Ohio Democrat Mayor Pleads Guilty To Raping 4 Year Old & Gets Life With Chance At Parole

Christian's Worldview ^ | 3/27/17 | Chuck Ness

[OneVike]

Former Democrat Mayor of Hubbard Ohio, 66 yr old  Richard Keenan

Why is the media not reporting this news? Not one MSM television news source has reported it, not even FOX news. Nor will you find it reported in any major newspaper in the  country. I only found it because I stumbled on it looking for something else. 

You know for a fact, that if this guy was a Republican, it would be the lead story of every news show and the headline story of the NY Times.

Back in September 2016, the former Democrat Mayor of Hubbard Ohio, 65 year old Richard Keenan, was arrested for raping and molesting a child for 3 years. This abuse began when the girl was 4. It's very difficult for me to wrap my brain around this. Looks like the girl was 7 when she finally told the pervert's wife about the abuse. When she confronted her husband he admitted that he had been raping and molesting her since she was 4. 

FOUR YEARS OLD?  Dear Lord, I pray that this child can overcome this evil in her life.

She was nothing more than a toddler, and he decided to destroy her life. Get this, the pervert originally told the police that it was the toddler who initiated the acts. He actually used the words, “a willing participant“, when he describing what happened. Seriously? The toddler initiated the sex? Wow.

Court documents obtained by the Youngstown Vindicator reveal that he told police;

"The toddler walked in on him in the bathroom and asked him if she could touch his pee-pee. He than told them that he proceeded to kiss, fondle, and perform oral sex on the little girl. After which he had her give him oral sex."

This sick pervert had been the Mayor of Hubbard Ohio in 2010 and 2011. He eventually changed his story and plead to guilty to 8 counts of rape and 12 counts of attempted rape and gross sexual imposition. A rape conviction in the state of Ohio carries a sentence of life in prison,with the possibility for parole. They should given him death by putting him in regular population.

Mind you. At his age, if he is molesting littler toddlers, he has done it before. No one wakes up at 65 and decides to molest 4 year old girls unless they have done this before. They should be investigating to see who else he molested. Especially since he has the chance at parole after 10 years. So if he gets parole he will do it again. He should never ever see the light of freedom on this planet, ever again.

One more thing. The guy claims to be a Christian. Well this is not what Christians do. In fact, Jesus gives us a warning for what is best for those who harm children. He tells us in Matthew 18:6;

 “But whoever causes one of these little ones who believe in Me to sin, it would be better for him if a millstone were hung around his neck, and he were drowned in the depth of the sea."

I cannot attest to the guys heart, only God can. However, he was not the one to come forward, it was the little girl. Who, after 3 years of being raped, came forward and told the old pervert's wife what he had been doing to her. His actions tells us where his heart was, and it wasn't on Christ. You will know them by their fruits. (Matt 7:16) He felt guilty because he got caught, that's when he went and talked to his pastor and others. However, had the girl not said anything, he would still be using her for his pleasure. For some people, Christianity is just a cover for their perverse desires.

Click image below to see video report

[Just mythoughts]

God said back when He handed down His law to send these freaks back to Him. Course modern man has decided they know better than the Creator, and turn over to the shrink community to explain the depraved minds of evil souls..

[xrmusn]

haul him out to the brick wall shoot him and send the bill for the spent bullet to his parents or wife.
= = = = = =

Far to humanitarian.

Needs to be taken to the wall, strung up and let the citizenry use his as a pinata.

When he gets hungry, start feeding him his tallywacker, slicing it off a nibble at a time with a dullish blade.

[Trillian]

Typical of these evil, sick @%$#s to blame the victim for what they did. May he burn in hell.

[.45 Long Colt]

Get out of here with the pizza stuff. My quibble is with his handling of Scripture, not his point.

The verse is not universal, it’s clearly about children in Christ (elect children). Of course his point is valid and correct, but that particular verse isn’t about all children, it’s about believing children (”little ones who believe in me”). It’s not about Muslim children or Sikh children or Mormon children, it’s about children in Christ. Of course the Lord would condemn abuse of those children, too, but that’s not what that verse is about. There are plenty of other passages that would properly support the point without the use of eisegesis.

[.45 Long Colt]

That’s textbook eisegesis. That’s my only argument.

I wholeheartedly support your conclusion. I was the attorney for a child abuse victim in a particularly aggregious case back in the 90’s. I loathe molesters and believe the death penalty should be in play in certain instances because what was done to my client was unspeakable. That case led to a few more. I later did some work with SNAP to expose molesting clergy.

[.45 Long Colt]

And?

I’ll repeat what I said above. “My quibble is with his handling of Scripture, not his point. The verse is not universal, it’s clearly about children in Christ (elect children). Of course his point is valid and correct, but that particular verse isn’t about all children, it’s about believing children (”little ones who believe in me”). There are plenty of other passages that would properly support the point without the use of eisegesis.”

[Reddy]

It could have happened. When we were training to be foster parents, one discussion was about being careful around children who were sexually abused because they would initiate inappropriate actions. It sounds like the little girl had either been groomed or previously abused. (If the rapist was telling the truth about the initial encounter.)

[Reddy]

And depending on the appearance of the woman, declaring her “not guilty”.

[OneVike]

We’re cool. I Understood your beef, and I agree.

As I said, I used only half the verse to get my point across. Not to make a theological point.

I used the ignorance of many over the Scriptures to drive my point home to them. It worked.

Maybe I’ll write a theological article stating your point as to whom this and the ones before and after it were directed at.

[.45 Long Colt]

I’m sorry. I was too critical.

[Rappini]

I can agree to that.