I have not seen anyone prove that the IP addresses shown by Mary Fanning are incorrect. An explanation of how this data was collected could add to its veracity.
RE: An explanation of how this data was collected could add to its veracity.
Maybe Mike Lindell can do and update on his movie with all these constructive inputs taken into account. I for one am curious as to how her team was able to gather the IP and MAC Addreses.
Also, an introduction to Mary Fanning’s background would be helpful.
I also have been waiting to hear where the IP trace data came from. Is this inherent in dominion system kernel logs? Which logs?
I've collected IP trace data with wireshark (in order to analyze cert processing) but one needs to set up the capture beforehand. Are such captures part of a security protocol for the system? I have assumed so but not verified.
And when the machines were scrubbed (adjudication logs deleted in Antrim county), why weren't these logs also scrubbed?
On around Jan 19th Jovan Pulitzer made available a PDF of a slide presentation of the fraud. (It's here on FR somewhere and the link lead me to MeWe.) On MeWe he had a dozen animations of IP traffic among dominion systems and various foreign end points (Canada, Australia, England, Iran, Eastern Europe, China). I had assumed this source of these up traces was explained in the brief, but I did not complete the review of the brief. Too many linux projects.