, "We do not sacrifice individuals for the sake of how someone feels."
Crowder called Gutfeld's conclusion "cowardice," later adding that many pundits in the media, especially those living in New York, are out of touch with the rest of the country.
Watch the clip to hear more from Crowder. Can't watch? Download the podcast here.
Yep. Lost all respect for that toad.
Nothing like a good old fashion lynching or blood letting to keep the mob pacified.
Just one question for Gutless, once that box is opened and we say it’s ok to convict an innocent person, when and where does it stop? How about we make it an annual event and the everybody draws lots to determine who is the sacrificial lamb?
What an idiot.
The Constitution and Bill of Rights are gone. We are now under mob rule.
That's liberal think. This will only make things worse by emboldening BLM to lynch more people.
ISN'T THAT EXACTLY WHAT WAS JUST DONE, AND SHE AGREED WITH IT?
Should change his name to Greg Gutless
Last I heard, she supported the verdict completely.
Jeanine likes a little juice mixed into her Kool-Aid.
...................................
Yes, and yes!
I don’t think the jury had any choice but to convict. Since they were not sequestered and, no doubt, the mob already knew their names, photos and addresses and since Kerosene Maxine had told them to start torching the city if “justice” wasn’t delivered, the jurors couldn’t have done anything else without causing physical harm to themselves and a lot of other innocent people. The jurors knew, deep down, that the prosecution left motions for appeal in the case big enough to drive an armored car through so they knowingly sacrificed Chauvin for the likelihood that the conviction would be more quietly reversed or reduced maybe two months later by some anonymous appeals judge.
I hate that it was necessary but I do think the jury did the right thing. Mobs rarely have sustaining power so you keep the angry masses mollified for the moment then overturn it quietly later. I don’t like it but I can see the wisdom in it.
if you are ok with the guilty verdict because you think it will keep the country from going up in flames, you are a moron.
this is a victory for the marxists. they will keep doing what works.
....................................................
Yes, and yes!
Gutfield is typical of the so-called “conservatives” who live in big cities and whose political philosophy is based on whatever keeps them safe and entertained.
These are people who have no problem with Nazis as long as the Nazis keep the riff-raff out of their neighborhoods.
...................................................
Yes, and yes!
Sorry—you only asked about Judge Jeanine. Gutfeld agreed with the verdict, took a deep breath, and blurted out the subject of this thread. Gutfeld’s emotion was raw in that moment. That is why I give him a pass on this one. I expect he will come around.
Floyd had much better video and optics that could be used to enflame the stupid and shown out of context by the msm.
All they care about is being invited to the good parties.
He was anti Trump in the beginning. Anyone that couldn’t see that Trump was pro American can’t be very smart.
....................................
Yes!
Yet another reason I went cold turkey from watching fox.
I’m not saying that Chauvin should have gotten off scott-free here. I think it was poor policework, if nothing else. The procedures do need to be addressed, but who had the power all this time to address those procedures?
She disagreed because he’s only supporting the verdict because it won’t lead to unrest. She supports the verdict because she thinks it was actually the right decision. One is a cowardly, unthinking approach. The other is a view reached honestly that happens to differ from that of the average FOX News viewer. Huge difference.
She disagreed with his rationale for supporting the verdict. She still believes the verdict was correct on the merits.
Well, i WAS thinking of watching his new show...
Crowder is much better and funnier.
You just keep telling people that these things are local stories that shouldn’t become super-hyped international headlines. You say it over and over and over.
Thank you!
Keep it up, please; needs doing.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.