Posted on 01/08/2020 11:25:02 AM PST by Tolerance Sucks Rocks
A group of women whose lives were ruined after being coerced into participating in pornography has just gotten some small measure of vindication in a civil suit against the pornographers.
According to The Washington Post, a California judge has tentatively ordered a pornography company to pay $13 million to 22 young women after ruling that they were tricked and inappropriately pressured to make the videos which did not, as promised, stay offline.
The ruling, given last Thursday, was the latest development in the women’s years-long legal battle against the owners of GirlsDoPorn, a San Diego-based business that made millions producing the pornography it distributes through its subscription website and other porn websites. The Post also reports that the company is also in the middle of a separate criminal case in which its owners and employees face up to life in prison for federal sex-trafficking charges.
San Diego Superior Court Judge Kevin A. Enright noted in the civil case that what made GirlsDoPorn especially popular was that the women in the videos “are not professional porn stars but are amateur college-aged women filming pornography for the first and only time.”
The Post continues:
(Excerpt) Read more at activistmommy.com ...
These women were dumb as rocks.
Earth girls are easy.
“Cause I’m a Blonde”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S9Wi3A3skb0
Never cared for that movie.
These girls actually believed the promises? Don’t get me wrong. I hope the pornographers rot in jail. But, really. How idiotic can you be?
We still don’t know if they’re registered Democrats....
Seems that these guys clearly engaged in fraud.... but Life in Prison?
For crying out loud Angelo Mozilo committed fraud and stole hundreds of millions from folks, and didn’t even go to jail for it.
Believe me I am not defending these guys, but there is something seriously wrong with our criminal justice system.
“A group of women whose lives were ruined after being coerced into participating in pornography “
There is nothing in the public record which suggests they were coerced.
The claim makes the source suspect, at least.
It’s a fabricated accusation.
As are allusions to the producers facing life in prison. There is noting in the public record to indicate a crime was committed.
AT MOST they are guilty of verbally defrauding the participants by promising something not in the written contract.
And ALL of the participants were willing.
We still don’t know if they’re registered Democrats....
___________________________________________
They’ll **** for money. They must be Democrats.
Nope. No prior criminal court conviction on the defendants. Which is true about almost every civil suit with rare exceptions like the Covington boys.
Of course, what is described is fairly common in the pornography industry.
It’s a BS headline. According to the article, what really happened was they agreed to make specialty videos (for a single customer, usually) and that the films would stay offline; the pornographers immediately posted the vids online to Pornhub and their own site. Oops.
Here’s the quote: “Instead, GirlsDoPorn swiftly uploaded the videos to its website and Pornhub, one of the world’s leading adult-video sites, where they amassed millions of views. The women were doxed and harassed relentlessly, and the videos were sent to their parents, siblings, boyfriends, coaches and pastors. Enright found that, at best, the company knew the result was inevitable and profited from it; at worst, it actively participated in it by revealing names, identifying details and social media accounts as a means of attracting additional subscribers.”
There are almost certainly members of this forum who financially enabled these sex abusers (or at least ones like them). You can identify them by their obsessive compulsion to attack the women and excuse the pornographers.
I recently read an article that discussed how the most popular porn site on the Internet had a most-favorited video of a girl who actually turned out to be underage and was coerced into doing the porn (the “performance” was in reality a rape). She had been exploited as a runaway teen.
I suggest that men who use pornography are usually unaware that they are actually engaged in a sex act with another man. A woman is not just an object to be used for sexual pleasure. She is a human being with an infinite depth to be discovered through friendship and intimacy (and more than just the sexual kind). But porn is mostly directed by men by which the women are often merely puppets of these men. So, the persons that porn users are really committing sex acts with are mostly other men.
[[but there is something seriously wrong with our criminal justice system.]]
Man just got sentenced to 16 years for burning a gay flag- while muslims can chant death to America, death to Jews in our own country and noone cares apparently-
Yep- the justice system is run by liberals and is anything but just
You sound like an angry feminist who was a slut in her earlier years and regrets it now.
Go insult people on some other board.
The only thing to top this, would be to have the case heard by that (female!) judge who had a threesome in her chambers...
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/kentucky-judge-accused-courthouse-threesome-suspended-n1112296
Your post is unreadable.
Well stated.
Be low life tramp.
Do low life tramp things on camera for money.
Claim victim status because...well just because they did not treat your tramp self like a princess.
Profit.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.