Posted on 02/08/2021 2:44:33 PM PST by SeekAndFind
For me, the video came across as more honest and convincing because it WASN’T “professionally” done. One reason we love Trump is because he isn’t smoooth and slick.
The weakest part of the vid is Mike himself - an awful interviewer, over using the single word “wow” constantly.
However, the evidence shone thru the poor interviewer skills - Mike is an entrepreneur, not an interviewer.
Fanning was the best.
Now, I’d expect a followup - release Fanning’s data, PDF form , for all to see for themselves. And yes, explain further - how was this information gathered (I presume by NSA, sniffing the Leonardi and other satellites, etc).
1:36:19 to 1:49:40 MARY FANNING—This portion of the video should have been dynamite. But instead of properly and concisely presenting the evidence, Mike Lindell and Mary Fanning miss the boat. We see glimpses of a spreadsheet that, we are told, are foreign intrusions into 2995 counties before, during and after November 3, 2020. I believe it. The data we can see does show China as the big culprit. But we only see a fraction of the take and at no time are we informed how this information in Mary Fanning’s hands was collected and stored. I had hoped that Mary would have taken some steps to explain how she and her groups got their hands on this potentially bombshell data.
What I found equally frustrating is Fanning’s lack of curiosity or effort in sorting the data by State and County. This could have been a stunning follow up to the DePerno interview. DePerno’s evidence showing there was a massive movement of improperly counted votes away from Trump going to Biden in Antrim County could have been corroborated by Fanning. Sadly, that opportunity is ignored in this video. Just a passing reference to Antrim.
----------------
It is Texas Hold'em. Now, is not the time to reveal all of the cards in the hand.
Who the heck is Larry Johnson and why should I care what he thinks?
Mike apparently gets on his nerves but at least Mike put his money where his mouth is and Mike is willing to take the tremendous amount of criticism and numerous boycotts of his business.
What’s Larry done to expose election fraud?
Another armchair quarterback. Let’s see you do better.
Has anyone watched the video at the end of the article?
The only problem I had with the video was Lindell’s talking over the interviewees. (Must have taken lessons from Hannity!) All in all, the presentation should, SHOULD, make federal law enforcement to look at the fraudulent election evidence. That said, Lindell is a treasure!
I have to say, when I heard it was a 3 hour presentation, I was turned off and haven’t watched it. I would like to see the evidence presented in a concise form and don’t want to hear a lecture. Just the facts and evidence.
Election Fraud - bump for later....
Wouldn’t matter what was IN the video or how long, people like you won’t believe the evidence because you SUFFER from normalcy bias and a closed mind. The video is filled with EVIDENCE ... but evidence is beyond your comprehension level. Enjoy the death of Freedom, you’ve help to earn it for America.
I had hoped that Mary would have taken some steps to explain how she and her groups got their hands on this potentially bombshell data.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Bingo... and this is when it starts to smell a lot like the entire Scytl and ‘Italy Did It’ thing (and that looked like a bunch of disinformation planted by Dem-Rats to make Trump supporters chase after it and look foolish.) The problem that I had with all the animations in the last 15 minutes of these supposed communications and vote changing going on from overseas is that this all looked to be just too convenient. It’s one thing for somebody to randomly hack in from overseas (or from just down the street) but it’s a totally different thing so that all these battleground states end up ‘going to Bye-Done by a razor’s edge’. That sort of end result could only come from a single organizing point.
That fraud went on and that the Dem-Rats successfully executed a coup is not in question... they did. But I suspect that they did with the tried and true methods they’ve been using for years along with the new wrinkle of ‘mail in ballots’ on steroid as seized as a side benefit (and objective) of perpetuating and prolonging WuFlu. Oh and the other thing they did was a massive amount of ballot ‘adjudication’ where good ballots cast for PDJT were turned into ones for Bye-Done.
That’s a hell of a leap for a chiding. I have seen a lot of evidence of fraud I don’t need Mike, or you, to lecture me on it.
RE: Who the heck is Larry Johnson and why should I care what he thinks?
Here’s a background of the author of this review:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Larry_C._Johnson
He’s a regular contributor to the Gateway Pundit website.
Electronic voting machine vote shaving and changes at both the local and centralized tabulation level have been going on for decades now as well. Bev Harris did the pioneering work on it and it has been covered on 60 Minutes and similar shows over the years.
The Dems clearly took an “all of the above” approach to getting the swing states swung.
But I agree there appear to have been some infiltrators and hangers on trying to poison the information on it, as well as the usual suspects closer to the president trying to keep legit challenges underfunded and squelched.
Funny, all these critics, yet no one else stepped to the plate and forked over their own money to codify this theft.
Let’s other step up and do a better job — at their own expense.
As is, "Absolute Proof" is a noble effort, but it will not change many minds. That is the standard here -- does it change minds?
The original plan was to have the evidence Mike presented vetted in multiple courts as part of Sidney Powell’s and Lin Wood’s lawsuits. This was supposed to have been done before the electors were certified so we would end up with an illegitimate regime in power.
For some reason this never happened and everything got kicked up to the SCOTUS. They will probably agree with Mike that that the evidence of fraud is quite good but it should have been brought up when we could do something about it and not disenfranchise all those fictional Biden voters.
Maybe if Mike had hired Jonathan Turley or Alan Dershowitz to do the gig it might have worked better except they were running the other way the last time I looked.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.