Posted on 05/03/2020 4:52:03 AM PDT by grey_whiskers
The Army Times appointed as its top editor a 28-year-old feminist from Brooklyn who has repeatedly tweeted that she hates President Donald Trump and worked as a spokeswoman for a New York councilman who describes himself as a “moderate Democrat.”
After interning for several Democrats, graduating Hofstra University in 2014, and contemplating art school, Sarah Sicard wrote for a marijuana publication called the “Bluntness,” served as communications director for a New York city council member, and worked in corporate PR, according to her resume and online bios.
(Excerpt) Read more at dailycaller.com ...
Seriously, we need to fumigate ALL institutions against the Sore-Ass / Gates / SJW virus.
*PING*
Is this from Babylon Bee?
www.militarytimes.com › author › sarah-sicard
Sarah Sicard is the editor of Army Times. She has previously written for National Defense Magazine, Task & Purpose, Defense News and has other work featured in Fast Company, Business Insider and AdWeek.
https://taskandpurpose.com/author/sarahsicard
They should be ashamed to have hired her.
Nothing new. For years the Military Times folks had more sodomites among their writers than people who’d served in uniform.
The Army Times has been a far-left outfit for years.
Aren’t they owned by Gannett? So yes.
“Nothing new. For years the Military Times folks had more sodomites among their writers than people who’d served in uniform.”
Yes, since Trump was elected President the Army Times has definitely gone Leftist Democrat.
The various Times - Army, Navy, Air Force, etc., are not military publications.
The Military Times is a commercial business that is mostly populated with liberals - management, editorial, and reporters.
For reporters, it is a stepping stone to the big time liberal papers, especially the Washington Post.
It is decidedly liberal in its coverage of military affairs. It would never hire in today,s coverage a Bill Mauldin or Ernie Pyle.
Soros places another operative.
So why put up with that?
The next bunch of "journalists" were in the mind set of being main stream journalists...what ever the hell that is, and spent their time roaming the halls of the Pentagon, attempting to sniff out alleged corruption, chasing that ever-elusive Pulitzer, and sucking up the Hollywood set, begging to be "Technical Advisors" for all the crap movies that the Pentagon was overseeing.
Then came the "combat corespondents"...the Jake Tappers of the war reporters, so full of themselves that even when they did find a good story, they mucked it up with the crybaby crap to the point that readers usually ended up diabetic.
That bunch did little other than to piss off every commander in the field with their total disregard for SIGINT, publishing some of the most outrageous and embellished crap that put the National Enquirer to shame.
Now, they are just sad caricatures of NY Times wannabes.
The don't find news, they make it up and every damned one of them is eat up with SJW aspirations and anti-republicanism and liberalism.
I spent several years chasing the likes of those assholes off of Fort Hood, especially during the runup to Desert Storm.
The stories I could tell.
The whole damned bunch need to go back to publishing promotion lists and PX open/close times.
That's about the only damned thing that they ever did well at...and screwed it up half the time.
WHO HIRED HER??? That’s the person that should be fired also!
WIKI: Founded in 1940, Army Times was purchased by the Gannett Company in August 1997. The company’s Military Times group publishes four bimonthly newspapers aimed at current and former U.S. military personnel: Army Times (founded 1940), Navy Times (founded 1951), Air Force Times (founded 1947), and Marine Corps Times. It also publishes Defense News (founded 1986), C4ISRNET and Federal Times. As part of a spinoff...in 2015, Gannett spun off these properties to Tegna. In March 2016, Tegna sold Sightline Media Group to Regent, a Los Angeles-based private equity firm controlled by investor Michael Reinstein.
In 2011, hackers breached a Sightline database of subscribers, obtaining their names, passwords, email addresses, duty status, paygrade, and branch of service.[2]
This fits...
a couple of years ago there was an article in this mag about the military rape folks joining with the #MeToo idiots...
I’ll stick with Stars and Stripes.
A lot of the military is on team blue’s side.
Those who idolize the armed forces need to realize a decent portion view us as the real enemy
I don't think any of them are realistic - except for a partially successful military coup that succeeds in breaking the chain of command but leaves the President or Vice President alive and at liberty, protected by loyal elements of the military.
The constant posting here of how much "the military" supports Trump is misinformed. Yes, he has support in the military. He also has enemies.
Some of those enemies control large bodies of troops.
One Trident sub can ruin a Democrat would-be dictator’s whole day.
What happens if a sub nukes a dozen blue cities?
There goes the population advantage of the Dems.
And food production, and much of the red voters, being widely dispersed, are not immediately effected.
Remember, it was DEMOCRAT Eric Swallows-well who said he’d nuke Red State voters.
As a candidate.
In public.
He wasn’t merely considering hypotheticals in an internet discussion.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.