Skip to comments.Sidney Powell Asks Supreme Court to Dismiss Her Case from Georgia
Posted on 01/19/2021 12:52:00 PM PST by White Lives Matter
Today attorney Sidney Powell asked the US Supreme Court to dismiss her challenge to the presidential election results in Georgia.
The Washington Examiner reported:
With just hours to go before President-elect Joe Biden’s inauguration, Trump ally Sidney Powell dropped her remaining challenges to the presidential election results in Georgia.
Of course Powell knows that there was broad voter fraud in the state of Georgia which ended up stealing the election for Joe Biden in that state. It is unknown why she is asking to dismiss this case.
Powell’s requested dismissal of her case in Georgia is puzzling. Has the Trump team given up or is there some other reason Powell requested the case be dismissed?
(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...
She cut a deal with someone they all do
Reverse psychology. Now they’ll pay attention.
The check cleared..........................................................
If I recall, Sidney Powell had a list of lawyers on the application. Among them was I believe Lin Wood.
As the case is likely moot per any review by the Supreme Court which hid under their desks through the entirety of Election Theft 2020, not a surprise.
Wood is so toxic, he’s bringing down everyone around him. It’s terrible.
There are a lot of checks being cleared these days.
It’s moot now. Why bother spending time and money?
For those inquiring about us dropping our lawsuit in Georgia, the delay by the Supreme Court in addressing the issues we raised rendered the issues moot on behalf of the specific clients we represented. We are by no means finished with what needs to be done to get to the bottom of this fraudulent election. Sidney
There is only one outcome in an election now. We've become like China.
What happened to kraken, we got them, stop the steal etc etc etc?
Almost seems like fair elections are over in the US
Sidney Powell knows the fix is in at SCOTUS. Why even give them the opportunity to “rule” on a case when she knows that they would only give credibility to a blatantly stolen election by rejecting the evidence. They would probably reject the case outright, anyway.
Thanks for the link!
No! No! Wood speaks truth to power!
He just hasn’t disclosed any of the info he claims he has, or that he has seen.
Still waiting. Any day?
Ahh, yes they are!
Expected - she accomplished her goal, which was to DISTRACT the courts from legitimate complaints, so as to assure that everything got thrown out.
There’s your answer!
There never was a “Kraken”. It was a kitten.
Does she still stand behind those accusations?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.