“Assuming this to be true, then there is no reason to preclude vaccinating males or women of an infertile condition.”
How many people do you reckon that would be? Even old men are known to father children with some frequency (e.g., Pablo Picasso).
dsc wrote: “How many people do you reckon that would be? Even old men are known to father children with some frequency (e.g., Pablo Picasso).”
You really should read the article. Quoting the first paragraph: “The vaccine contains a spike protein (see image) called syncytin-1, vital for the formation of human placenta in women. If the vaccine works so that we form an immune response AGAINST the spike protein, we are also training the female body to attack syncytin-1, which could lead to infertility in women of an unspecified duration.”
I wasn’t aware that Picasso ever formed a placenta.
Just another example of how the anti-vaccers can go off on a hyperbolic trajectory.
dsc wrote: “How many people do you reckon that would be? Even old men are known to father children with some frequency (e.g., Pablo Picasso).”
You really should read the article. Quoting the first paragraph: “The vaccine contains a spike protein (see image) called syncytin-1, vital for the formation of human placenta in women. If the vaccine works so that we form an immune response AGAINST the spike protein, we are also training the female body to attack syncytin-1, which could lead to infertility in women of an unspecified duration.”
I wasn’t aware that Picasso ever formed a placenta.
Just another example of how the anti-vaccers can go off on a hyperbolic trajectory.