Posted on 02/08/2021 2:44:33 PM PST by SeekAndFind
Waiting for Larry Johnson’s video. I know it will be perfect.
Mike may be the last hope of someone to try a lawsuit with Dominion et al.. So far anyone sued has backed off quick. If no one stands up to the legal threat they win.
HOCKEYPUCK! It was a well done video and warranting a full investigation of the fraud. How much evidence does one need when a crime is so blatantly obvious. This reminds me of the movie “ A GUIDE FOR THE MARRIED MAN “ where Joey Bishop is caught in bed with this gal by his wife and he gets up and gets dressed and keeps saying “ what woman “, “ where “, “ I don’t see any woman “.
Yes. Mike Lindell’s video focuses much more on the detail of voting machines and servers.
I have not seen anyone prove that the IP addresses shown by Mary Fanning are incorrect. An explanation of how this data was collected could add to its veracity.
It is hard for people with closed minds, from normalxy bias or rejection bias, to learn truth because they presume they already know and won’t be bothered.
No, you show you have seen a lot and rejected it. You are a fraud.
RE: An explanation of how this data was collected could add to its veracity.
Maybe Mike Lindell can do and update on his movie with all these constructive inputs taken into account. I for one am curious as to how her team was able to gather the IP and MAC Addreses.
Also, an introduction to Mary Fanning’s background would be helpful.
RE: I have seen a lot of evidence of fraud
Can you share with us examples of such evidence that you found convincing?
Yeah, I’m saying worse than that. This is an act of war.
.
It seems as though Dr. Shiva’s analysis was similar to what forensic accountants do. He worked with publicly available evidence and revealed the odds of Biden winning being astronomically small. These types of analyses are allowed as supporting evidence in court.
If he curious of the ratings. Many here liked it but thought it was too long. I’m going to watch it eventually when I can spare the time.
Come on dude. Is this video the Bible of election fraud? Why are you being a jerk because this person got information by reading instead of having it regurgitated like you did? Mike probably did the best he could. But there is a slew of information out there without having it spoon fed.
Where did I say I rejected it? I saw suitcases of ballots coming out from under tables when counting was supposedly done for the night. I heard of vans full of ballots showing up after the deadline for absentee ballots and after the counting rooms were closed for the night. I saw vote counts change in real time on the TV screen. I saw votes flip. I saw mathematical models showing the improbability of such late breaking onslaught of ballots for Biden, in areas which have proportionally higher GOP registrations Biden got proportionally higher votes which not only defies logic but suggests that the machines were using algorithms to flip votes based on registration data for the precincts. I have heard reports of USB drives being used/lost/re-used. I have heard reports that the data was sent overseas before being tabulated and returned to registrars. And I’ve seen evidence of invalid ballots. I believe there was widespread fraud. I want to see it all in one place, as concisely as possible.
Besides which your disagreement shouldn’t be with me. If there is ever to be any traction among the skeptics, it has to be shown to them in a simple fashion. They are the ones you have beef with. They will never listen to Mike, nor watch 3 hours of him presenting. It should be, as I said, just the facts and evidence.
Thanks, bfl.
See my post above. The most convincing evidence I saw, other than the suitcases being pulled out from under the tables when the counting room was supposed to be stopped for the night (and they covered the glass) was a video done by 3 professors of statistics, iirc from MIT.
They said they saw this pattern occur in scores of counties across the country, but presented with about 6 examples, two of which I believe were in Michigan. They showed that the higher the GOP registration in a particular precinct, the greater the votes broke for Biden. They plotted it out with graphs. So for example, if a precinct had 25% higher GOP registration, it had something in the area of 20% MORE votes for Biden than for Trump. Which totally defies logic. And if this happened in one precinct it could be an aberration but they showed it occurring in every precinct in Detroit metro area - the graph had 100s of little dots showing the deviation from the mean. That’s just not statistically possible at all for the man who got the 2nd highest vote count in American history (probably the 1st highest vote if not for the fraud). And each precinct, almost exactly the same ratio relative to registration numbers. Strong evidence that the tabulation machines were flipping or stripping votes according to an algorithm.
I’ll have to search for the video. That video alone was about 1 hour long but it was a livestream, unedited.
The only MIT professor I know who showed the statistical impossibility of Biden’s victory is the one from Prof. Shiva Ayadurrai.
Here is his video:
https://www.citizensjournal.us/anatomy-of-an-election-steal/
Is the video in this website the one you are referring to?
Here is the URL of the video from the MIT professor:
I’m surprised YouTube has not blocked it yet.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.