Posted on 01/28/2019 4:42:33 AM PST by Travis McGee
During the attempted electronic lynching of the Covington Catholic high school boys on the steps of the Lincoln Memorial, the mask hiding the Lefts genocidal rage slipped and was momentarily visible. The reality of the confrontation was inverted 180 degrees by the duplicitous mainstream media so that a smiling white teenager was made to face the wrath of an Orwellian two-minute hate that stretched on for days, even after the factual record was corrected. Accelerated by social media, the virtual lynch mob called for, among other horrors, MAGA-hat-wearing teenage boys to be fed headfirst into wood chippers, or for them to be locked en-masse into their school and the school to be burned to the ground.
This hurricane of socially sanctioned racial fury did not arise spontaneously, but was the result of deliberate cultivation over the past few decades by the political Left, academia, the mainstream media, and the Hollywood entertainment elite. Entire books could be written laying out the many already familiar examples of the Left encouraging racial animosity against whites, but that is not my goal in writing this piece.
I am instead observing that before every notorious genocide, the same pattern of marginalizing and demonizing a designated scapegoat population has occurred. On the steps of the Lincoln Memorial, the national mainstream media signaled that it was now acceptable to vent seething racial hatred against white males, even teenage boys. This was further telegraphed when notable verified Twitter blue-check accounts were not suspended after doxing the boys and posting explicit calls for violence against them. (By way of contrast, I was permanently banned from Twitter for posting an anti-burka meme that did not even name a religion.)
The Covington confrontation points to an ironclad historical pattern. Every previous genocide in modern times was preceded by a similar pattern of public demonization of state-designated scapegoats. But is correlation causation? Does the American Left intend to eventually commit genocide against white heritage American males? In my opinion, yes. Scapegoating is part of a clear pattern of conduct seen during every socialist power grab from the French Revolution until now. In the case of German national socialists, European Jews were the scapegoats of the Nazis during their climb to power. In the case of international socialists, AKA Communists, class enemies were usually but not always the designated scapegoats. Examples of class enemies would include the Kulaks in the Soviet Union, landlords in China, and intellectuals in Cambodia. But in other cases ethnic groups were targeted as scapegoats by Communists, to include the Ukrainians, Crimeans, Latvians and others.
So, are todays Democrats already planning to load their white heritage American enemies into boxcars for trips to a new Gulag? Probably not many at this time, but Barack Obamas political mentor Bill Ayers certainly considered it. Ayers believed that so many Americans would bitterly resist Communism that 25 million would have to be eliminated.
Today in the United States, a possible future genocide remains far down the track and around the curve, well out of sight, and beyond the power of most Americans to even imagine. But the historical record is clear. Broad social approval of class- or racially-based scapegoating is a necessary precursor stage to eventual genocide, and a combination of both variants was clearly seen in the Covington case.
Will planned genocide ever be the overtly stated policy of the socialist-leaning Democrat (DemSoc) party? Probably not. Even Adolf Hitler never put The Final Solution to the Jewish Question into a formal written order, but the Holocaust happened nonetheless. Vladimir Lenin was less cautious, recording his orders for state terror and mass murder in his own handwriting.
But todays American Democrats are still far from that final stage of dealing with their enemies. For now, the demonization of their future scapegoats is only one indicator of the current phase of the Gramscian long march through the institutions stealth communization process that is now underway.
So what is the overall process currently in play, and where are we on the timeline? I am going to assume that readers of this essay are already familiar with the Dunning-Kruger Effect and the Cloward-Piven Strategy. Summarized, the current Democrat strategy for political victory is to maximize the number of government-dependent morons, in order to overwhelm our national ability to pay for all of the governments mandated social programs, to thereby collapse the system and bring about a revolutionary political climate. This is taken straight out of the Bolshevik and Alinsky handbooks. Vladimir Lenin supposedly put it this way: The worse, the better.
As the government fails to keep up with its social welfare promises, the Democrats will blame their pre-designated scapegoats for every one of their own failures. In the United States, Public Enemy Number One will be older white Christian conservative heterosexual men who will be called obstructionists and saboteurs. Being morons, the Dunning-Kruger Democrats will fall for the party line, and also blame white heritage American scapegoats for the failure of their own partys utopian promises.
Why will the Democrats push for social welfare programs that are impossible to achieve, that in fact have failed in every other case ever attempted? Because they only care about attaining permanent power for themselves, and this process is a proven method for reaching that goal. The Democrat elites are content to rule the ruins of a failed nation, in perpetuity. And to do so, they will need a convenient scapegoat population to blame for their own failed policies, and that is why they are encouraging identity (racial) politics, as starkly seen in the Covington confrontation. They are preparing their time-tested psychological weapons of mass destruction for the next phases in the ongoing stealth communization process. You may observe the history of Venezuela over the past twenty years to see the entire process carried out from start to finish.
The unexpected election of President Donald Trump indicated to Democrat party leaders that there were still too many white heritage Americans as a percentage of the electorate for them to cement their identity-politics socialist triumph in perpetuity. There are not yet enough moronic Dunning-Kruger Democrats to push the DemSocs over the top in national elections forever.
THE CALIZUELA MODEL
Despite Trumps 2016 victory, a glowing example of the solution to their national electoral shortfall is clearly visible to Democrat leaders. In my lifetime California was the wealthiest and most successful state in the union. It produced Republican governors and even sent Ronald Reagan to the White House. But due to open borders and unchecked immigration, California is halfway to becoming Venezuela, or as I shall term it, Calizuela. The former Golden State has gone from national leader to national embarrassment, with squalid tent cities for its burgeoning homeless population, complete with needle- and feces-strewn sidewalks.
Amazingly, this observable failure is counted as a great political victory by the Democrat party. Calizuela is proof that flooding a state with government-dependent foreign idiots and rewarding them with drivers licenses and voter cards can turn a formerly conservative Republican state into a one-party Democrat stronghold in a single generation. The proven Calizuela formula is blazingly clear to the Democrat Party bosses in the other 49 states: import as many poor and illiterate foreign immigrants as possible, because over 80 percent of them will sooner or later become reliable Democrat voters. (And this is the reason that Nancy Pelosi and the Democrats refuse to pay more than one dollar for an actual, physical border wall or barrier.)
(Read the rest at the American Partisan link here.)
-—excellent article—
Let us consider the final frontier of biology: DNA. What research is being currently conducted that only the smallest fragments leak out to knowledgeable people? What kind of black ops programs in the US, China and Russia are analyzing and considering a multitude of different applications? So, here's what's coming down the pike:
The first applications of genetic research and applied gene therapies will be to target cancers and other pressing medical needs to combat diseases. The second phase will be cosmetics in nature - new hair for balding men, eliminate grey for all 9 (or is it 10 now, so hard to keep up) genders, fresh, pliable skin, etc.
The 3rd stage begin to transform all societies when skin, hair & eye color can be changed, when texture & length can be selected, etc. Which standards of beauty will be demanded, which race(s) will be demanded? Ultimately, it's the 4th wave that is the real game changer: when IQ can be improved and at least brought to a base level for all peoples. What happens to a political party that panders to those cognitively unable to provide for themselves?
FR loves to be a real doom & gloom place. Consider the proglibs as similar to the imperial Japan. Lot's of initial, tactical victories, but never seeing the strategic component driven by technological advances. Emotional progs aren't capable of STEM, so they need their daily dose of drama. But the real (scientific) changes happen over decades that completely alter the playing field.
I can easily imagine a future rat president ordering exactly that.
Bookmark
The Lefts ultimate plan isnt white genocide, specificall, but is more directed at fomenting general mayhem leading to societal collapse in general. The use of racial divisions is just too easy to ignore.
The article clearly proves the democrats are in rebellion and clearly intend to destroy the Republic. Why are they not being treated accordingly ?
Great article, Matt. Liked the linked articles too.
Self-defense wise conservatives will resist if they are physically threatened. As you say though unless them or their families are in harms way most will continue to get up and go to work and obey the law, go along get along.
However, the left may not allow this at some point and cells will spring up taking the fight to the government and the left which would run the government more than likely in some form. As to whether it breaks down along urban vs. rural or white vs. black or black vs. Hispanic, who knows. These cells will have to make these attacks hurt their enemies and not most of their neighbors and in the process make the government and the lefts heavy handed response hurt not just the targeted white conservatives for genocide but the rest of society to gain sympathy and support from the locals.
It would be as you say, small for the most part but there would be big events through the process and depending on the US military’s response, short or a lengthy in duration and above all a nasty affair. There would be huge sections of the country the left/government just could not physically control, there are not enough troops or law enforcement to be every place all the time.
They could move in and control an area sure, as long as they leave a substantial force in place, but as soon as they move that force to control another area, they lose control of where they just left. But the conservatives may have no choice as the left seems hellbent to force their crazed ways on the people.
trl
“These vultures dont give a damn about the country, just what it takes to enrich themselves. They sell their souls to the very socialists who will end up lining them up along the execution ditch.”
“The capitalists will sell us the rope with which we will hang them.” V. I. Lenin
Thanks for posting it.
‘Pod
I am quite sure that something similar was said at the very early stages of the Russian Revolution, when all of Russia was utterly exhausted from the massive casualties of WW1 and the resultant famines. Yet, massive armies all over Russia ended up fighting in their Civil War.
As I say to everyone that I know, I don’t have a working crystal ball, nor have I ever heard of anyone who does. You may be right, and you may be wrong...but Mr. Bracken has a pretty good handle on how the Left thinks and acts, and certain acts create other natural reactions.
I agree that the canary in this particular coal mine is the disarmament of the general public, an act that must precede the others lest they fail in the face of armed resistance. The increasing Democrat passion for this has paralleled that party's lurch to the left and it's no accident. Not all of them have the goal of genocide but all of them do have the goal of power, and if it takes genocide to attain or maintain that, then fine, by any means necessary. The media can always call it something else and keep it out of sight. After all, most Germans who weren't Nazis put up with the camps because they didn't have to look at them, didn't want to think about them, and at last because they didn't want to end up in them.
I think, though, that the targeted minority in this case remains too large and too heavily armed for anything of the sort to happen anytime soon. A generation from now, who knows? Two generations? Sometimes it takes the loss of freedom to rediscover that it's worth fighting for. And buried ammunition lasts a long time.
At least a lot of us have had the sense to move away from the blue hives in time. When they go up in flames, it won’t matter who you are. Just understanding the issues presented in these posts puts us miles ahead of the herd of NPC drones.
Bump for a great essay.
Yup.
Pretty soon the time for pretty words will be over.
I check the zero on my rifles pretty often.
Bttt.
5.56mm
Absolutely. During a period of anarchy and civil war in the USA, our foreign enemies will be happy to help themselves to some choice cuts. They will be invited in as "peacekeepers," but they won't leave.
This is the subject of my 3rd novel, Foreign Enemies and Traitors.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.