Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pollution? Fukushima radiation? Algae bloom? Just 2 weeks after the first one, another mass die-off is discovered in Kamchatka and scares scientists worldwide
ss ^ | 10/15/20 | ss

Posted on 10/15/2020 10:37:26 AM PDT by Roman_War_Criminal

Unexplained deaths of sea life are continuing to cause anxiety in Russia’s Far East.

On Tuesday, fish, octopuses and crabs were filmed washed ashore hundreds of kilometers away from the spot where the alarm was first raised.

A video of the ecological disaster near Ozernovskiy village on Kamchatka’s western coast shows dead marine creatures scattered along a 50-meter-wide area of the beach.

The peninsula, some 7,000km east of Moscow, is home to one of the earth’s most pristine environments.

The footage is similar to clips that came from Avacha Bay on the opposite eastern coast in late September, when numerous marine life washed ashore. By land, the distance between Ozernovskiy and Avacha Bay is around 250 kilometers.

Scientists have flown to the site by helicopter to take samples from the water, and remove soil and animal carcasses for analysis, local authorities said. The Prosecutor’s Office and environmental watchdog Rosprirodnadzor are also sending their people to Ozernovskiy.

The fact that the beaches near Ozernovskiy are clean, according to witnesses, and because of the large distance between the two contamination spots, it is unlikely that the “local man-made facility near Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky” is to blame for the disaster, he pointed out.

The governor was presumably referring to the Kozelsk chemical landfill, which stands on the river flowing into Avacha Bay. A possible leak from the landfill has been considered among the potential reasons for the death of 95 percent of sea life in the area. It’s believed that it’ll take the fauna up to 15 years to fully recover.

Water samples taken from Avacha Bay after the disaster showed that the concentration of phosphates, iron, phenols and ammonium were seven times higher than normal. But a specific agent that caused the contamination couldn’t be established.

Russia’s Investigative committee has launched a criminal probe into the incident.

According to one Russian scientist, this could be caused by a toxic algae bloom:

The mass death of sea creatures in Russia’s Kamchatka region was caused by toxins from microalgae rather than man-made pollution, a senior Russian scientist said on Monday, citing preliminary findings of an investigation.

Locals on the volcanic peninsula in the Pacific raised the alarm in September as surfers experienced stinging eyes and sea creatures, including octopuses, seals and sea urchins, were found dead on the shore. A Greenpeace handout photo shows the water near the Khalaktyr beach on the Kamchatka peninsula

Conservation activists had raised concern that the source of the pollution could be a Soviet era storage ground for poisonous chemicals on Kamchatka that might have seeped out into the sea.

“I am sure that we are facing a large-scale phenomenon, but not an uncommon one for Kamchatka, called harmful blooming algae,” the vice president of Russia’s Academy of Sciences, Andrei Adrianov, told journalists Monday.

He said that water samples showed a “high concentration only of Gymnodinium (microalgae)”, which produces “toxins that affect invertebrates”.

Adrianov added that the same toxins could have also caused the symptoms experienced by divers and surfers.

Last week, scientists said the pollution had formed a 40-kilometre-long (25-mile) slick which has been moving south towards Japan and the disputed Kuril islands.

Activists of Russia’s Greenpeace branch have voiced concern that the “situation is not improving” and dead animals continue washing up on beaches.

Adrianov, on the other hand, said “nature is regenerating itself and very quickly”.

Earlier probe results presented by regional authorities said the local bays showed above-permitted levels of phenol and petroleum products. Locals have been warned to avoid the beaches.

Coming just months after a massive oil leak in Siberia, the latest incident sparked a public outcry with a petition calling for an “open investigation” into the events so far garnering over 175,000 signatures.

Notably, while human negligence seems to have been involved in that incident, there was also speculation that permafrost melt could also be partly to blame.

Meanwhile, Russian investigators have launched a criminal probe over the illegal handling of dangerous substances and “pollution of the marine environment”.


TOPICS: Outdoors; Pets/Animals; Science; Weather
KEYWORDS: kamchatka; massdieoff; pacificocean; seacreatures
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-28 last
To: dangus

A whole 150 feet....MASS dieout?


21 posted on 10/15/2020 11:46:06 AM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: dangus

Climate change — that’s all.


22 posted on 10/15/2020 12:18:48 PM PDT by 353FMG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: dangus

Looks like good surfing.


23 posted on 10/15/2020 12:24:11 PM PDT by EQAndyBuzz (Cloward-Piven is finally upon us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: diatomite

>> If local fishermen dumped to kill the starfish, they sure killed a lot of molluscs at the same time. <<

The one still on FR looks like a lot of molluscs (and stones), but the first video looks like about 60% starfish, 20% eels or stag coral or some combination, and 20% molluscs. Very few fish, which is what I’ve always seen washed up from a die-off. Molluscs usually don’t wash up after a kill: they secrete nets of filaments which anchor themselves to rocks; what molluscs there are probably what were already on the littoral rocks.

Not that I’ve ever seen coral wash up in large amounts either; if it IS coral, it got caught up with the starfish kill.


24 posted on 10/15/2020 2:20:27 PM PDT by dangus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: dangus

... of course, this is all in arctic Russia, so who knows, maybe it’s normal for fishkills to be mostly eels.


25 posted on 10/15/2020 2:21:32 PM PDT by dangus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Roman_War_Criminal

So run a geiger counter over them. That would prove radiation.

And why not do all the testing before running a panic story?


26 posted on 10/15/2020 2:23:37 PM PDT by lurk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: dangus

The FR picture was all that I looked at. On second thought, some of those molluscs might have been brachiopods.

The coral should have been well attached and not easily washed up. More so than any other invertebrate phyla.


27 posted on 10/15/2020 2:59:19 PM PDT by diatomite (Soros delenda est and his flying monkeys too.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: diatomite

>> The coral should have been well attached and not easily washed up. More so than any other invertebrate phyla. <<

Yeah, the abundance of starfish, clams, mussels and what may be coral makes me think someone drudged up this junk. Also, the extremely concentrated, localized nature of it. But like I said, it’s Pacific Russia. Never been there.


28 posted on 10/15/2020 7:00:12 PM PDT by dangus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-28 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson