Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Opening Argument – Patrick Philbin Explains an Unconstitutional Origin to The House Impeachment, And Why It Matters…
CONSERVATIVE TREEHOUSE ^ | 1/25/2020 | SUNDANCE

Posted on 01/25/2020 10:12:39 PM PST by bitt

Several days ago we anticipated a potentially important point we hoped would start the impeachment defense for President Donald Trump. Today, attorney Patrick Philbin delivered. The issue is a critical constitutional component that needed emphasis, and it is good to see pundits finally starting to realize the significance.

White House Counsel Patrick Philbin explains why House subpoenas were illegitimate: the subpoena power was never authorized; the initiating subpoena power was never voted on.

Additionally, and specifically by design, absent a penalty for non-compliance, which factually makes a subpoena a ‘subpoena’, the Executive Branch had no constitutional pathway or process to engage an appellate review by federal courts. Make no mistake, this was a pre-planned purposeful trick within the Pelosi, Schiff and Lawfare road-map.

The House motive here, the forethought within their design, is very important now because it explains why they are vociferously demanding witnesses in the Senate. The House plan was to work around the ability of the executive branch to go to court. The managers are now attempting to execute that plan, along with a manufactured political talking point, in the Senate trial.

The House intended for this to unfold exactly as it is happening.

(Excerpt) Read more at theconservativetreehouse.com ...


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: adamschiff; alexandervindman; botox; burisma; california; declassification; ericciaramella; fbi; fisa; impeachment; impeachmenttrial; jerroldnadler; jerrynadler; michaelpurpura; nadler; nancypelosi; newyork; nlz; patcipollone; patrickphilbin; philbin; sanfrancisco; sanfrannan; scaredschiffless; schiffforbrains; stalinistshowtrial; subpoena; subpoenas; ukraine; witnesses
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-32 last
To: vrtom

Assuming permission, I’m gonna repeat your post :^)
______________________
“So, the Executive branch can now prosecute the House for Abuse of Power (for trying to impeach without authority), and Obstruction of Administration (for wasting so much time, thus interfering with President’s efforts).”


21 posted on 01/26/2020 2:35:10 AM PST by gasport (The dung beetle should be the symbol of the Democrat Party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: bitt

bmp


22 posted on 01/26/2020 2:57:21 AM PST by gattaca ("Government's first duty is to protect the people, not run their lives." Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child

Here’s my dumb question: If Pelosi had the votes to impeach President Trump, why didn’t she have them vote to authorize the impeachment inquiry?
**********************************************************************************
The house had already voted (3 times IIRC) DJT inauguration, on impeachment. It was rejected 3 times already. Nazi Nancy most likely did not have the votes, and did not want to risk another rejection—needed to move the plan along.

Through the fake impeachment process, they thought they could drum up sufficient support to pressure enough people to change their vote.


23 posted on 01/26/2020 2:59:49 AM PST by greeneyes ( Moderation In Pursuit of Justice is NO Virtue--LET FREEDOM RING)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: greeneyes
The House already voted 4 times on impeachment.....starting when Donald came down the Trump Tower escalator with Melania.....(smirk).
It was rejected 3 times by the time Donald got down to business in the Oval Office and began undoing the Obama (gag) legacy.
The dumb Democraps figured support would skyrocket w/ the recent blather-fest to pressure enough people to change their vote.

The dumbo plan was to peel off shaky Republicans but that backfired bigly.
Never have Republicans been more united behind a president than right now.

The Master Plan was to dirty up the president for the election and parlay the situation down-ticket as voters climbed aboard.

REALITY CHECK: Trump's ace numbers-cruncher Brad Parscale announced a 20-30 point uptick for Donald in the latest numbers.
Republican fund-raising is going through the roof.

UPSHOT Some Democraps in swing districts are reading the want ads as we type.
Nanzi is sleeping with gavel under her pillow one last time.

24 posted on 01/26/2020 4:16:01 AM PST by Liz ( Our side has 8 trillion bullets; the other side doesn't know which bathroom to use.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child

As Philbin pointed out, a House committee has to first be authorized by a vote of the House, and this is important to prevent “runaway” committees.


25 posted on 01/26/2020 4:29:15 AM PST by Missouri gal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Missouri gal

When pelosi repeatedly stated that they, the house don’t need to vote, Mark Levin was all over this on his radio show. Seems that pelosi just “deemed” it so...again.


26 posted on 01/26/2020 4:51:13 AM PST by redshawk ( I want my red balloon. ( https://youtu.be/V12H2mteniE))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: bitt

bkmk


27 posted on 01/26/2020 5:20:10 AM PST by sauropod (If women are upset at TrumpÂ’s naughty words, who bought 80 million copies of 50 Shades of Grey?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bitt

Somebody needs to translate this argument into one-syllable words, because it’s apparently too complicated for Pierre Delecto to understand.


28 posted on 01/26/2020 5:37:11 AM PST by Stosh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bitt

The Trump Team have such an overwhelming sense of peace and calm. They were a joy to listen to after 24 hours of overwrought ranting by the Pelosi Possee


29 posted on 01/26/2020 6:41:56 AM PST by McGavin999 (Queen Fancy Nancy Of North Poopistan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bitt

Yep - also explains why they didn’t pursue legal recourse to force the handing over of documents and witnesses - they had no legal standing and they knew it.
Instead of getting shot down in the courts, they opted for the propaganda spree - which the defense had deep-sixed on them.


30 posted on 01/26/2020 6:43:00 AM PST by trebb (Don't howl about illegal leeches, or Trump in general, while not donating to FR - it's hypocritical.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child

Not in an impeachment where Executive Privilege is in question.


31 posted on 01/26/2020 6:48:07 AM PST by McGavin999 (Queen Fancy Nancy Of North Poopistan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: bitt

Advantage Trump for his defense only taking a couple of hours and letting them go.

And immediately Shif went out to the hall to do a 4 hour presser.


32 posted on 01/26/2020 7:16:33 AM PST by lurk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-32 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson