Posted on 11/23/2020 8:26:44 AM PST by SeekAndFind
Sorry for using the word, “algorithm.” I suspect most of you reading this struggled thru basic algebra in high school and did not deign to venture into the world of calculus and other advanced mathematics. The explanation is simple. A calculation built into the computer software was executed to produce numbers that, if unexamined, appear to secure a victory for Biden. The numbers do not lie. Votes were manufactured for Joe Biden. The citizens of Pennsylvania voted overwhelmingly for Donald Trump. Joe Biden’s folks tried to steal it.
A fellow by the name of Edward Solomon has done yeoman’s work in digging into the Pennsylvania voting data and showing conclusively, in my view, how the Democrats, with the help of Dominion, rigged the vote. What was done in Pennsylvania, specifically Philadelphia, reveals how the Dominion software magically created votes for Joe Biden to swamp the actual number of votes Donald Trump was ringing up.
We shared this video a couple days ago. The video lasts about 40 minutes. It is worth your time. Here is our first post with the video.
But let me give you the Reader’s Digest version. When the early vote numbers rolled in, it was clear that Donald Trump was on his way to a major win. The task for Dominion was to manufacture votes for Biden without making it obvious. They tried, but failed.
Mr. Solomon takes the raw vote data that was being streamed by the NY Times and downloaded it into a spreadsheet. That data allows him to look at vote totals by precinct and how they changed over time. He found that a variety of ratios were used in different sets of precincts. For example, his Exhibit 1 shows a group of precincts where the votes were being recorded at the following ratio–1 vote for Trump and 48 for Biden.
The diabolical system employed by Dominion started with needing to generate a total vote total for Joe Biden. Rather than employ a single computer calculation, Dominion used a number of algorithms. Mr. Solomon identifies at least 9 different calculations used to create these votes.
Exhibit 1 Ratio of 1 to 48
Exhibit 2 Ratio of 1 to 18
Exhibit 3 Ratio of 4 to 65
Exhibit 4 Ratio of 3 to 48
Exhibit 5 Ratio 4 to 63
Exhibit 6 Ratio of 5 to 31
Exhibit 7 Ratio of 1 to 5
Exhibit 8 Ratio of 1 to 4
Exhibit 9 Ration of 1 to 6
The data examined by Mr. Solomon is only one part of the proof of the voter fraud. Data from other parts of Pennsylvania will need to be examined to determine if there is a similar pattern or if the data from Philadelphia and Pittsburgh are outliers.
The Gateway Pundit has also posted several reports on the election fraud in Pennsylvania.
And it is odd that Dominion refused to testify under oath in front of a Pennsylvania House committee.
The next evidentiary question to be asked, and answered, is whether there are actually ballots that back up the numbers reported on the computer. If there are ballots for Biden but no ballots for Trump, that is conclusive evidence of the fraud.
There are multiple sworn affidavits from witnesses of truck loads of ballots being off-loaded at the center in Philadelphia. Those ballots must be examined. If the ballots only show Joe Biden’s name and there are no ballots matching the numbers reported for Trump, that means one thing. Fraud.
This needs to be presented in court. But will a court look at it?
It now makes sense as to how some of the local elected officials can be reelected for decades when absolutely nobody like them or votes for them.
Great, if they only can now have some impartial international panel of cyber-security experts and renowned mathematicians back this up. Credibility is everything in both a court of law and in the court of public opinion.
Will the courts look at this. So many people knew about this. And they are just pushing it through. What will be the fall out.
The Trump legal team is not claiming any of this stuff in court filings because the courts can never rule on this stuff in time.
The claims from the lawyers focus on Equal Protection. That’s actually a much more powerful argument. Certain counties in the relevant states followed a different ballot acceptance/counting procedure than other counties.
This is exactly equivalent to what happened in 2000 when Gore’s team asked for a different chad puncture counting standard in Palm Beach, Broward and Miami Dade counties than was used elsewhere. The Bush team pointed at a violation of Equal Protection and the USSC found in their favor, and did so by more votes than just the conservative/liberal justice ratio. It was powerful stuff and the court had no doubt about it.
This will happen again. It is a precedent. Stare decisis. Georgia’s Fulton County had different signature verification standards than other counties. The only problem is the remedy requested is much more severe than in year 2000 Florida. Erasing all of Atlanta’s votes is a real problem compared to simply not allowing an additional few thousand votes from Broward county.
And that's precisely why NO court will touch equal protection or any of the other more esoteric points being argued.
IMHO, the ONLY path to victory is to prove the Dominion fraud. That's impossible to ignore. Equal protection, "mean D guy that wouldn't let our poll watchers in" or anything else Rudy and Jenna are arguing are unlikely to go anywhere - for exactly the reason you mentioned. No court is going to "disenfranchise" hundreds of thousands or millions of voters to fix an issue with a comparably small number of voters. Never gonna happen.
It’s not that I don’t believe this, it’s just that I’m not sure why hand recounts don’t find it. HAND recounts.
Software gobbledygook will never persuade judges with zero software background.
Probably the way to do it is to force Atlanta and other cities to rescreen envelopes. However many envelopes are found to be bogus, extract random ballots adding to that count.
The year 2000 court had the option to allow other counties to use the new counting standard. Time was pressing so they “disenfranchised” several thousand votes from South Florida, instead.
It’s not impossible. It’s just a steeper hill to climb than 2000. It really does come down to the Never Trump SoS in Georgia who let Atlanta accept any piece of paper that arrived with zero verify
Because the Georgia hand recounts were simply RECOUNTING the illegal ballots together with the valid ones. There needs to first be an AUDIT before a recount. If you’re simply including the illegal ones in the recounts, you won’t be getting a different result from the original one.
The theory is Hand Recounts are not counting original ballots. Machines for In Person voting . . . where the voter touches a touchscreen . . . they print out a ballot. Voter reviews for accuracy and turns it in. (Of course it is unfolded and perfectly printed, it came from machine). The issue is that VBM ballots also pass through a machine and it has been suggested they get a newly printed ballot, too from the machine (this protects the original from repeated handling).
So . . . that’s how a hand recount could fail. Original ballots put into a machine, which prints out a copy of the ballot . . . it may be only printing out some of them.
Then when you could those printed out, by hand, it will match the number you get running those ballots that are re-fed.
“It’s not that I don’t believe this, it’s just that I’m not sure why hand recounts don’t find it. HAND recounts.”
I honestly believe, the stopping of the counting overnight, was for the dems to provide cover for the algorithm that was running. Trumps numbers were simply too much, and if the algorithm was running they may not have had enough ballots to cover what the algorithm recorded.
I think they were set for a normal type election, i.e. had enough fraud ballots to cover. But Trumps vote was historic, thus their algorithm was churning out a ton of Biden votes that needed to be covered in case of a recount.
The question is, did they stuff the ballot box enough to cover in every location? Maybe, but it should be found through a real audit. If they had to make thousands of ballots in a short time period, we should be able to see those. They are certainly there in the count, huge dumps for basically biden only.
You can expand the video window to actually see the spreadsheet.
Okay, that makes sense. Thank you!
You are very welcome, now let us all hope that the fingerprint of fraud can be identified and shown in court.
Have a wonderful Thanksgiving.
Why are ratios involved at all? Why not a tabulation, precinct by precinct, of actual votes for each candidate.
Ratios can be derived from vote totals but why derive vote totals from ratios? Makes no sense to me.
Also, why are votes (or ratios ???) transferred from one precinct to another.
Without understanding those things I can’t understand the guy’s analysis.
Bttt.
5.56mm
p
Great idea for a panel of experts, because a Judge will not have a clue. This is the issue. Decoding and exposing the fraud so any layman or Judge or sane person can understand how the election was turned on a seeming biblical scale.
” No court is going to “disenfranchise” hundreds of thousands or millions of voters to fix an issue with a comparably small number of voters.”
Wouldn’t NOT looking at it disenfranchise 70 million or more voters?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.