Posted on 12/05/2020 10:09:42 AM PST by ebb tide
The vaccine contains a spike protein (see image) called syncytin-1, vital for the formation of human placenta in women. If the vaccine works so that we form an immune response AGAINST the spike protein, we are also training the female body to attack syncytin-1, which could lead to infertility in women of an unspecified duration.
On the one hand, the petitioners demand that, due to the known lack of accuracy of the PCR test in a serious study, a so-called Sanger sequencing must be used. This is the only way to make reliable statements on the effectiveness of a vaccine against Covid-19. On the basis of the many different PCR tests of highly varying quality, neither the risk of disease nor a possible vaccine benefit can be determined with the necessary certainty, which is why testing the vaccine on humans is unethical per se.
Furthermore, they demand that it must be excluded, e.g. by means of animal experiments, that risks already known from previous studies, which partly originate from the nature of the corona viruses, can be realized. The concerns are directed in particular to the following points:
CALL FOR HELP: Dr. Wodarg and Dr. Yeadon ask as many EU citizens as possible to co-sign their petition by sending the e-mail prepared here to the EMA.
Not part of the original article but a comment….
From:http://tapnewswire.com/2020/12/a-quick-glance-at-the-small-print-spells-danger/
*...is NOT medicine...”
Research the Vatican’s findings on anti- sterilization being used in Africa. They had the proof, caught the Gates vacine red handed- I will not spoon feed you. Documented....vacine pulled.
Thalidomide was first developed and distributed in Germany
Go to hell
We know you love your naturopathic medicine
You are a quack through and through
And yes as a matter of fact I and my brethren are subject matter experts on disease processes, treatment of disease, pharmacology and physiology.
And that’s Doctor to you.
Antoninus wrote: “Wow. Re-read what you just posted. Becomes across as you saying “So what if it makes people sterile.””
Re-read what I posted. Even if, and that’s a typical anti-vaccer big if, by definition, if it will have no effect on women past the child-bearing age or men.
Jan_Sobieski wrote: “Did you read the research paper? Do you know anything about the Gates’ and the NWO depopulation agenda?”
Yes, I read the research paper. Typical anti-vaccer hyperbolic propaganda.
The SARS-1 (COVID-19 is SARS-2) vaccine under Obama also had to be immediately pulled as it was killing and maiming people.
Thoughts? Have you heard of this? Would you as a doc approach this vaccine with caution?
Thank you to everyone who called out this story for the nonsense that it is.
Really people. Stop being freaking MORONS. Don’t believe this stupid crap. It’s clear nonsense.
I fully respect the fact that people’s vaccination decisions are personal. An old man has a different risk/benefit ratio than a child has.A vaccine which enables me to ignore Covid completely would be wonderful. Even if it killed me when I was 100.
That same vaccine basically does bupkis for a child - and cuts his life short.
Even if this claim is true, the vaccine which protects seniors only still prevents nearly all Covid deaths - including those in which seniors infect younger people.. Seems like Regeneron would take care of the rest . . . young/middle aged from infecting the old.
Seriously, Snopes? Of course they do!
The professional opinion you get today, from I am assuming your medical provider, will be based on the same information we are now reading.
In my family I have an emergency room doctor, a thoracic surgeon and a brother-in-law oncologist who sadly passed away 6 weeks ago.
While I trust their opinions on medical issues explicitly, they are medical professionals who believe in vaccines because of what the medical journals and their pharmaceutical providers tell them. But it doesn't translate to them being right all the time.
This is a new vaccine that no physician has any knowledge of other than what Pharma is telling our government so I would not rely on your expert's professional opinion.
The question you need to ask yourself is whether or not you are in a risk group with underlying medical conditions. If the answer is no, I would not even consider taking the new vaccine........
But it's up to you.....
Good luck brother.....
This is anti-vax crazy talk. NO THANK YOU
Oh no - if you read it on the internet, it has to be true. It fits the narrative some want to believe.
“Assuming this to be true, then there is no reason to preclude vaccinating males or women of an infertile condition.”
How many people do you reckon that would be? Even old men are known to father children with some frequency (e.g., Pablo Picasso).
Yes it was.
OK, “doc”. Funny how many people here on FR have so little trust in vax. Love it! I remember interviewing my child’s pediatrician before birth. That genius had no clue which form of vitamin K was injected in the hospital. And he’s probably one of the more reasonable and competent pediatricians that I have met.
BTW, I work in the oil industry, not health care, with illustrates your skills at discernment and diagnosis? Lol.
Well looky here, the quack UK govt has some warnings:
“Really people. Stop being freaking MORONS. Don’t believe this stupid crap. It’s clear nonsense.”
Sounds convincing.
You go first. I’ll wait a century or two.
Probably is false, but don’t trust Snopes with anything.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.