For me, the video came across as more honest and convincing because it WASN’T “professionally” done. One reason we love Trump is because he isn’t smoooth and slick.
1:36:19 to 1:49:40 MARY FANNING—This portion of the video should have been dynamite. But instead of properly and concisely presenting the evidence, Mike Lindell and Mary Fanning miss the boat. We see glimpses of a spreadsheet that, we are told, are foreign intrusions into 2995 counties before, during and after November 3, 2020. I believe it. The data we can see does show China as the big culprit. But we only see a fraction of the take and at no time are we informed how this information in Mary Fanning’s hands was collected and stored. I had hoped that Mary would have taken some steps to explain how she and her groups got their hands on this potentially bombshell data.
What I found equally frustrating is Fanning’s lack of curiosity or effort in sorting the data by State and County. This could have been a stunning follow up to the DePerno interview. DePerno’s evidence showing there was a massive movement of improperly counted votes away from Trump going to Biden in Antrim County could have been corroborated by Fanning. Sadly, that opportunity is ignored in this video. Just a passing reference to Antrim.
----------------
It is Texas Hold'em. Now, is not the time to reveal all of the cards in the hand.
Who the heck is Larry Johnson and why should I care what he thinks?
Mike apparently gets on his nerves but at least Mike put his money where his mouth is and Mike is willing to take the tremendous amount of criticism and numerous boycotts of his business.
What’s Larry done to expose election fraud?
Another armchair quarterback. Let’s see you do better.
Has anyone watched the video at the end of the article?
The only problem I had with the video was Lindell’s talking over the interviewees. (Must have taken lessons from Hannity!) All in all, the presentation should, SHOULD, make federal law enforcement to look at the fraudulent election evidence. That said, Lindell is a treasure!
I have to say, when I heard it was a 3 hour presentation, I was turned off and haven’t watched it. I would like to see the evidence presented in a concise form and don’t want to hear a lecture. Just the facts and evidence.
Election Fraud - bump for later....
Funny, all these critics, yet no one else stepped to the plate and forked over their own money to codify this theft.
Let’s other step up and do a better job — at their own expense.
As is, "Absolute Proof" is a noble effort, but it will not change many minds. That is the standard here -- does it change minds?
The original plan was to have the evidence Mike presented vetted in multiple courts as part of Sidney Powell’s and Lin Wood’s lawsuits. This was supposed to have been done before the electors were certified so we would end up with an illegitimate regime in power.
For some reason this never happened and everything got kicked up to the SCOTUS. They will probably agree with Mike that that the evidence of fraud is quite good but it should have been brought up when we could do something about it and not disenfranchise all those fictional Biden voters.
Maybe if Mike had hired Jonathan Turley or Alan Dershowitz to do the gig it might have worked better except they were running the other way the last time I looked.
Waiting for Larry Johnson’s video. I know it will be perfect.
Mike may be the last hope of someone to try a lawsuit with Dominion et al.. So far anyone sued has backed off quick. If no one stands up to the legal threat they win.
HOCKEYPUCK! It was a well done video and warranting a full investigation of the fraud. How much evidence does one need when a crime is so blatantly obvious. This reminds me of the movie “ A GUIDE FOR THE MARRIED MAN “ where Joey Bishop is caught in bed with this gal by his wife and he gets up and gets dressed and keeps saying “ what woman “, “ where “, “ I don’t see any woman “.
I have not seen anyone prove that the IP addresses shown by Mary Fanning are incorrect. An explanation of how this data was collected could add to its veracity.
.
Thanks, bfl.
the faux election was a sham and EVERYONE knows it! Anybody telling you otherwise is a just a liar.