Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Amendment 6 - "...the right to be confronted with the witnesses against him..."
The US Constitution ^ | 17 Sep 1787 | Constitutional Convention

Posted on 09/21/2018 7:16:21 AM PDT by xzins

Amendment 6 - Rights of Accused in Criminal Prosecutions

In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence.

(Excerpt) Read more at constitutionus.com ...


TOPICS: Conspiracy; Government; Miscellaneous; Politics
KEYWORDS: constitution; kavenaugh; scotus; smear
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

1 posted on 09/21/2018 7:16:21 AM PDT by xzins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: All

The democrats are all accusing Kavenaugh of rape or attempted rape a criminal offense.

He is before the government under oath in this Senate hearing.

He has the right to be confronted by his accusers.

The Senate is bargaining away this man’s right to face his accusers.


2 posted on 09/21/2018 7:18:03 AM PDT by xzins (Retired US Army chaplain. Support our troops by praying for their victory.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xzins
In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right...

But what does the Constitution say about rights in political proceedings like this?

3 posted on 09/21/2018 7:21:01 AM PDT by semimojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xzins

I thought it was illegal to lie to the FBI.

How come Ford wasn’t prosecuted when they determined her story to be not credible?


4 posted on 09/21/2018 7:23:59 AM PDT by Safrguns
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xzins

Sorry, the 6th only applies to criminal proceedings.


5 posted on 09/21/2018 7:34:50 AM PDT by taxcontrol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: xzins

It’s not a criminal proceeding. It involves alleged criminal ACTS, but the matter is not being heard in a criminal PROCEEDING. Thus, the 6th is not directly on point.


6 posted on 09/21/2018 7:41:54 AM PDT by ought-six (Multiculturalism is national suicide, and political correctness is the cyanide capsule.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: taxcontrol
Sorry, the 6th only applies to criminal proceedings.

The left is talking about FBI investigations, felony rape and assault charges, and the like. The 6th Amendment applies.

7 posted on 09/21/2018 7:45:35 AM PDT by frogjerk (We are conservatives. Not libertarians, not "fiscal conservatives", not moderates)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: frogjerk; taxcontrol

> The 6th Amendment applies. <

I believe taxcontrol is correct. The 6th Amendment does not apply. True, crimes are being discussed here. But this is not a criminal trial. Kavenaugh is not under threat of fine or imprisonment.


8 posted on 09/21/2018 7:53:42 AM PDT by Leaning Right (I have already previewed or do not wish to preview this composition.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: xzins

Can someone explain how the FBI has any authority in this matter even if they were to determine that her claim was credible? If what she claims is true, it would be a state crime and should be investigated by the Maryland State Police or the Bethesda(?) Police Department. There is no alleged federal crime here.

All of these know-nothings on TV fail to acknowledge that Clarence Thomas was alleged to commit a federal crime in a federal building, which is entirely within the responsibility and jurisdiction of the FBI. Big difference from this professor alleging a state crime, where the statute of limitations has long passed.


9 posted on 09/21/2018 7:56:42 AM PDT by mjustice (Apparently common sense isn't so common.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Leaning Right

Criminal trial, only.

Personally, I think anybody can accuse anyone of anything; *ONLY* what is returned in a court of law should matter.

I’m willing to give even the slimiest Democrat this same benefit of the doubt- *ANY* accusation should be proved or the accuser humiliated, left or right, a person I like or a person I loath.

Everything is always knowable (at least anything worth making a decision on), that which can’t be measured doesn’t matter as far as I am concerned.

Date, time, place, first hand witnesses/photographic proof or STFU -be they Dem or Republican.

Cranky .02


10 posted on 09/21/2018 8:20:55 AM PDT by RedStateRocker (Nuke Mecca. Deport all illegals. Abolish the DEA, IRS and ATF,.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: xzins

This isn’t taking place in a court, so it doesn’t really apply. This is taking place at a confirmation hearing in the Senate.


11 posted on 09/21/2018 8:49:19 AM PDT by SirFishalot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: semimojo

Because this is under oath, and the accusation are criminal, Judge Kavenaugh is arguably under legal jeopardy for criminal charges.


12 posted on 09/21/2018 8:59:48 AM PDT by xzins (Retired US Army chaplain. Support our troops by praying for their victory.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Safrguns

I haven’t heard that the FBI made an official statement like that


13 posted on 09/21/2018 9:00:33 AM PDT by xzins (Retired US Army chaplain. Support our troops by praying for their victory.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: taxcontrol

Again, since Kavenaugh is under oath, there is legal jeopardy.


14 posted on 09/21/2018 9:01:16 AM PDT by xzins (Retired US Army chaplain. Support our troops by praying for their victory.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ought-six

Correct. It is not directly a criminal proceeding, but it is under oath before a legal body that can pursue as it determines.

So, Kavenaugh is under legal jeopardy.


15 posted on 09/21/2018 9:02:44 AM PDT by xzins (Retired US Army chaplain. Support our troops by praying for their victory.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: frogjerk

I agree with you.

Anyone who thinks that Kavenaugh isn’t under oath and therefore in legal jeopardy isn’t thinking clearly


16 posted on 09/21/2018 9:03:41 AM PDT by xzins (Retired US Army chaplain. Support our troops by praying for their victory.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: mjustice

Do you trust FBI Director Wray and his stable of democrat stooges?


17 posted on 09/21/2018 9:04:24 AM PDT by xzins (Retired US Army chaplain. Support our troops by praying for their victory.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: xzins

But this is not a prosecution, it is an accusation.


18 posted on 09/21/2018 9:07:05 AM PDT by JimRed ( TERM LIMITS, NOW! Build the Wall Faster! TRUTH is the new HATE SPEECH.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JimRed

It’s under oath. There is legal jeopardy.


19 posted on 09/21/2018 9:09:04 AM PDT by xzins (Retired US Army chaplain. Support our troops by praying for their victory.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: xzins
Because this is under oath, and the accusation are criminal, Judge Kavenaugh is arguably under legal jeopardy for criminal charges.

Maybe when there are criminal charges the 6th Amendment will be relevant.

As for now, I’m pretty sure Grassley wants nothing to do with treating this like a trial with all of it’s procedural constraints.

20 posted on 09/21/2018 9:10:15 AM PDT by semimojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson